| Literature DB >> 27267906 |
Yujiro Sano1, Roger Antabe2, Kilian Nasung Atuoye2, Lucia Kafui Hussey2, Jason Bayne2, Sylvester Zackaria Galaa3, Paul Mkandawire4, Isaac Luginaah5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of HIV in Malawi is one of the highest in sub-Saharan Africa, and misconceptions about its mode of transmission are considered a major contributor to the continued spread of the virus.Entities:
Keywords: Gender; HIV/AIDS Misconceptions; Malawi; Sub-Saharan Africa
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27267906 PMCID: PMC4896031 DOI: 10.1186/s12914-016-0089-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Int Health Hum Rights ISSN: 1472-698X
Univariate analysis of selected dependent and independent variables
| Women (%) | Men (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Misconceptions about HIV transmission | ||
| Not endorsing any misconception | 55.4 | 62.8 |
| Endorsing at least one misconception | 44.6 | 37.2 |
| ABC prevention knowledge (median) | 0.70 | 0.73 |
| Have been tested for AIDS | ||
| No | 25.3 | 46.0 |
| Yes | 74.7 | 54.0 |
| Region of residence | ||
| Northern | 18.2 | 18.0 |
| Central | 34.0 | 36.1 |
| Southern | 47.9 | 45.9 |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Tumbuka | 10.9 | 10.1 |
| Chewa | 29.4 | 29.1 |
| Lomwe | 16.3 | 17.9 |
| Tonga | 3.26 | 3.50 |
| Yao | 10.5 | 10.6 |
| Sena | 5.63 | 5.49 |
| Ngori | 13.6 | 12.8 |
| Others | 10.5 | 10.5 |
| Religion | ||
| Christian | 88.4 | 87.1 |
| Muslim | 11.0 | 10.3 |
| No religion | 0.59 | 2.68 |
| Urban-rural residence | ||
| Urban | 13.5 | 14.2 |
| Rural | 86.5 | 85.8 |
| Marital status | ||
| Never married | 19.6 | 37.7 |
| Currently married | 67.1 | 58.8 |
| Formerly married | 13.3 | 3.55 |
| Age of respondents (mean) | 28.1 | 29.1 |
| Educational background | ||
| No education | 14.6 | 6.02 |
| Primary education | 66.6 | 64.4 |
| Secondary/higher education | 18.9 | 29.6 |
| Wealth status | ||
| Poorest | 19.5 | 15.8 |
| Poorer | 19.5 | 20.2 |
| Middle | 20.5 | 20.5 |
| Richer | 20.5 | 21.5 |
| Richest | 20.0 | 22.0 |
| Currently working | ||
| No | 43.1 | 18.1 |
| Yes | 56.9 | 81.9 |
| Total | 22,489 | 6,978 |
Bivariate analysis of selected dependent and independent variables
| Women | Men | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | [CI 95 %] | OR | [CI 95 %] | |
| ABC prevention knowledge | 0.83*** | [0.78, 0.87] | 0.80*** | [0.78, 0.83] |
| Have been tested for AIDS | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 0.85*** | [0.80, 0.90] | 0.77*** | [0.70, 0.84] |
| Region of residence | ||||
| Northern | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Central | 0.67*** | [0.62, 0.72] | 0.69*** | [0.60, 0.79] |
| Southern | 0.51*** | [0.48, 0.54] | 0.57*** | [0.50, 0.65] |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Tumbuka | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Chewa | 1.41*** | [1.27, 1.55] | 1.26** | [1.07, 1.49] |
| Lomwe | 0.69*** | [0.64, 0.75] | 0.83* | [0.70, 0.97] |
| Tonga | 0.97 | [0.82, 1.15] | 0.99 | [0.73, 1.34] |
| Yao | 0.85** | [0.76, 0.95] | 1.11 | [0.96, 1.28] |
| Sena | 0.75*** | [0.65, 0.87] | 0.83 | [0.64, 1.08] |
| Ngori | 0.72*** | [0.66, 0.80] | 0.89 | [0.73, 1.08] |
| Others | 0.99 | [0.90, 1.10] | 1.07 | [0.88, 1.30] |
