| Literature DB >> 27272680 |
Linlin Cui1,2,3,4, Yan Sheng1,2,3,4, Mei Sun1,2,3,4, Jingmei Hu1,2,3,4, Yingying Qin1,2,3,4, Zi-Jiang Chen1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the potential damaging effect of chronic pelvic inflammation on ovarian reserve.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27272680 PMCID: PMC4894572 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical characteristics.
| Bilateral tube occlusion (n = 122) | Normal fallopian tube (n = 217) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs) | 31.43±4.94 | 30.85±5.11 | 0.31 |
| Childbearing [%(N)] | 51.60 (63) | 45.60 (99) | 0.29 |
Data were presented as mean± standard deviation for age, median (interquartile range) for BMI, and incidence (positive numbers) for categorical variable.
BMI: body mass index.
a: Statistical significance was found between cases and control subjects(P<0.05).
Comparison of parameters indicating ovarian reserve between cases and controls.
| Bilateral tube occlusion (n = 122) | Normal fallopian tube (n = 217) | P | Padjust | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFC | 6 (4) | 7 (4) | 0.23 | 0.18 |
| FSH(IU/L) | 7.00 (2.16) | 6.74 (2.30) | 0.77 | 0.99 |
| LH (IU/L) | 4.18 (1.52) | 4.63 (2.52) | 0.30 | 0.58 |
| E2(pg/ml) | 35.95 (20.40) | 34.90 (17.85) | 0.42 | 0.20 |
| T(ng/dL) | 25.07±11.46 | 24.84±12.75 | 0.87 | 0.99 |
Data were presented as mean± standard deviation for normality distribution variables and median(quartile interval) for non-normality distribution variables.
Difference of the means between two groups was determined after lg-transformation using Students’ T test. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for adjustment of the covariance.
FSH: follicle stimulating hormone; LH: luteinizing hormone; E2: estradiol; T: testosterone; AMH: anti-müllerian hormone
Padjust: adjustment for BMI
a: Statistical significance was found between cases and control subjects(P<0.05).