PURPOSE: Posterior fossa ependymoma comprises two distinct molecular variants termed EPN_PFA and EPN_PFB that have a distinct biology and natural history. The therapeutic value of cytoreductive surgery and radiation therapy for posterior fossa ependymoma after accounting for molecular subgroup is not known. METHODS: Four independent nonoverlapping retrospective cohorts of posterior fossa ependymomas (n = 820) were profiled using genome-wide methylation arrays. Risk stratification models were designed based on known clinical and newly described molecular biomarkers identified by multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: Molecular subgroup is a powerful independent predictor of outcome even when accounting for age or treatment regimen. Incompletely resected EPN_PFA ependymomas have a dismal prognosis, with a 5-year progression-free survival ranging from 26.1% to 56.8% across all four cohorts. Although first-line (adjuvant) radiation is clearly beneficial for completely resected EPN_PFA, a substantial proportion of patients with EPN_PFB can be cured with surgery alone, and patients with relapsed EPN_PFB can often be treated successfully with delayed external-beam irradiation. CONCLUSION: The most impactful biomarker for posterior fossa ependymoma is molecular subgroup affiliation, independent of other demographic or treatment variables. However, both EPN_PFA and EPN_PFB still benefit from increased extent of resection, with the survival rates being particularly poor for subtotally resected EPN_PFA, even with adjuvant radiation therapy. Patients with EPN_PFB who undergo gross total resection are at lower risk for relapse and should be considered for inclusion in a randomized clinical trial of observation alone with radiation reserved for those who experience recurrence.
PURPOSE: Posterior fossa ependymoma comprises two distinct molecular variants termed EPN_PFA and EPN_PFB that have a distinct biology and natural history. The therapeutic value of cytoreductive surgery and radiation therapy for posterior fossa ependymoma after accounting for molecular subgroup is not known. METHODS: Four independent nonoverlapping retrospective cohorts of posterior fossa ependymomas (n = 820) were profiled using genome-wide methylation arrays. Risk stratification models were designed based on known clinical and newly described molecular biomarkers identified by multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. RESULTS: Molecular subgroup is a powerful independent predictor of outcome even when accounting for age or treatment regimen. Incompletely resected EPN_PFA ependymomas have a dismal prognosis, with a 5-year progression-free survival ranging from 26.1% to 56.8% across all four cohorts. Although first-line (adjuvant) radiation is clearly beneficial for completely resected EPN_PFA, a substantial proportion of patients with EPN_PFB can be cured with surgery alone, and patients with relapsed EPN_PFB can often be treated successfully with delayed external-beam irradiation. CONCLUSION: The most impactful biomarker for posterior fossa ependymoma is molecular subgroup affiliation, independent of other demographic or treatment variables. However, both EPN_PFA and EPN_PFB still benefit from increased extent of resection, with the survival rates being particularly poor for subtotally resected EPN_PFA, even with adjuvant radiation therapy. Patients with EPN_PFB who undergo gross total resection are at lower risk for relapse and should be considered for inclusion in a randomized clinical trial of observation alone with radiation reserved for those who experience recurrence.
Authors: Matthew Koshy; Shayna Rich; Thomas E Merchant; Usama Mahmood; William F Regine; Young Kwok Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2011-06-03 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Mariko DeWire; Maryam Fouladi; David C Turner; Cynthia Wetmore; Cynthia Hawkins; Carmen Jacobs; Ying Yuan; Diane Liu; Stewart Goldman; Paul Fisher; Michael Rytting; Eric Bouffet; Yasmin Khakoo; Eugene I Hwang; Nicholas Foreman; Clinton F Stewart; Mark R Gilbert; Richard Gilbertson; Amar Gajjar Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Hendrik Witt; Stephen C Mack; Marina Ryzhova; Sebastian Bender; Martin Sill; Ruth Isserlin; Axel Benner; Thomas Hielscher; Till Milde; Marc Remke; David T W Jones; Paul A Northcott; Livia Garzia; Kelsey C Bertrand; Andrea Wittmann; Yuan Yao; Stephen S Roberts; Luca Massimi; Tim Van Meter; William A Weiss; Nalin Gupta; Wiesia Grajkowska; Boleslaw Lach; Yoon-Jae Cho; Andreas von Deimling; Andreas E Kulozik; Olaf Witt; Gary D Bader; Cynthia E Hawkins; Uri Tabori; Abhijit Guha; James T Rutka; Peter Lichter; Andrey Korshunov; Michael D Taylor; Stefan M Pfister Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2011-08-16 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Thomas E Merchant; Yunping Zhu; Stephen J Thompson; Marc R Sontag; Richard L Heideman; Larry E Kun Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Pooja Panwalkar; Jonathan Clark; Vijay Ramaswamy; Debra Hawes; Fusheng Yang; Christopher Dunham; Stephen Yip; Juliette Hukin; Yilun Sun; Matthew J Schipper; Lukas Chavez; Ashley Margol; Melike Pekmezci; Chan Chung; Adam Banda; Jill M Bayliss; Sarah J Curry; Mariarita Santi; Fausto J Rodriguez; Matija Snuderl; Matthias A Karajannis; Amanda M Saratsis; Craig M Horbinski; Anne-Sophie Carret; Beverly Wilson; Donna Johnston; Lucie Lafay-Cousin; Shayna Zelcer; David Eisenstat; Marianna Silva; Katrin Scheinemann; Nada Jabado; P Daniel McNeely; Marcel Kool; Stefan M Pfister; Michael D Taylor; Cynthia Hawkins; Andrey Korshunov; Alexander R Judkins; Sriram Venneti Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Jens-Martin Hübner; Torsten Müller; Dimitris N Papageorgiou; Monika Mauermann; Jeroen Krijgsveld; Robert B Russell; David W Ellison; Stefan M Pfister; Kristian W Pajtler; Marcel Kool Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-07-11 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Michal Zapotocky; Kiran Beera; Jenny Adamski; Normand Laperierre; Sharon Guger; Laura Janzen; Alvaro Lassaletta; Liana Figueiredo Nobre; Ute Bartels; Uri Tabori; Cynthia Hawkins; Stacey Urbach; Derek S Tsang; Peter B Dirks; Michael D Taylor; Eric Bouffet; Donald J Mabbott; Vijay Ramaswamy Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Santhosh A Upadhyaya; Giles W Robinson; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Brent A Orr; Catherine A Billups; Daniel C Bowers; Anne E Bendel; Tim Hassall; John R Crawford; Sonia Partap; Paul G Fisher; Ruth G Tatevossian; Tiffany Seah; Ibrahim A Qaddoumi; Anna Vinitsky; Gregory T Armstrong; Noah D Sabin; Christopher L Tinkle; Paul Klimo; Danny J Indelicato; Frederick A Boop; Thomas E Merchant; David W Ellison; Amar Gajjar Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Scott Ryall; Miguel Guzman; Samer K Elbabaa; Betty Luu; Stephen C Mack; Michal Zapotocky; Michael D Taylor; Cynthia Hawkins; Vijay Ramaswamy Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Eveline Teresa Hidalgo; Matija Snuderl; Cordelia Orillac; Svetlana Kvint; Jonathan Serrano; Peter Wu; Matthias A Karajannis; Sharon L Gardner Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Derek S Tsang; Louise Murray; Vijay Ramaswamy; Michal Zapotocky; Uri Tabori; Ute Bartels; Annie Huang; Peter B Dirks; Michael D Taylor; Cynthia Hawkins; Eric Bouffet; Normand Laperriere Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 12.300