| Religion | ||||
| Christian | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Muslim | 1.12* | [1.02, 1.22] | 1.31*** | [1.14, 1.50] |
| No religion | 1.30 | [0.93, 1.81] | 1.28 | [0.99, 1.66] |
| Urban–rural residence | ||||
| Urban | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Rural | 2.18*** | [2.02, 2.36] | 2.10*** | [1.77, 2.48] |
| Marital status | ||||
| Never married | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Currently married | 1.37*** | [1.27, 1.47] | 1.17* | [1.04, 1.31] |
| Formerly married | 1.25*** | [1.13, 1.37] | 1.24 | [0.94, 1.64] |
| Age of respondents | 1.01*** | [1.01, 1.01] | 1.00 | [0.99, 1.01] |
| Educational background | ||||
| No education | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Primary education | 0.72*** | [0.66, 0.78] | 0.49*** | [0.41, 0.59] |
| Secondary/higher education | 0.25*** | [0.23, 0.28] | 0.17*** | [0.14, 0.21] |
| Wealth status | ||||
| Poorest | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Poorer | 0.89** | [0.83, 0.96] | 0.77*** | [0.67, 0.89] |
| Middle | 0.81*** | [0.75, 0.88] | 0.72*** | [0.63, 0.82] |
| Richer | 0.68*** | [0.63, 0.74] | 0.53*** | [0.46, 0.62] |
| Richest | 0.39*** | [0.36, 0.43] | 0.34*** | [0.29, 0.39] |
| Currently working | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 1.05 | [0.99, 1.11] | 1.07 | [0.99, 1.17] |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Odds ratios adjusted for clustering; 95% confidence intervals in brackets
Multivariate analysis of misconceptions about HIV transmission among women in Malawi
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | [95 % CI] | OR | [95 % CI] | OR | [95 % CI] | |
| ABC prevention knowledge | 0.81*** | [0.79, 0.83] | 0.83*** | [0.81, 0.86] | 0.85*** | [0.83, 0.87] |
| Have been tested for AIDS | ||||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 0.88*** | [0.83, 0.92] | 0.76*** | [0.71, 0.82] | 0.85*** | [0.79, 0.91] |
| Region of residence | ||||||
| Northern | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Central | 0.59*** | [0.51, 0.68] | 0.54*** | [0.47, 0.63] | ||
| Southern | 0.53*** | [0.47, 0.59] | 0.49*** | [0.43, 0.55] | ||
| Ethnicity | ||||||
| Tumbuka | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Chewa | 1.01 | [0.86, 1.18] | 0.83* | [0.70, 0.98] | ||
| Lomwe | 0.85 | [0.74, 0.99] | 0.75*** | [0.64, 0.88] | ||
| Tonga | 0.68*** | [0.58, 0.80] | 0.63*** | [0.54, 0.74] | ||
| Yao | 0.80* | [0.67, 0.96] | 0.69*** | [0.57, 0.83] | ||
| Sena | 0.88 | [0.72, 1.08] | 0.67*** | [0.54, 0.80] | ||
| Ngori | 0.83** | [0.72, 0.96] | 0.71*** | [0.61, 0.83] | ||
| Others | 0.86* | [0.76, 0.98] | 0.73*** | [0.64, 0.82] | ||
| Religion | ||||||
| Christian | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Muslim | 1.34*** | [1.18, 1.51] | 1.22*** | [1.08, 1.38] | ||
| No religion | 1.24 | [0.90, 1.72] | 1.04 | [0.76, 1.44] | ||
| Urban–rural residence | ||||||
| Urban | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Rural | 2.03*** | [1.86, 2.22] | 1.29*** | [1.16, 1.42] | ||
| Marital status | ||||||
| Never married | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Currently married | 1.40*** | [1.26, 1.55] | 1.12* | [1.01, 1.25] | ||
| Formerly married | 1.29*** | [1.13, 1.47] | 1.00 | [0.88, 1.13] | ||
