Literature DB >> 27266863

Faecal calprotectin in patients with suspected colorectal cancer: a diagnostic accuracy study.

James Turvill1, Assad Aghahoseini2, Nala Sivarajasingham2, Kazim Abbas2, Murtaza Choudhry2, Kostantinos Polyzois2, Kostantinos Lasithiotakis2, Dimitra Volanaki2, Baek Kim2, Fiona Langlands2, Helen Andrew2, Jesper Roos2, Samantha Mellen3, Daniel Turnock3, Alison Jones3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: NICE guidance exists for the use of faecal calprotectin (FC) when irritable bowel syndrome or inflammatory bowel disease are suspected. Often, however, colorectal cancer is considered within the differential. Should FC have a high diagnostic accuracy for colorectal cancer, it may be applicable as a primary care screening test for all patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms. AIM: To determine the negative and positive predictive value (NPV/PPV) of FC in patients referred from primary care with suspected colorectal cancer. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A diagnostic accuracy study conducted at a single secondary care site
METHOD: Consenting patients referred with suspected colorectal cancer within the '2-week wait' pathway provided a stool sample for FC prior to investigation. FC levels were reconciled with end diagnoses: cancer, adenomatous polyps ≥10 mm, and all enteric organic disease.
RESULTS: A total of 654 patients completed the evaluation; median age 69 years, female 56%. The NPV for colorectal cancer was 98.6% and 97.2% when including polyps ≥10 mm. The PPV for all organic enteric disease was 32.7%. The diagnostic yield for cancer based on clinical suspicion was 6.3%. By altering the FC cut-off to fix the NPV at 97.0%, the PPV for cancer increased from 8.7% to 13.3%.
CONCLUSION: FC has a high NPV for colorectal cancer and significant polyps in patients with suspected cancer. In total, 27.8% of patients had a normal FC and could safely have been spared a '2-week wait' referral. The addition of FC testing into the current symptom-based assessment has the potential to increase colorectal cancer detection rate yet be clinically and cost effective. © British Journal of General Practice 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calprotectin; colorectal cancer; diagnostic accuracy; primary care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27266863      PMCID: PMC4917053          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X685645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  19 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care fecal calprotectin and immunochemical occult blood tests for diagnosis of organic bowel disease in primary care: the Cost-Effectiveness of a Decision Rule for Abdominal Complaints in Primary Care (CEDAR) study.

Authors:  Liselotte Kok; Sjoerd G Elias; Ben J M Witteman; Jelle G Goedhard; Jean W M Muris; Karel G M Moons; Niek J de Wit
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Evaluation of a faecal calprotectin care pathway for use in primary care.

Authors:  James Turvill; Shaun O'Connell; Abigail Brooks; Karen Bradley-Wood; James Laing; Swaminathan Thiagarajan; David Hammond; Daniel Turnock; Alison Jones; Ruchit Sood; Alex Ford
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 1.458

3.  Diagnostic precision of fecal calprotectin for inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal malignancy.

Authors:  Alexander C von Roon; Leonidas Karamountzos; Sanjay Purkayastha; George E Reese; Ara W Darzi; Julian P Teare; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  Diagnostic utility of alarm features for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A C Ford; S J O Veldhuyzen van Zanten; C C Rodgers; N J Talley; N B Vakil; P Moayyedi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Use of surrogate markers of inflammation and Rome criteria to distinguish organic from nonorganic intestinal disease.

Authors:  Jeremy A Tibble; Gudmundur Sigthorsson; Russell Foster; Ian Forgacs; Ingvar Bjarnason
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Combining risk factors with faecal immunochemical test outcome for selecting CRC screenees for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Inge Stegeman; Thomas R de Wijkerslooth; Esther M Stoop; Monique E van Leerdam; Evelien Dekker; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ernst J Kuipers; Paul Fockens; Roderik A Kraaijenhagen; Patrick M Bossuyt
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas.

