Literature DB >> 27271819

Pencil it in: pencil drawn electrochemical sensing platforms.

Christopher W Foster1, Dale A C Brownson1, Ana P Ruas de Souza2, Elena Bernalte3, Jesus Iniesta4, Mauro Bertotti2, Craig E Banks1.   

Abstract

Inspired by recent reports concerning the utilisation of hand drawn pencil macroelectrodes (PDEs), we report the fabrication, characterisation (physicochemical and electrochemical) and implementation (electrochemical sensing) of various PDEs drawn upon a flexible polyester substrate. Electrochemical characterisation reveals that there are no quantifiable electrochemical responses upon utilising these PDEs with an electroactive analyte that requires an electrochemical oxidation step first, therefore the PDEs have been examined towards the electroactive redox probes hexaammineruthenium(iii) chloride, potassium ferricyanide and ammonium iron(ii) sulfate. For the first time, characterisation of the number of drawn pencil layers and the grade of pencil are examined; these parameters are commonly overlooked when utilising PDEs. It is demonstrated that a PDE drawn ten times with a 6B pencil presented the most advantageous electrochemical platform, in terms of electrochemical reversibility and peak height/analytical signal. In consideration of the aforementioned limitation, analytes requiring an electrochemical reduction as the first process were solely analysed. We demonstrate the beneficial electroanalytical capabilities of these PDEs towards p-benzoquinone and the simultaneous detection of heavy metals, namely lead(ii) and cadmium(ii), all of which are explored for the first time utilising PDEs. Initially, the detection limits of this system were higher than desired for electroanalytical platforms, however upon implementation of the PDEs in a back-to-back configuration (in which two PDEs are placed back-to-back sharing a single connection to the potentiostat), the detection limits for lead(ii) and cadmium(ii) correspond to 10 μg L(-1) and 98 μg L(-1) respectively within model aqueous (0.1 M HCl) solutions.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27271819     DOI: 10.1039/c6an00402d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Analyst        ISSN: 0003-2654            Impact factor:   4.616


  4 in total

1.  Pencil It in: Exploring the Feasibility of Hand-Drawn Pencil Electrochemical Sensors and Their Direct Comparison to Screen-Printed Electrodes.

Authors:  Elena Bernalte; Christopher W Foster; Dale A C Brownson; Morgane Mosna; Graham C Smith; Craig E Banks
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-29

Review 2.  Pencil Graphite Electrodes: A Versatile Tool in Electroanalysis.

Authors:  Iulia Gabriela David; Dana-Elena Popa; Mihaela Buleandra
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.193

3.  Enhanced performance of pencil-drawn paper-based electrodes by laser-scribing treatment.

Authors:  Vanessa N Ataide; Wilson A Ameku; Raphael P Bacil; Lúcio Angnes; William R de Araujo; Thiago R L C Paixão
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.361

Review 4.  Electrochemiluminescence Biosensors Using Screen-Printed Electrodes.

Authors:  Emiliano Martínez-Periñán; Cristina Gutiérrez-Sánchez; Tania García-Mendiola; Encarnación Lorenzo
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.