Adam Bobkiewicz1, Joanna Cwykiel2, Maria Siemionow2,1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Gastroenterological Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Selection of an appropriate model for preclinical assessment of new methods of peripheral nerve injury management is crucial. This report presents anatomic variations within brachial and lumbosacral plexuses in three selected rat strains Sprague Dawley (Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD), Lewis (LEW/SsNHsd), and Athymic Nude (Hsd:RH-Foxn1rnu ) rats. METHODS: Based on their strain eighteen rats were divided into three groups. A total of 90 brachial plexus nerves (axillary, musculocutaneous, median, ulnar, and radial nerves) and 72 lumbosacral plexus nerves (sciatic, tibial, common peroneal, and sural nerves) were analyzed for the length, diameter and correlation with the body weight. A detailed anatomic course of each nerve within the brachial and lumbosacral plexuses was outlined. RESULTS: The sural nerve was the longest nerve in all studied rat strains, whereas the sciatic nerve had the largest diameter. Comparison of all the nerves' length demonstrated that the Lewis rat sciatic and sural nerves were significantly shorter (P < 0.05). No significant differences in nerve diameters were found among the analyzed rat strain groups. Significant correlation was revealed between the length of sciatic nerve and the rats' weight, which is irrelevant to the rats' genetic background. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that nerves' length within rat's brachial and lumbosacral plexus depends on the inter-individual variations within the rat strains rather than on the differences in the peripheral nerve development, which is inherent to the specific rat strain. Correlation between the nerve length and body weight, suggests that bigger rats should be considered for studies requiring access to the long nerves.
PURPOSE: Selection of an appropriate model for preclinical assessment of new methods of peripheral nerve injury management is crucial. This report presents anatomic variations within brachial and lumbosacral plexuses in three selected rat strains Sprague Dawley (Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD), Lewis (LEW/SsNHsd), and Athymic Nude (Hsd:RH-Foxn1rnu ) rats. METHODS: Based on their strain eighteen rats were divided into three groups. A total of 90 brachial plexus nerves (axillary, musculocutaneous, median, ulnar, and radial nerves) and 72 lumbosacral plexus nerves (sciatic, tibial, common peroneal, and sural nerves) were analyzed for the length, diameter and correlation with the body weight. A detailed anatomic course of each nerve within the brachial and lumbosacral plexuses was outlined. RESULTS: The sural nerve was the longest nerve in all studied rat strains, whereas the sciatic nerve had the largest diameter. Comparison of all the nerves' length demonstrated that the Lewis rat sciatic and sural nerves were significantly shorter (P < 0.05). No significant differences in nerve diameters were found among the analyzed rat strain groups. Significant correlation was revealed between the length of sciatic nerve and the rats' weight, which is irrelevant to the rats' genetic background. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that nerves' length within rat's brachial and lumbosacral plexus depends on the inter-individual variations within the rat strains rather than on the differences in the peripheral nerve development, which is inherent to the specific rat strain. Correlation between the nerve length and body weight, suggests that bigger rats should be considered for studies requiring access to the long nerves.
Authors: Francisco Javier Vela; Guadalupe Martínez-Chacón; Alberto Ballestín; José Luis Campos; Francisco Miguel Sánchez-Margallo; Elena Abellán Journal: Neural Regen Res Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 5.135
Authors: Rui Sergio Monteiro de Barros; Deivid Ramos Dos Santos; Renan Kleber Costa Teixeira; Nayara Pontes de Araújo; Danusa Neves Somensi; Atylla de Andrade Candido Journal: Acta Cir Bras Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 1.564