Literature DB >> 27267227

Comparative Analysis of Radiographic Hip Joint Geometry Using Measurement Tools on Picture Archiving and Communication System: A Prospective Study of 100 Pelvic Radiographs of Koreans.

Seung-Chan Kim1, Young-Wook Lim1, Soon-Yong Kwon2, Jun-Ku Lee1, Il-Kyu Park1, Yong-Sik Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A contralateral normal hip joint has been often used as a reference standard in preoperative planning and intraoperative assessment of hip arthroplasty, with the assumption that bilateral hip joint geometries have no significant differences. However, one previous study using analog measurements on hardcopy films reported significant bilateral variation in hip joint geometry. We therefore investigated the level of agreement between the right and left hips for each measurement and determined index values and the range of normal bilateral variations.
METHODS: We assessed 100 standard anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis in this study. Two independent observers measured the actual value of femoral head diameter, location of the femoral head center, acetabular offset, femoral offset, hip offset, greater trochanteric height, neck-shaft angle, medullary canal diameter, and proximal femoral diameter. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and values of mean difference were calculated for each measurement.
RESULTS: The results demonstrated perfect agreement (ICC >0.8) between the right and left hips for most parameters and substantial agreement for greater trochanteric height (ICC = 0.735) and femoral offset (ICC = 0.773). The mean difference and standard deviation in the measurement between the right and left hips for the location of the femoral head center and the acetabular offset were 0.60 ± 0.48 mm and 0.42 ± 0.30 mm, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Hip joint geometry is not influenced by side. In hip arthroplasty, a contralateral normal hip can be reliably used as a guide for preoperative planning using measurement tools on a picture archiving and communication system.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bilateral variation; geometry; hip arthroplasty; hip joint geometry; picture archiving and communication system

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27267227     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  2 in total

1.  How Accurate is the Use of Contralateral Implant Size as a Template in Bilateral Hemiarthroplasty?

Authors:  Raghavendra Marappa-Ganeshan; Francis Sim; Sameh Sidhom; Gautam Chakrabarty; Hemant G Pandit; Bernard H van Duren
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 1.251

2.  Level of surgical experience is associated with change in hip center of rotation following cementless total hip arthroplasty: A radiographic assessment.

Authors:  Seung-Chan Kim; Young-Wook Lim; Soon-Yong Kwon; Woo-Lam Jo; Sung-Hun Ju; Chan-Joo Park; Choong-Woo Lee; Yong-Sik Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.