Pratibha Nayak1, Terry F Pechacek2, Scott R Weaver3, Michael P Eriksen2. 1. Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: pnayak@gsu.edu. 2. Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Division of Health Management & Policy, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS), School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Division of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are popular among cigarette smokers; however, it is not known whether the use of ENDS assists or delays quitting cigarettes, especially among certain priority populations. We examined predictors of intention to quit smoking and patterns of dual use of ENDS and traditional cigarettes among priority populations. METHODS: This study used data from a 2014 survey of a national probability sample of 5717 USA adults. Descriptive statistics were used to examine differences in intention to quit cigarette use among current cigarette smokers (n=1014) and dual users of cigarettes and ENDS (n=248). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted on the overall sample and the subsample of dual users to determine whether dual use (versus cigarette only use) and demographic characteristics predict self-reported intention to quit and having attempted to quit in the past year. Significance was set at p<0.05. RESULTS: Compared to cigarette smokers, dual users were slightly more educated (p<0.05), more likely to intend to quit smoking (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.8, p=0.001), and more likely to have attempted to quit smoking in the past year (AOR=1.7, p=0.003). Blacks reported higher intention to quit than Whites (AOR=1.8, p=0.003). Compared with high school education or less, dual users with some college (AOR=1.5, p=0.007) or a college degree (AOR=2.5, p≤0.0001) had high intention to quit. CONCLUSIONS: Dual users of ENDS and traditional cigarettes are more likely to intend to quit smoking and have recently made quit attempts. If using ENDS contributes to increased smoking cessation among more educated individuals, disparity in smoking by level of education will increase.
INTRODUCTION: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are popular among cigarette smokers; however, it is not known whether the use of ENDS assists or delays quitting cigarettes, especially among certain priority populations. We examined predictors of intention to quit smoking and patterns of dual use of ENDS and traditional cigarettes among priority populations. METHODS: This study used data from a 2014 survey of a national probability sample of 5717 USA adults. Descriptive statistics were used to examine differences in intention to quit cigarette use among current cigarette smokers (n=1014) and dual users of cigarettes and ENDS (n=248). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted on the overall sample and the subsample of dual users to determine whether dual use (versus cigarette only use) and demographic characteristics predict self-reported intention to quit and having attempted to quit in the past year. Significance was set at p<0.05. RESULTS: Compared to cigarette smokers, dual users were slightly more educated (p<0.05), more likely to intend to quit smoking (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.8, p=0.001), and more likely to have attempted to quit smoking in the past year (AOR=1.7, p=0.003). Blacks reported higher intention to quit than Whites (AOR=1.8, p=0.003). Compared with high school education or less, dual users with some college (AOR=1.5, p=0.007) or a college degree (AOR=2.5, p≤0.0001) had high intention to quit. CONCLUSIONS: Dual users of ENDS and traditional cigarettes are more likely to intend to quit smoking and have recently made quit attempts. If using ENDS contributes to increased smoking cessation among more educated individuals, disparity in smoking by level of education will increase.
Authors: Robert C McMillen; Mark A Gottlieb; Regina M Whitmore Shaefer; Jonathan P Winickoff; Jonathan D Klein Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Lila J Finney Rutten; Kelly D Blake; Amenah A Agunwamba; Rachel A Grana; Patrick M Wilson; Jon O Ebbert; Janet Okamoto; Scott J Leischow Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Katrina A Vickerman; Kelly M Carpenter; Tamara Altman; Chelsea M Nash; Susan M Zbikowski Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: R S Caraballo; G A Giovino; T F Pechacek; P D Mowery; P A Richter; W J Strauss; D J Sharp; M P Eriksen; J L Pirkle; K R Maurer Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-07-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Israel T Agaku; Brian A King; Corinne G Husten; Rebecca Bunnell; Bridget K Ambrose; S Sean Hu; Enver Holder-Hayes; Hannah R Day Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2014-06-27 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Jenny E Ozga-Hess; Nicholas J Felicione; Stuart G Ferguson; Geri Dino; Daniel Elswick; Catherine Whitworth; Nicholas Turiano; Melissa D Blank Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Jennie Z Ma; Joy L Hart; Kandi L Walker; Aida L Giachello; Allison Groom; Robyn L Landry; Lindsay K Tompkins; Thanh-Huyen T Vu; Delvon T Mattingly; Clara G Sears; Anshula Kesh; Michael E Hall; Rose Marie Robertson; Thomas J Payne Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Daniel Owusu; Jocelyn Aibangbee; Candice Collins; Crystal Robertson; Liang Wang; Mary A Littleton; Rafie Boghozian; Vicki Casenburg; Hadii M Mamudu Journal: J Community Health Date: 2017-06
Authors: Emara Nabi-Burza; Susan Regan; Bethany Hipple Walters; Jeremy E Drehmer; Nancy A Rigotti; Deborah J Ossip; Julie A Gorzkowski; Douglas E Levy; Jonathan P Winickoff Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Stephen T Higgins; Allison N Kurti; Marissa Palmer; Jennifer W Tidey; Antonio Cepeda-Benito; Maria R Cooper; Nicolle M Krebs; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati; Joy L Hart; Cassandra A Stanton Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Úrsula Martínez; Víctor Martínez-Loredo; Vani N Simmons; Lauren R Meltzer; David J Drobes; Karen O Brandon; Amanda M Palmer; Thomas Eissenberg; Christopher R Bullen; Paul T Harrell; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Sulamunn R M Coleman; Janice Y Bunn; Tyler D Nighbor; Allison N Kurti; Hypatia A Bolívar; Rachel F Tyndale; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Prev Med Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 4.018