Literature DB >> 27271973

Combining lymphovascular invasion with reactive stromal grade predicts prostate cancer mortality.

Thorstein Saeter1,2, Ljiljana Vlatkovic3, Gudmund Waaler2, Einar Servoll2, Jahn M Nesland1,3, Karol Axcrona4, Ulrika Axcrona3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that lymphovascular invasion (LVI) has a weak and variable effect on prognosis. It is uncertain whether LVI, determined by diagnostic prostate biopsy, predicts prostate cancer death. Data from experimental studies have indicated that carcinoma-associated fibroblasts in the reactive stroma could promote LVI and progression to metastasis. Thus, combining LVI with reactive stromal grade may identify prostate cancer patients at high risk of an unfavorable outcome. The purpose of the present study was to examine if LVI, determined by diagnostic biopsy, alone and in combination with reactive stromal grade could predict prostate cancer death.
METHODS: This population-based study included 283 patients with prostate cancer diagnosed by needle biopsy in Aust-Agder County (Norway) from 1991 to 1999. Clinical data were obtained by medical charts review. Two uropathologists evaluated LVI and reactive stromal grade. The endpoint was prostate cancer death.
RESULTS: Patients with LVI had marginally higher risk of prostate cancer death compared to patients without LVI (hazard ratio: 1.8, P-value = 0.04). LVI had a stronger effect on prostate cancer death risk when a high reactive stromal grade was present (hazard ratio: 16.0, P-value <0.001). Therefore, patients with concomitant LVI and high reactive stromal grade were at particularly high risk for prostate cancer death.
CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating LVI together with reactive stromal grade on diagnostic biopsies could be used to identify patients at high risk of death from prostate cancer. Prostate 76:1088-1094, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lymphovascular invasion; prognosis; prostate cancer; reactive stroma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27271973     DOI: 10.1002/pros.23192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  4 in total

Review 1.  Interaction of prostate carcinoma-associated fibroblasts with human epithelial cell lines in vivo.

Authors:  Takeshi Sasaki; Omar E Franco; Simon W Hayward
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.880

2.  The significance of micro-lymphatic invasion and pathological Gleason score in prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Takeshi Hashimoto; Jun Nakashima; Rie Inoue; Osamu Komori; Yuri Yamaguchi; Takeshi Kashima; Naoya Satake; Yoshihiro Nakagami; Kazunori Namiki; Toshitaka Nagao; Yoshio Ohno
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Target prostate biopsies: How best to report in synoptic format?

Authors:  Michelle R Downes; John R Srigley; Andrew Loblaw; Nathan Perlis; Sangeet Ghai; Theodorus van der Kwast
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Focal p53 protein expression and lymphovascular invasion in primary prostate tumors predict metastatic progression.

Authors:  William Gesztes; Cara Schafer; Denise Young; Jesse Fox; Jiji Jiang; Yongmei Chen; Huai-Ching Kuo; Kuwong B Mwamukonda; Albert Dobi; Allen P Burke; Judd W Moul; David G McLeod; Inger L Rosner; Gyorgy Petrovics; Shyh-Han Tan; Jennifer Cullen; Shiv Srivastava; Isabell A Sesterhenn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.