Authors:  W S Atkin; B C Morson; J Cuzick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Faecal calprotectin for screening of patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease: diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick F van Rheenen; Els Van de Vijver; Vaclav Fidler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-07-15

9.  A predictive model combining fecal calgranulin B and fecal occult blood tests can improve the diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Byung Chang Kim; Jungnam Joo; Hee Jin Chang; Hyun Yang Yeo; Byong Chul Yoo; Boram Park; Ji Won Park; Dae Kyung Sohn; Chang Won Hong; Kyung Su Han
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Faecal haemoglobin and faecal calprotectin as indicators of bowel disease in patients presenting to primary care with bowel symptoms.

Authors:  Craig Mowat; Jayne Digby; Judith A Strachan; Robyn Wilson; Francis A Carey; Callum G Fraser; Robert J C Steele
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  14 in total

1.  Rectal bleeding in general practice: new guidance on commissioning.

Authors:  Ciaran J Walsh; Simon Delaney; Andrew Rowlands
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults.

Authors:  Christopher Andrew Lamb; Nicholas A Kennedy; Tim Raine; Philip Anthony Hendy; Philip J Smith; Jimmy K Limdi; Bu'Hussain Hayee; Miranda C E Lomer; Gareth C Parkes; Christian Selinger; Kevin J Barrett; R Justin Davies; Cathy Bennett; Stuart Gittens; Malcolm G Dunlop; Omar Faiz; Aileen Fraser; Vikki Garrick; Paul D Johnston; Miles Parkes; Jeremy Sanderson; Helen Terry; Daniel R Gaya; Tariq H Iqbal; Stuart A Taylor; Melissa Smith; Matthew Brookes; Richard Hansen; A Barney Hawthorne
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Getting the best out of faecal immunochemical tests and faecal calprotectin.

Authors:  Charlotte Chuter; Ada Keding; Hayden Holmes; Daniel Turnock; James Turvill
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12-24

4.  Calcium Binding to the Innate Immune Protein Human Calprotectin Revealed by Integrated Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jagat Adhikari; Jules R Stephan; Don L Rempel; Elizabeth M Nolan; Michael L Gross
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Clinical features of bowel disease in patients aged <50 years in primary care: a large case-control study.

Authors:  Sally A Stapley; Greg P Rubin; Deborah Alsina; Elizabeth A Shephard; Matthew D Rutter; William T Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  The combination of quantitative faecal occult blood test and faecal calprotectin is a cost-effective strategy to avoid colonoscopies in symptomatic patients without relevant pathology.

Authors:  Alberto Lué; Gonzalo Hijos; Carlos Sostres; Alba Perales; Mercedes Navarro; Maria Victoria Barra; Barbara Mascialino; Carmen Andalucia; Juan José Puente; Ángel Lanas; Fernando Gomollon
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.409

7.  Tissue mRNA for S100A4, S100A6, S100A8, S100A9, S100A11 and S100P Proteins in Colorectal Neoplasia: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Eva Peterova; Jan Bures; Paula Moravkova; Darina Kohoutova
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin in predicting significant gastrointestinal diseases.

Authors:  Yee Man Kan; Sin Yan Chu; Ching Kong Loo
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2021-05-06

9.  The Fast Track FIT study: diagnostic accuracy of faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin in patients with suspected colorectal cancer.

Authors:  James L Turvill; Daniel Turnock; Dan Cottingham; Monica Haritakis; Laura Jeffery; Annabelle Girdwood; Tom Hearfield; Alex Mitchell; Ada Keding
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 6.302

10.  The Addition of Other Fecal Biomarkers Does Not Improve the Diagnostic Accuracy of Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Test Alone in a Colorrectal Cancer Screening Cohort.

Authors:  Gonzalo Hijos-Mallada; Alberto Lué; Raul Velamazan; Nuria Saura; Carlos Abril; Marta Lorenzo; Mercedes Navarro; Eduardo Chueca; Samantha Arechavaleta; Fernando Gomollón; Ángel Lanas; Carlos Sostres
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.