Literature DB >> 27269585

Gender Differences in In-Hospital Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Rajesh V Swaminathan1, Dmitriy N Feldman2, Raymond A Pashun2, Rupa K Patil2, Tara Shah2, Joshua D Geleris2, Shing-Chiu Wong2, Leonard N Girardi3, Mario Gaudino4, Robert M Minutello2, Harsimran S Singh2, Geoffrey Bergman2, Luke K Kim2.   

Abstract

Women historically have a greater risk of operative mortality than men after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). There is paucity of contemporary data in gender outcomes of surgical revascularization and understanding modifiable factors that contribute to gender differences are critical for quality improvement and practice change. We, therefore, sought to examine whether the gender gap in CABG outcomes is closing in the contemporary era by conducting a retrospective analysis from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2003 to 2012. We included all patients who underwent isolated CABG surgery (n = 2,272,998; female n = 623,423 [27.4%]; male n = 1,649,575 [72.6%]). The annual rate of CABG surgeries decreased by 53.7% in men and 57.8% in women over the 10-year study period. Although internal mammary artery use in women was less frequent than in men in 2003 (77.4% vs 81.9%, p <0.001), a significant uptrend closed this gap by 2012 (86.2% vs 87.0%, ptrend 0.003). Overall, unadjusted in-hospital mortality was greater in women (3.2% vs 1.8%, p <0.001). Female gender remained an independent predictor of mortality after multivariate adjustment (odds ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.43, p <0.001) across all age groups. However, in-hospital mortality decreased at a faster rate in women (3.8% to 2.7%, RR -29.1%, ptrend 0.002) than in men (2.2% to 1.6%, RR -25.7%, ptrend <0.001) from 2003 to 2012. In conclusion, CABG rates in the United States are decreasing over time, yet in-hospital mortality continues to improve. Women have worse in-hospital outcomes than men; however, the gender gap is slowly closing.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27269585     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  14 in total

1.  Female gender and left ventricular dysfunction in myocardial surgical revascularization: the strange couple.

Authors:  Luigi Di Tommaso; Raffaele Giordano; Ettorino Di Tommaso; Gabriele Iannelli
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Acute Coronary Syndromes: Differences in Men and Women.

Authors:  Kris R Kawamoto; Melinda B Davis; Claire S Duvernoy
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Gender and coronary artery bypass grafting in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Marcin P Szczechowicz; Sabreen Mkalaluh; Saeed Torabi; Jerry Easo; Matthias Karck; Alexander Weymann
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-08-12

Review 4.  Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease in Women.

Authors:  Emily Perdoncin; Claire Duvernoy
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

5.  Differences among sexes in presentation and outcomes in acute type A aortic dissection repair.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Norton; Karen M Kim; Shinichi Fukuhara; Xiaoting Wu; Himanshu J Patel; G Michael Deeb; Bo Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 6.439

Review 6.  Perspectives of Post-Acute Transition of Care for Cardiac Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Nicoleta Stoicea; Tian You; Andrew Eiterman; Clifton Hartwell; Victor Davila; Stephen Marjoribanks; Cristina Florescu; Sergio Daniel Bergese; Barbara Rogers
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-11-27

7.  Assessment of three risk evaluation systems for patients aged ≥70 in East China: performance of SinoSCORE, EuroSCORE II and the STS risk evaluation system.

Authors:  Lingtong Shan; Wen Ge; Yiwei Pu; Hong Cheng; Zhengqiang Cang; Xing Zhang; Qifan Li; Anyang Xu; Qi Wang; Chang Gu; Yangyang Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Sex-specific risk factors for early mortality and survival after surgery of acute aortic dissection type a: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Christine Friedrich; Mohamed Ahmed Salem; Thomas Puehler; Grischa Hoffmann; Georg Lutter; Jochen Cremer; Assad Haneya
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Prognostic Differences between Men and Women with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Data from a Brazilian Registry.

Authors:  Alexandre de Matos Soeiro; Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros E Silva; Eduardo Alberto de Castro Roque; Aline Siqueira Bossa; Bruno Biselli; Tatiana de Carvalho Andreucci Torres Leal; Maria Carolina Feres de Almeida Soeiro; Fábio Grunspun Pitta; Carlos V Serrano; Múcio Tavares Oliveira
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Sex Differences in Acute Complications of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Implications for Patient Safety.

Authors:  Katherine Moore; Anand Ganesan; Clementine Labrosciano; William Heddle; Andrew McGavigan; Sadia Hossain; Dennis Horton; Saranya Hariharaputhiran; Isuru Ranasinghe
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.