| Literature DB >> 27271662 |
Elin Östman1, Anna Forslund2, Eden Tareke3, Inger Björck4.
Abstract
The nutritional quality of infant food is an important consideration in the effort to prevent a further increase in the rate of childhood obesity. We hypothesized that the canning of composite infant meals would lead to elevated contents of carboxymethyl-lysine (CML) and favor high glycemic and insulinemic responses compared with milder heat treatment conditions. We have compared composite infant pasta Bolognese meals that were either conventionally canned (CANPBol), or prepared by microwave cooking (MWPBol). A meal where the pasta and Bolognese sauce were separate during microwave cooking (MWP_CANBol) was also included. The infant meals were tested at breakfast in healthy adults using white wheat bread (WWB) as reference. A standardized lunch meal was served at 240 min and blood was collected from fasting to 360 min after breakfast. The 2-h glucose response (iAUC) was lower following the test meals than with WWB. The insulin response was lower after the MWP_CANBol (-47%, p = 0.0000) but markedly higher after CANPBol (+40%, p = 0.0019), compared with WWB. A combined measure of the glucose and insulin responses (ISIcomposite) revealed that MWP_CANBol resulted in 94% better insulin sensitivity than CANPBol. Additionally, the separate processing of the meal components in MWP_CANBol resulted in 39% lower CML levels than the CANPBol. It was therefore concluded that intake of commercially canned composite infant meals leads to reduced postprandial insulin sensitivity and increased exposure to oxidative stress promoting agents.Entities:
Keywords: advanced glycation end products; carbohydrate digestibility; carboxymethyl-lysine; early protein hypothesis; glycemia; glycemic index; human; infant food; insulinemia; protein quality
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27271662 PMCID: PMC4924181 DOI: 10.3390/nu8060340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
N-carboxymethyl-lysine (CML) content in canned and homogenized meals intended for infants and in frozen ready-to-eat meals intended for adults.
| Meal | CML (mg/g Protein) |
|---|---|
| Beef stew “Kalops” | |
| 0.33 | |
| 0.08 | |
| Hash “Pytt i panna” | |
| 0.45 | |
| 0.14 |
Results are presented as the mean of two duplicates.
Portion sizes and contents of macronutrients, energy, and CML in the test meals and reference meal in Study 2.
| Meal | Portion g | Starch g/Port | Protein g/Port | Fat 1 g/Port | Energy kJ/Port | CML 2,3 mg/Port |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WWB | 83 | 35 | 4.9 | 0.7 | 704 | 0.41 ± 0.04 a |
| CANPBol | 467 | 34 | 13 | 11.7 | 1232 | 9.75 ± 0.89 b |
| MWPBol | 479 | 36 | 15 | 11.5 | 1292 | 8.98 ± 0.13 b |
| MWP_CANBol of which: | 309 | 35 | 12 | 9.3 | 1143 | 5.94 ± 0.64 c |
| Canned Bolognese sauce | 130 | 3.3 | 7.3 | 8.9 | - | 5.94 ± 0.64 c |
| Pasta, uncooked | 42 | 30 | 4.4 | 0.4 | - | n.a. |
| Maize starch (Maizena) | 2 | 1.7 | - | - | - | n.a. |
1 Estimated from a previous study (WWB) and manufacturers’ declarations (commercial products/ingredients). WWB, white wheat bread; CANPBol, canned mixed meal; MWP_CANBol, canned Bolognese sauce served with microwave-cooked spaghetti; MWPBol, microwave-cooked mixed meal; n.a., not analyzed; 2 Values are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 4; 3 Values within the row not sharing a superscript letter are significantly different, p < 0.05.
Figure 1Mean (±SEM) changes in glucose response after the test meals and reference meal and the subsequent standardized lunch (Study 2).
Glucose and insulin responses 1, together with a measure of insulin sensitivity after the test meals and the reference meal (Study 2).
| WWB 2 | CANPBol 2 | Δ % | MWPBol 2 | Δ % | MWP_CANBol 2 | Δ % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | |||||||
| GI 0–120 min | 100 a | 79 ± 13 b | −21 | 61 ± 5.4 b | −39 | 38 ± 3.6 c | −62 |
| iAUC 0–45 min | 68.4 ± 6.13 a | 61.8 ± 5.30 a | −10 | 62.0 ± 3.40 a | −9 | 40.6 ± 4.31 b | −41 |
| iAUC 0–120 | 153 ± 16.0 a | 104 ± 13.7 b | −31 | 84.6 ± 10.3 b | −45 | 57.4 ± 7.7 c | −63 |
| iAUC 240–360 | 148 ± 18.5 a | 136 ± 16.3 a | −8 | 120 ± 12.4 a,b | −19 | 92.2 ± 13.1 b | −38 |
| iAUC 0–360 | 312 ± 30.8 a | 240 ± 31.9 a,b | −23 | 245 ± 37.9 b | −22 | 206 ± 33.3 b | −34 |
| Insulin | |||||||
| II 0–120 min | 100 a | 161 ± 19 b | 61 | 129 ± 15 a,b | 29 | 57 ± 5.5 c | −43 |
| iAUC 0–45 min | 5.11 ± 0.79 a | 8.10 ± 1.02 b | 59 | 7.15 ± 0.88 b | 40 | 4.01 ± 0.63 a | −22 |
| iAUC 0–120 | 11.3 ± 1.79 a | 15.8 ± 2.45 b | 40 | 12.4 ± 1.90 a,b | 10 | 5.95 ± 0.97 c | −47 |
| iAUC 0–360 | 26.4 ± 3.74 a | 32.2 ± 4.86 a | 22 | 26.5 ± 3.81 a | 0.2 | 20.2 ± 2.75 b | −24 |
| ISIcomposite | 703 ± 82 a | 733 ± 98 a | 4 | 865 ± 72 a | 23 | 1421 ± 135 b | 102 |
1 Values are presented as mean ± SEM; 2 Values within the same row not sharing superscript letters are significantly different, p < 0.05. GI, glycemic index; iAUC, incremental area under the curve; II, insulin index; ISIcomposite, insulin sensitivity index; WWB, white wheat bread; CANPBol, canned mixed meal; MWP_CANBol, canned Bolognese sauce served with microwave-cooked spaghetti; MWPBol, microwave-cooked mixed meal.
Figure 2Mean (±SEM) changes in insulin response after the intake of the test meals and reference meal, and subsequent standardized lunch (Study 2).
Figure 3Mean (±SEM) changes in triglyceride response after the intake of the test meals and reference meal, and a subsequent standardized lunch (Study 2).