Literature DB >> 27267047

Discrepancies between selected Pareto optimal plans and final deliverable plans in radiotherapy multi-criteria optimization.

Archonteia Kyroudi1, Kristoffer Petersson1, Sarah Ghandour2, Marc Pachoud2, Oscar Matzinger2, Mahmut Ozsahin3, Jean Bourhis3, François Bochud1, Raphaël Moeckli1.   

Abstract

Multi-criteria optimization provides decision makers with a range of clinical choices through Pareto plans that can be explored during real time navigation and then converted into deliverable plans. Our study shows that dosimetric differences can arise between the two steps, which could compromise the clinical choices made during navigation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Deliverable; Multi-criteria optimization; Navigated; Pareto fronts

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27267047     DOI： 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN： 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  7 in total

Review 1.  Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Ben J M Heijmen; Dirk Verellen; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Effectiveness of Multi-Criteria Optimization-based Trade-Off exploration in combination with RapidPlan for head & neck radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Eliane Miguel-Chumacero; Garry Currie; Abigail Johnston; Suzanne Currie
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Real-time interactive planning for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Lindsey Baker; Robert Olson; Taran Braich; Theodora Koulis; Allison Ye; Nisar Ahmed; Eric Tran; Kim Lawyer; Karl Otto; Sally Smith; Ante Mestrovic; Quinn Matthews
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-04-04

4.  Utilisation of Pareto navigation techniques to calibrate a fully automated radiotherapy treatment planning solution.

Authors:  Philip A Wheeler; Michael Chu; Rosemary Holmes; Maeve Smyth; Rhydian Maggs; Emiliano Spezi; John Staffurth; David G Lewis; Anthony E Millin
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-05-16

5.  A treatment planning comparison of contemporary photon-based radiation techniques for breast cancer.

Authors:  Michele Zeverino; Kristoffer Petersson; Archonteia Kyroudi; Wendy Jeanneret-Sozzi; Jean Bourhis; Francois Bochud; Raphael Moeckli
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-08

6.  Exploration of clinical preferences in treatment planning of radiotherapy for prostate cancer using Pareto fronts and clinical grading analysis.

Authors:  A Kyroudi; K Petersson; E Ozsahin; J Bourhis; F Bochud; R Moeckli
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-06-12

7.  Multicriteria plan optimization in the hands of physicians: a pilot study in prostate cancer and brain tumors.

Authors:  Birgit S Müller; Helen A Shih; Jason A Efstathiou; Thomas Bortfeld; David Craft
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.481
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.