Literature DB >> 27272510

Parallel linear dynamic models can mimic the McGurk effect in clinical populations.

Nicholas Altieri1, Cheng-Ta Yang2.   

Abstract

One of the most common examples of audiovisual speech integration is the McGurk effect. As an example, an auditory syllable /ba/ recorded over incongruent lip movements that produce "ga" typically causes listeners to hear "da". This report hypothesizes reasons why certain clinical and listeners who are hard of hearing might be more susceptible to visual influence. Conversely, we also examine why other listeners appear less susceptible to the McGurk effect (i.e., they report hearing just the auditory stimulus without being influenced by the visual). Such explanations are accompanied by a mechanistic explanation of integration phenomena including visual inhibition of auditory information, or slower rate of accumulation of inputs. First, simulations of a linear dynamic parallel interactive model were instantiated using inhibition and facilitation to examine potential mechanisms underlying integration. In a second set of simulations, we systematically manipulated the inhibition parameter values to model data obtained from listeners with autism spectrum disorder. In summary, we argue that cross-modal inhibition parameter values explain individual variability in McGurk perceptibility. Nonetheless, different mechanisms should continue to be explored in an effort to better understand current data patterns in the audiovisual integration literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audiovisual integration; McGurk effect; Parallel interactive linear dynamic model

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27272510     DOI: 10.1007/s10827-016-0610-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  28 in total

1.  Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove; Ken W Grant; David Poeppel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Auditory-visual speech perception and aging.

Authors:  Kathleen M Cienkowski; Arlene Earley Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Individual differences in the multisensory temporal binding window predict susceptibility to audiovisual illusions.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Raquel K Zemtsov; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Auditory-visual speech integration by adults with and without language-learning disabilities.

Authors:  Linda W Norrix; Elena Plante; Rebecca Vance
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Perception of the auditory-visual illusion in speech perception by children with phonological disorders.

Authors:  Barbara Dodd; Beth McIntosh; Dogu Erdener; Denis Burnham
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.346

7.  The noisy encoding of disparity model of the McGurk effect.

Authors:  John F Magnotti; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

8.  Multisensory and sensorimotor interactions in speech perception.

Authors:  Kaisa Tiippana; Riikka Möttönen; Jean-Luc Schwartz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-20

9.  Susceptibility to a multisensory speech illusion in older persons is driven by perceptual processes.

Authors:  Annalisa Setti; Kate E Burke; Roseanne Kenny; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-03

10.  Eluding the illusion? Schizophrenia, dopamine and the McGurk effect.

Authors:  Thomas P White; Rebekah L Wigton; Dan W Joyce; Tracy Bobin; Christian Ferragamo; Nisha Wasim; Stephen Lisk; Sukhwinder S Shergill
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  A new measure of group decision-making efficiency.

Authors:  Cheng-Ju Hsieh; Mario Fifić; Cheng-Ta Yang
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-09-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.