Literature DB >> 27270515

Operative Method for Transverse Colon Carcinoma: Transverse Colectomy Versus Extended Colectomy.

Choon Seng Chong1, Jung Wook Huh, Bo Young Oh, Yoon Ah Park, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The type of surgery performed for primary transverse colon cancer varies based on tumor characteristics and surgeon perspective. The optimal oncological outcome following different surgical options has not been clearly established, and transverse colectomy has shown oncological equivalence only in small cohort studies.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare long-term oncological outcomes after transverse colectomy versus extended resection for transverse colon cancer.
DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data.
SETTING: This study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital.
METHOD: All patients treated for transverse colon cancer at the Samsung Medical Center between 1995 and 2013 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oncological outcomes were compared between 2 groups of patients: a transverse colectomy group and an extended colectomy group (which included extended right hemicolectomy and left hemicolectomy).
RESULTS: A total of 1066 patients were included, of whom 750 (70.4%) underwent extended right hemicolectomy, 127 (11.9%) underwent transverse colectomy, and 189 (17.7%) underwent left hemicolectomy. According to univariate analysis, surgical approach, histological type, tumor morphology, cancer T and N stage, cancer size, and lymphovascular invasion were significant factors contributing to disease-free survival (DFS). However, as seen in multivariate analysis, only node-positive disease (HR = 2.035 (1.188-3.484)), tumors with ulcerative morphology (HR = 3.643 (1.132-11.725)), and the presence of vascular invasion (HR = 2.569 (1.455-4.538)) were significant factors for DFS. Further analysis with a propensity-matched cohort between the transverse and extended colectomy groups demonstrated no significant differences in DFS and overall survival. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited because it was performed at a single institution and it was retrospective in nature.
CONCLUSION: In terms of perioperative and oncological outcomes, transverse colectomy and extended colectomy did not differ despite a shorter specimen length and fewer lymph nodes harvested in the transverse colectomy group. Independent prognostic factors for DFS were node-positive disease, the presence of vascular invasion, and ulcerative morphology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27270515     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  10 in total

1.  Bowel function recovery after laparoscopic transverse colectomy within an ERAS program: a comparison to right and left colectomy.

Authors:  Raffaello Roesel; Francesco Mongelli; Costanza Ajani; Fabiano Iaquinandi; Diana Celio; Dimitri Christoforidis
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy versus laparoscopic transverse colectomy for mid-transverse colon cancer: a multicenter retrospective study from Kanagawa Yokohama Colorectal Cancer (KYCC) study group.

Authors:  Kenta Iguchi; Masakatsu Numata; Manabu Shiozawa; Keisuke Kazama; Sho Sawazaki; Yusuke Katayama; Koji Numata; Sumito Sato; Akio Higuchi; Nobuhiro Sugano; Hiroyuki Mushiake; Yasushi Rino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Laparoscopic transverse colectomy with extended complete mesocolic excision for mid-transverse colon cancer.

Authors:  G N Piozzi; S M Rusli; J M Choo; J S Kim; S H Kim
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.699

4.  A Transverse Colectomy is as Safe as an Extended Right or Left Colectomy for Mid-Transverse Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Lieve G J Leijssen; Anne M Dinaux; Ramzi Amri; Hiroko Kunitake; Liliana G Bordeianou; David L Berger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Optimal Surgery for Mid-Transverse Colon Cancer: Laparoscopic Extended Right Hemicolectomy Versus Laparoscopic Transverse Colectomy.

Authors:  Takeru Matsuda; Yasuo Sumi; Kimihiro Yamashita; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Masashi Yamamoto; Yoshiko Matsuda; Shingo Kanaji; Taro Oshikiri; Tetsu Nakamura; Satoshi Suzuki; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Primary tumor resection improves prognosis of unresectable carcinomas of the transverse colon including flexures with liver metastasis: a preliminary population-based analysis.

Authors:  Jiefeng Zhao; Jinfeng Zhu; Rui Sun; Chao Huang; Rongfa Yuan; Zhengming Zhu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Treatment of splenic flexure colon cancer: a comparison of three different surgical procedures: Experience of a high volume cancer center.

Authors:  Daniela Rega; Ugo Pace; Dario Scala; Paolo Chiodini; Vincenza Granata; Andrea Fares Bucci; Biagio Pecori; Paolo Delrio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Segmental transverse colectomy. Minimally invasive versus open approach: results from a multicenter collaborative study.

Authors:  Marco Milone; Maurizio Degiuli; Nunzio Velotti; Michele Manigrasso; Sara Vertaldi; Domenico D'Ugo; Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-09-14

9.  Laparoscopic segmental colectomy with extensive D3 lymph node dissection: a good choice for right transverse colon cancer.

Authors:  Xing Huang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 10.  What is the best surgical procedure of transverse colon cancer? An evidence map and minireview.

Authors:  Chen Li; Quan Wang; Ke-Wei Jiang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-05-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.