Literature DB >> 27268087

Mutational hierarchies in myelodysplastic syndromes dynamically adapt and evolve upon therapy response and failure.

Maximilian Mossner1, Johann-Christoph Jann1, Janina Wittig1, Florian Nolte1, Stephanie Fey1, Verena Nowak1, Julia Obländer1, Jovita Pressler1, Iris Palme1, Christina Xanthopoulos1, Tobias Boch1, Georgia Metzgeroth1, Henning Röhl2, Stephanie H Witt3, Helene Dukal3, Corinna Klein4, Steffen Schmitt5, Patrick Gelß6, Uwe Platzbecker7, Ekaterina Balaian7, Alice Fabarius1, Helmut Blum8, Torsten J Schulze9, Manja Meggendorfer10, Claudia Haferlach10, Andreas Trumpp11, Wolf-Karsten Hofmann1, Hind Medyouf12, Daniel Nowak1.   

Abstract

Clonal evolution is believed to be a main driver for progression of various types of cancer and implicated in facilitating resistance to drugs. However, the hierarchical organization of malignant clones in the hematopoiesis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and its impact on response to drug therapy remain poorly understood. Using high-throughput sequencing of patient and xenografted cells, we evaluated the intratumoral heterogeneity (n= 54) and reconstructed mutational trajectories (n = 39) in patients suffering from MDS (n = 52) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia-1 (n = 2). We identified linear and also branching evolution paths and confirmed on a patient-specific level that somatic mutations in epigenetic regulators and RNA splicing genes frequently constitute isolated disease-initiating events. Using high-throughput exome- and/or deep-sequencing, we analyzed 103 chronologically acquired samples from 22 patients covering a cumulative observation time of 75 years MDS disease progression. Our data revealed highly dynamic shaping of complex oligoclonal architectures, specifically upon treatment with lenalidomide and other drugs. Despite initial clinical response to treatment, patients' marrow persistently remained clonal with rapid outgrowth of founder-, sub-, or even fully independent clones, indicating an increased dynamic rate of clonal turnover. The emergence and disappearance of specific clones frequently correlated with changes of clinical parameters, highlighting their distinct and far-reaching functional properties. Intriguingly, increasingly complex mutational trajectories are frequently accompanied by clinical progression during the course of disease. These data substantiate a need for regular broad molecular monitoring to guide clinical treatment decisions in MDS.
© 2016 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27268087     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-11-679167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  44 in total

1.  CD123 CAR T cells for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Brett M Stevens; Wei Zhang; Daniel A Pollyea; Amanda Winters; Jonathan Gutman; Clayton Smith; Elizabeth Budde; Stephen J Forman; Craig T Jordan; Enkhtsetseg Purev
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 2.  Stem and progenitor cell alterations in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Aditi Shastri; Britta Will; Ulrich Steidl; Amit Verma
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Myelodysplastic syndrome can propagate from the multipotent progenitor compartment.

Authors:  Kevin Rouault-Pierre; Alexander E Smith; Syed A Mian; Irene Pizzitola; Austin G Kulasekararaj; Ghulam J Mufti; Dominique Bonnet
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Molecular Testing in Patients with Suspected Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Authors:  Tamara K Moyo; Michael R Savona
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.952

5.  Getting personal with myelodysplastic syndromes: is now the right time?

Authors:  Nora Chokr; Alexander B Pine; Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Rory M Shallis; Maximilian Stahl; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.929

6.  Subclones dominate at MDS progression following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant.

Authors:  Meagan A Jacoby; Eric J Duncavage; Gue Su Chang; Christopher A Miller; Jin Shao; Kevin Elliott; Joshua Robinson; Robert S Fulton; Catrina C Fronick; Michelle O'Laughlin; Sharon E Heath; Iskra Pusic; John S Welch; Daniel C Link; John F DiPersio; Peter Westervelt; Timothy J Ley; Timothy A Graubert; Matthew J Walter
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-03-08

Review 7.  Implications of molecular genetic diversity in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Rafael Bejar
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.284

8.  Emergence and evolution of TP53 mutations are key features of disease progression in myelodysplastic patients with lower-risk del(5q) treated with lenalidomide.

Authors:  Laurence Lodé; Audrey Ménard; Laurent Flet; Steven Richebourg; Marion Loirat; Marion Eveillard; Yannick Le Bris; Catherine Godon; Olivier Theisen; Anne-Laure Gagez; Guillaume Cartron; Thérèse Commes-Maerten; Bruno Villemagne; Odile Luycx; Pascal Godmer; Catherine Pellat-Deceunynck; Thierry Soussi; Marie C Béné; Jacques Delaunay; Pierre Peterlin
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  Prognostic significance of serial molecular annotation in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML).

Authors:  Seongseok Yun; Susan M Geyer; Rami S Komrokji; Najla H Al Ali; Jinming Song; Mohammad Hussaini; Kendra L Sweet; Jeffrey E Lancet; Alan F List; Eric Padron; David A Sallman
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  High NPM1-mutant allele burden at diagnosis predicts unfavorable outcomes in de novo AML.

Authors:  Sanjay S Patel; Frank C Kuo; Christopher J Gibson; David P Steensma; Robert J Soiffer; Edwin P Alyea; Yi-Bin A Chen; Amir T Fathi; Timothy A Graubert; Andrew M Brunner; Martha Wadleigh; Richard M Stone; Daniel J DeAngelo; Valentina Nardi; Robert P Hasserjian; Olga K Weinberg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.