Literature DB >> 27271839

The Prevalence of Tuberous/Constricted Breast Deformity in Population and in Breast Augmentation and Reduction Mammaplasty Patients.

Marco Klinger1, Fabio Caviggioli2, Silvia Giannasi3, Valeria Bandi3, Barbara Banzatti3, Alessandra Veronesi3, Federico Barbera3, Luca Maione3, Barbara Catania3, Valeriano Vinci3, Andrea Lisa3, Guido Cornegliani2, Micol Giaccone3, Mattia Siliprandi3, Francesco Klinger2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The exact prevalence of tuberous breast deformity (TBD) has not been properly investigated and still remains undetermined. We report our data about TBD prevalence with the aim of demonstrating its high prevalence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on preoperative photographs of 1600 Caucasian female patients admitted to our department from January 2009 to July 2014 for augmentation or reduction mammaplasty and other breast clinical conditions. The main features of TBD included a contracted skin envelope, a reduction in breast parenchyma of the lower medial and lateral quadrants, a constricted breast base, abnormal elevation of the inframammary fold, herniation of the breast into the areola with a constricted breast base, and nipple areola complex herniation with a normal breast base. Patients were classified into three groups: breast augmentation group (AUG group), breast reduction group (RED group), and general population group (POP group).
RESULTS: Four hundred patients were analyzed for each group (AUG and RED group); 194 patients (48.5 %) and 189 cases (47.3 %), respectively, demonstrated at least one tuberous breast deformity; in 800 patients of the POP group, we found 221 patients (27.6 %) with at least one tuberous breast deformity.
CONCLUSIONS: Retrospective analysis reveals a high prevalence of TBD in the general population and in particular in women seeking breast augmentation or breast reduction (about 50 %). TBD is characterized by a wide range of clinical features with a spectrum of degrees. Preoperative evaluation is crucial to achieve an optimum outcome and patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmentation mammaplasty; Constricted breast; Prevalence; Reduction mammaplasty; Stenotic breast; Tuberous breast deformity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27271839     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-016-0650-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  4 in total

1.  The Underappreciated Saline Breast Implant.

Authors:  Ted Eisenberg
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  The Periareolar Approach: All Seasons Technique for Multiple Breast Conditions.

Authors:  Marco Klinger; Valeriano Vinci; Silvia Giannasi; Valeria Bandi; Alessandra Veronesi; Luca Maione; Barbara Catania; Andrea Lisa; Guido Cornegliani; Micol Giaccone; Mattia Siliprandi; Andrea Battistini; Federico Barbera; Corrado Tinterri; Alberto Testori; Fabio Caviggioli; Francesco Klinger
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-20

3.  Review of Tuberous Breast Deformity: Developments over the Last 20 Years.

Authors:  Alessia Lozito; Valeriano Vinci; Eleonora Talerico; Rosanna Asselta; Luca Di Tommaso; Benedetta Agnelli; Marco Klinger; Francesco Klinger
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Reply to "The Limitations of Periareolar Mammaplasty".

Authors:  Marco Klinger; Valeriano Vinci; Andrea Battistini; Francesco Klinger
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-01-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.