| Age of respondents | 1.01*** | [1.00, 1.02] | 1.00 | [0.99, 1.00] | ||
| Educational background | ||||||
| No education | 1.00 | |||||
| Primary education | 0.70*** | [0.65, 0.77] | ||||
| Secondary/higher education | 0.30*** | [0.27, 0.33] | ||||
| Wealth status | ||||||
| Poorest | 1.00 | |||||
| Poorer | 0.89** | [0.82, 0.96] | ||||
| Middle | 0.83*** | [0.76, 0.91] | ||||
| Richer | 0.75*** | [0.68, 0.82] | ||||
| Richest | 0.61*** | [0.55, 0.67] | ||||
| Currently working | ||||||
| No | 1.00 | |||||
| Yes | 1.05 | [0.99, 1.12] | ||||
| Total | 22,489 | 22,489 | 22,489 | |||
| Log Pseudo-likelihood | −15,312 | −14,903 | −14,505 | |||
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Odds ratios adjusted for clustering; 95% confidence intervals in brackets
Multivariate analysis of misconceptions about HIV transmission among men in Malawi
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | [95 % CI] | OR | [95 % CI] | OR | [95 % CI] | |
| ABC prevention knowledge | 0.83*** | [0.79, 0.88] | 0.84*** | [0.79, 0.89] | 0.85*** | [0.80, 0.90] |
| Have been tested for AIDS | ||||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 0.78*** | [0.71, 0.86] | 0.74*** | [0.68, 0.82] | 0.88** | [0.80, 0.96] |
| Region of residence | ||||||
| Northern | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Central | 0.57*** | [0.46, 0.71] | 0.53*** | [0.43, 0.65] | ||
| Southern | 0.47*** | [0.37, 0.60] | 0.43*** | [0.35, 0.54] | ||
| Ethnicity | ||||||
| Tumbuka | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Chewa | 1.14 | [0.89, 1.47] | 0.94 | [0.73, 1.21] | ||
| Lomwe | 1.18 | [0.91, 1.54] | 1.06 | [0.81, 1.40] | ||
| Tonga | 0.80 | [0.61, 1.05] | 0.80 | [0.61, 1.05] | ||
| Yao | 1.18 | [0.84, 1.66] | 1.10 | [0.76, 1.57] | ||
| Sena | 1.20 | [0.82, 1.77] | 1.03 | [0.70, 1.52] | ||
| Ngori | 1.17 | [0.85, 1.62] | 1.07 | [0.77, 1.49] | ||
| Others | 1.08 | [0.87, 1.33] | 0.94 | [0.75, 1.17] | ||
| Religion | ||||||
| Christian | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Muslim | 1.49*** | [1.21, 1.84] | 1.22 | [0.98, 1.53] | ||
| No religion | 1.15 | [0.88, 1.52] | 0.91 | [0.69, 1.21] | ||
| Urban–rural residence | ||||||
| Urban | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Rural | 2.02*** | [1.70, 2.41] | 1.22* | [1.01, 1.48] | ||
| Marital status | ||||||
| Never married | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Currently married | 1.28** | [1.07, 1.52] | 1.14 | [0.95, 1.37] | ||
| Formerly married | 1.33 | [0.96, 1.83] | 1.06 | [0.77, 1.46] | ||
| Age of respondents | 1.00 | [0.99, 1.00] | 0.99 | [0.99, 1.00] | ||
| Educational background | ||||||
| No education | 1.00 | |||||
| Primary education | 0.51*** | [0.43, 0.61] | ||||
| Secondary/higher education | 0.21*** | [0.17, 0.26] | ||||
| Wealth status | ||||||
| Poorest | 1.00 | |||||
| Poorer | 0.84* | [0.74, 0.96] | ||||
| Middle | 0.79*** | [0.69, 0.90] | ||||
| Richer | 0.66*** | [0.56, 0.77] | ||||
| Richest | 0.58*** | [0.51, 0.67] | ||||
| Currently working | ||||||
| No | 1.00 | |||||
| Yes | 1.02 | [0.91, 1.15] | ||||
| Total | 6,978 | 6,978 | 6,978 | |||
| Log Pseudo-likelihood | −4,563 | −4,463 | −4,289 | |||
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Odds ratios adjusted for clustering; 95% confidence intervals in brackets