Literature DB >> 27267411

Lower Extremity Kinematic Profile of Gait of Patients After Ankle Fracture: A Case-Control Study.

Avi Elbaz1, Amit Mor2, Ganit Segal1, Dana Bar1, Maureen K Monda3, Benjamin Kish4, Meir Nyska4, Ezequiel Palmanovich4.   

Abstract

The present study examined the differences in the lower extremity gait kinematic profile of patients recovering from ankle fracture compared with healthy controls. In addition, we inquired whether the profile would differ among fracture severity groups. A total of 48 patients participated in the present prospective, case-control study. The gait of 24 patients recovering from an ankle fracture injury and 24 healthy matched controls was examined using an inertial measurement unit sensor system. The following gait parameters were evaluated: knee range of motion (ROM) during the swing phase, maximum knee flexion angle during stance, thigh and calf ROM, and stride duration. Statistically significant differences were found between the ankle fracture group and the control group for all parameters. The patients with ankle fracture had a lower knee ROM during swing phase compared with the control group (mean ± standard deviation 43.0° ± 15.5° compared with 66.7° ± 5.1°, respectively; p < .001). The maximum knee flexion angle during stance was lower in the patients with ankle fracture than in the control group (mean ± standard deviation 10.5° ± 6.1° compared with 21.2° ± 4.5°, respectively; p < .001). Patients with ankle fracture also had lower gait cycle thigh and calf ROM angles (p < .001) and a longer stride duration (p < .001) compared with the control group. No statistically significant differences were found among the severity groups. These results suggest that the gait kinematic characteristics vary between healthy people and patients recovering from an ankle fracture injury during the short-term period after injury.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gait analysis; kinematics; range of motion; tibia; trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27267411     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  5 in total

Review 1.  Use of Wearable Technology to Measure Activity in Orthopaedic Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Meir T Marmor; Bernd Grimm; Andrew M Hanflik; Peter H Richter; Sureshan Sivananthan; Seth Robert Yarboro; Benedikt J Braun
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 1.033

2.  Validity and repeatability of inertial measurement units for measuring gait parameters.

Authors:  Edward P Washabaugh; Tarun Kalyanaraman; Peter G Adamczyk; Edward S Claflin; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Comparison of Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters Following Operative Treatment of Trimalleolar Ankle Fractures vs Healthy Controls.

Authors:  Andrew F Tyler; Thomas Rose; Scott Day; Jessica Kenia; Annamarie D Horan; Samir Mehta; Derek J Donegan
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2020-07-30

4.  Clinical-Functional Evaluation and Test-Retest Reliability of the G-WALK Sensor in Subjects with Bimalleolar Ankle Fractures 6 Months after Surgery.

Authors:  Mario Fernández-Gorgojo; Diana Salas-Gómez; Pascual Sánchez-Juan; David Barbado; Esther Laguna-Bercero; María Isabel Pérez-Núñez
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 5.  Gait Alterations in Adults after Ankle Fracture: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marta Mirando; Corrado Conti; Federica Zeni; Fabio Pedicini; Antonio Nardone; Chiara Pavese
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.