Literature DB >> 27272269

Should Gastric Decompression be a Routine Procedure in Patients Who Undergo Pylorus-Preserving Pancreatoduodenectomy?

Joon Seong Park1, Jae Young Kim2, Jae Keun Kim2, Dong Sup Yoon2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nasogastric tube placement after abdominal surgery has been a standard procedure for many decades. In pancreatoduodenectomy, delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is still a leading postoperative complication, often resulting in patient anxiety or depression and prolonged hospital stays. Such complications have led many surgeons to prefer postoperative nasogastric decompression because of the greater risk of DGE. Therefore, the goal of this study was to evaluate the DGE and perioperative outcomes after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) with or without routine gastrostomy.
METHODS: From May 2009 to December 2014, 228 patients underwent PPPD at the Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University. The first cohort of 116 patients underwent surgery before June 2012 and uniformly underwent gastric decompression as a part of postoperative management. The second cohort of 112 patients underwent operation after July 2012, and gastric decompression was selectively used to facilitate exposure during operation and was removed in the operating room at the end of surgery. We evaluated DGE incidence, time to dietary tolerance, length of hospital stay, and postoperative gastric tube reinsertion rates.
RESULTS: Gastric re-decompression was necessary in 38 patients (16.7 %), and there was a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.006). Eleven (9.8 %) patients in the no-tube gastrostomy group required nasogastric tube reinsertion, and 27 (23.3 %) in the routine gastrostomy group required that the gastrostomy tube be re-drainage. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency or severity of complications such as delayed gastric emptying or pancreatic leakage.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that routine postoperative gastric decompression can be safely avoided in patients who undergo PPPD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27272269     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3604-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  21 in total

1.  Routine nasogastric decompression is unnecessary after pancreatic resections.

Authors:  Christina L Roland; John C Mansour; Roderich E Schwarz
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-03

2.  Role of the duodenum in the control of canine gastrointestinal motility.

Authors:  M Tanaka; M G Sarr
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Prospective randomized comparison between pylorus-preserving and standard pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  P W Lin; Y J Lin
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Gastric dysrhythmias following pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Possible mechanism for early delayed gastric emptying.

Authors:  M P Hocking; W D Harrison; C A Sninsky
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Systematic review of prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal operations.

Authors:  R Nelson; B Tse; S Edwards
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Enteral nutrition prolongs delayed gastric emptying in patients after Whipple resection.

Authors:  M E Martignoni; H Friess; F Sell; L Ricken; S Shrikhande; C Kulli; M W Büchler
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Pyloric and gastric preserving pancreatic resection. Experience with 87 patients.

Authors:  J W Braasch; D J Deziel; R L Rossi; E Watkins; P F Winter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Nasogastric drainage may be unnecessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparison of routine vs selective decompression.

Authors:  John W Kunstman; Nicholas D Klemen; Annabelle L Fonseca; Deborah L Araya; Ronald R Salem
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 9.  Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  R Nelson; S Edwards; B Tse
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

10.  Pylorus-preserving Whipple resection for pancreatic cancer. Is it any better?

Authors:  A G Patel; M T Toyama; A M Kusske; P Alexander; S W Ashley; H A Reber
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-08
View more
  5 in total

1.  Should Gastric Decompression Be a Routine Procedure in Patients Who Undergo Pylorus-Preserving Pancreatoduodenectomy?: Reply.

Authors:  Joon Seong Park; Jae Young Kim; Jae Keun Kim; Dong Sup Yoon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Who Does Benefit from Nasogastric Decompression? Patient or Surgeon.

Authors:  Mesut Tez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Nasogastric Tube on Demand is Rarely Necessary After Pancreatoduodenectomy Within an Enhanced Recovery Pathway.

Authors:  D Kleive; Mushegh A Sahakyan; K J Labori; K Lassen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Impact of routine nasogastric decompression versus no nasogastric decompression after pancreaticoduodenectomy on perioperative outcomes: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Khaled Ammar; Chris Varghese; Thejasvin K; Viswakumar Prabakaran; Stuart Robinson; Samir Pathak; Bobby V M Dasari; Sanjay Pandanaboyana
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-11-09

5.  Efficacy of gastric decompression after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jia Gao; Xinchun Liu; Haoran Wang; Rongchao Ying
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.067

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.