Literature DB >> 27268157

Surveillance systems and methods for monitoring the post-marketing safety of influenza vaccines at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Pedro L Moro1, Rongxia Li1, Penina Haber1, Eric Weintraub1, Maria Cano1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Annual influenza vaccine safety monitoring is an important component of the influenza vaccination program in the United States to ensure that vaccines are safe, which is important for maintaining public trust in the national vaccination program. This is specially the case for influenza vaccines since the antigen composition of the viruses of which the vaccine is made often changes from one season to the next, based on the circulating strain of influenza virus. AREAS COVERED: This review describes the two surveillance systems used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to monitor the safety of influenza vaccines: 1) the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS); and 2) the Vaccine Safety datalink (VSD). EXPERT OPINION: VAERS and VSD are used routinely to monitor the safety of influenza vaccines in the United States, and over the years they have demonstrated their value in monitoring vaccine safety since their implementation in 1990. Both systems, although different, complemented each other well to study febrile seizures in young children following influenza vaccination during the 2010-2011 influenza season. Other examples of potential safety concerns after influenza vaccines are also presented and discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; VAERS; VSD; influenza vaccine; surveillance; vaccine safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27268157      PMCID: PMC6500454          DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2016.1194823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf        ISSN: 1474-0338            Impact factor:   4.250


  7 in total

1.  Myopericarditis After COVID-19 Booster Dose Vaccination.

Authors:  Katie A Sharff; David M Dancoes; Jodi L Longueil; Paul F Lewis; Eric S Johnson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.133

2.  Value of an in-depth analysis of unpublished data on the safety of influenza vaccines in pregnant women.

Authors:  Neal A Halsey; Tina Proveaux
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Influenza vaccines: Evaluation of the safety profile.

Authors:  Claudia Maria Trombetta; Elena Gianchecchi; Emanuele Montomoli
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  The use of technology to promote vaccination: A social ecological model based framework.

Authors:  Chelsea A Kolff; Vanessa P Scott; Melissa S Stockwell
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Enhanced Passive Safety Surveillance (EPSS) confirms an optimal safety profile of the use of MF59® -adjuvanted influenza vaccine in older adults: Results from three consecutive seasons.

Authors:  Donatella Panatto; Mendel Haag; Piero Luigi Lai; Sylvie Tomczyk; Daniela Amicizia; Maria Maddalena Lino
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 6.  Challenges in implementing yearly enhanced safety surveillance of influenza vaccination in Europe: lessons learned and future perspectives.

Authors:  Gaël Dos Santos
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Current Approaches to Vaccine Safety Using Observational Data: A Rationale for the EUMAEUS (Evaluating Use of Methods for Adverse Events Under Surveillance-for Vaccines) Study Design.

Authors:  Lana Yh Lai; Faaizah Arshad; Carlos Areia; Thamir M Alshammari; Heba Alghoul; Paula Casajust; Xintong Li; Dalia Dawoud; Fredrik Nyberg; Nicole Pratt; George Hripcsak; Marc A Suchard; Dani Prieto-Alhambra; Patrick Ryan; Martijn J Schuemie
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 5.810

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.