Literature DB >> 27271208

Accessible bioprinting: adaptation of a low-cost 3D-printer for precise cell placement and stem cell differentiation.

John A Reid1, Peter A Mollica, Garett D Johnson, Roy C Ogle, Robert D Bruno, Patrick C Sachs.   

Abstract

The precision and repeatability offered by computer-aided design and computer-numerically controlled techniques in biofabrication processes is quickly becoming an industry standard. However, many hurdles still exist before these techniques can be used in research laboratories for cellular and molecular biology applications. Extrusion-based bioprinting systems have been characterized by high development costs, injector clogging, difficulty achieving small cell number deposits, decreased cell viability, and altered cell function post-printing. To circumvent the high-price barrier to entry of conventional bioprinters, we designed and 3D printed components for the adaptation of an inexpensive 'off-the-shelf' commercially available 3D printer. We also demonstrate via goal based computer simulations that the needle geometries of conventional commercially standardized, 'luer-lock' syringe-needle systems cause many of the issues plaguing conventional bioprinters. To address these performance limitations we optimized flow within several microneedle geometries, which revealed a short tapered injector design with minimal cylindrical needle length was ideal to minimize cell strain and accretion. We then experimentally quantified these geometries using pulled glass microcapillary pipettes and our modified, low-cost 3D printer. This systems performance validated our models exhibiting: reduced clogging, single cell print resolution, and maintenance of cell viability without the use of a sacrificial vehicle. Using this system we show the successful printing of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) into Geltrex and note their retention of a pluripotent state 7 d post printing. We also show embryoid body differentiation of hiPSC by injection into differentiation conducive environments, wherein we observed continuous growth, emergence of various evaginations, and post-printing gene expression indicative of the presence of all three germ layers. These data demonstrate an accessible open-source 3D bioprinter capable of serving the needs of any laboratory interested in 3D cellular interactions and tissue engineering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27271208     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/8/2/025017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  20 in total

1.  3D bioprinted mammary organoids and tumoroids in human mammary derived ECM hydrogels.

Authors:  Peter A Mollica; Elizabeth N Booth-Creech; John A Reid; Martina Zamponi; Shea M Sullivan; Xavier-Lewis Palmer; Patrick C Sachs; Robert D Bruno
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  3D bioprinter applied picosecond pulsed electric fields for targeted manipulation of proliferation and lineage specific gene expression in neural stem cells.

Authors:  Ross A Petrella; Peter A Mollica; Martina Zamponi; John A Reid; Shu Xiao; Robert D Bruno; Patrick C Sachs
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Embedded Multimaterial Extrusion Bioprinting.

Authors:  Marco Rocca; Alessio Fragasso; Wanjun Liu; Marcel A Heinrich; Yu Shrike Zhang
Journal:  SLAS Technol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.047

4.  A hackable, multi-functional, and modular extrusion 3D printer for soft materials.

Authors:  Iek Man Lei; Yaqi Sheng; Chon Lok Lei; Cillian Leow; Yan Yan Shery Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Emerging Technologies in Multi-Material Bioprinting.

Authors:  Hossein Ravanbakhsh; Vahid Karamzadeh; Guangyu Bao; Luc Mongeau; David Juncker; Yu Shrike Zhang
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 32.086

Review 6.  3D bioprinting of functional tissue models for personalized drug screening and in vitro disease modeling.

Authors:  Xuanyi Ma; Justin Liu; Wei Zhu; Min Tang; Natalie Lawrence; Claire Yu; Maling Gou; Shaochen Chen
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 7.  Modeling colorectal cancers using multidimensional organoids.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Sayed; Amer Ali Abd El-Hafeez; Priti P Maity; Soumita Das; Pradipta Ghosh
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 6.242

Review 8.  Tissue specific microenvironments: a key tool for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Patrick C Sachs; Peter A Mollica; Robert D Bruno
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 9.  3D Printing Techniques and Their Applications to Organ-on-a-Chip Platforms: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Violeta Carvalho; Inês Gonçalves; Teresa Lage; Raquel O Rodrigues; Graça Minas; Senhorinha F C F Teixeira; Ana S Moita; Takeshi Hori; Hirokazu Kaji; Rui A Lima
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Bioengineering platforms for cell therapeutics derived from pluripotent and direct reprogramming.

Authors:  Yoonhee Jin; Seung-Woo Cho
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2021-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.