Literature DB >> 27267250

Estimating the prevalence of female genital mutilation in Portugal.

A L Teixeira1, M Lisboa2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Due to globalized migratory processes, female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) has spread to other countries, including countries in Europe, where, with a few exceptions, it remains a concealed problem. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first national extensive study to estimate the prevalence of FGM/C in Portugal. STUDY
DESIGN: Prevalence estimation.
METHODS: Using extrapolation of country-of-origin prevalence data and the 2011 Census data, this study estimated: the prevalence of FGM/C in Portugal among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) and among all women aged ≥15 years; and the number of girls aged <15 years living in Portugal who have undergone or will probably undergo FGM/C.
RESULTS: It is estimated that 6576 women aged ≥15 years living in Portugal have undergone FGM/C, with cases distributed unevenly throughout the national territory. In addition, it is estimated that 1830 girls aged <15 years living in Portugal have undergone or are likely to undergo FGM/C.
CONCLUSIONS: This study estimated that more than 6000 women living in Portugal have undergone FGM/C, and many girls remain at risk. These two groups need different types of interventions. Awareness of the number and geographical dispersion of cases of FGM/C will enable more informed and targeted definition of public health policies for protection of females who have undergone or are at risk of undergoing FGM/C.
Copyright © 2016 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Female genital cutting; Female genital mutilation; Portugal; Prevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27267250     DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  7 in total

1.  Health care-seeking patterns for female genital mutilation/cutting among young Somalis in Norway.

Authors:  Vivian N Mbanya; Abdi A Gele; Esperanza Diaz; Bernadette Kumar
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Reducing Sexual and Reproductive Health Inequities Between Natives and Migrants: A Delphi Consensus for Sustainable Cross-Cultural Healthcare Pathways.

Authors:  Pedro Candeias; Violeta Alarcão; Miodraga Stefanovska-Petkovska; Osvaldo Santos; Ana Virgolino; Sónia Pintassilgo; Patrícia M Pascoal; Andreia Silva Costa; Fernando Luís Machado
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13

Review 3.  Female genital mutilation/cutting in Africa.

Authors:  Akin-Tunde A Odukogbe; Bosede B Afolabi; Oluwasomidoyin O Bello; Ayodeji S Adeyanju
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-04

4.  Mapping the lack of public initiative against female genital mutilation in Denmark.

Authors:  Gro Møller Christoffersen; Peter James Bruhn; Rosanna de Neergaard; Susanne Engel; Vibeke Naeser
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  A cross-sectional study of traditional practices affecting maternal and newborn health in rural Nigeria.

Authors:  Adenike Oluwayemisi Jimoh; Sunday Enema Adaji; Hamdalla Adelaiye; Abiola Aira Olorukooba; Umma Bawa; Habiba Ismail Ibrahim; Comfort Garba; Anita Lukong Mfuh; Suleiman Idris; Sunday Oladapo Shittu
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2018-09-28

6.  Knowledge, attitude, practice, and predictors of female genital mutilation in Degadamot district, Amhara regional state, Northwest Ethiopia, 2018.

Authors:  Gedif Melese; Mulugeta Tesfa; Yewbmirt Sharew; Tsegaye Mehare
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  The socioeconomic dynamics of trends in female genital mutilation/cutting across Africa.

Authors:  Ewa Batyra; Ernestina Coast; Ben Wilson; Valeria Cetorelli
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.