Literature DB >> 27267349

Comparative Evaluation of Bioactive Glass (Putty) and Platelet Rich Fibrin in Treating Furcation Defects.

Shriparna Biswas1, Savita Sambashivaiah1, Rithesh Kulal1, Shivaprasad Bilichodmath1, Gregori M Kurtzman2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare a second-generation bioactive glass putty biomaterial against platelet rich fibrin in treating grade II furcation defects. Subjects were 15 systemically healthy patients (10 males and 5 females, ages 20-50 with a mean age of 38.33) with 20 mandibular molar class II furcation defects according to Glickman's classification. The 20 mandibular molar furcation defects were randomly allocated as follows: Group I, 10 furcation defects were treated using bioactive glass (NovaBone) bone graft putty material; Group II, 10 furcation defects were treated using platelet rich fibrin (PRF). Customized acrylic stents were fabricated on study casts and trimmed to the height contour of the teeth to serve as a fixed reference point for measurements. The following measurements were collected: gingival index, plaque index, vertical probing depth (from gingival margin to base of the pocket), clinical attachment level (CEJ to the base of the pocket), and horizontal probing depth of furcation involvement (using stent). Results showed that both groups had improvement in gingival index (GI) and plaque index (PI) at the recall intervals. There was an overall reduction in both vertical and horizontal probing depth in both groups; however, the Putty group (Group I) showed consistently more vertical probing depth reduction than the PRF group (Group II) at the end of third month (P-value = 0.0004), sixth month (P-value = 0.00001), and ninth month (P-value = 0.0004). Our conclusion was that use of bioactive glass osteostimulative biomaterial yields superior clinical results, including increased pocket depth reduction of class II furcation defects as compared to an autologous platelet concentrate. The clinical significance of our findings include the ease of use and superior biologic performance of second-generation putty bioglass biomaterials in furcation defects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioactive glass; periodontal regeneration; periodontitis; putty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27267349     DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  5 in total

1.  Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Applying Atorvastatin 1.2% Bio Adhesive with Plasma Rich in Growth Factor (PRGF) for Treatment of Mandibular Class II Furcation Defects: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Niloofar Jenabian; Sakine Mohammadpour; Sina Haghanifar; Sohrab Kazemi; Mahmood Hajiahmady
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2022-06

Review 2.  [Application and research status of bioactive glass in bone repair].

Authors:  Yonghua Huang; Li Li; Zhanying Shi; Xu Cui; Haobo Pan; Bing Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-05-15

Review 3.  The clinical implications of platelet-rich fibrin on periodontal regeneration: A systematic review.

Authors:  Marwa Madi; Ahmed M Elakel
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2020-12-09

Review 4.  The recent advances in scaffolds for integrated periodontal regeneration.

Authors:  Hyun Nyun Woo; Young Joon Cho; Solaiman Tarafder; Chang H Lee
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-03-18

Review 5.  Bioactive Glasses in Periodontal Regeneration: Existing Strategies and Future Prospects-A Literature Review.

Authors:  Valeria Cannillo; Roberta Salvatori; Stefania Bergamini; Devis Bellucci; Carlo Bertoldi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.