Literature DB >> 27265738

Trade-offs among ecosystem services in a typical Karst watershed, SW China.

Yichao Tian1, Shijie Wang2, Xiaoyong Bai3, Guangjie Luo2, Yan Xu2.   

Abstract

Nowadays, most research results on ecosystem services in Karst areas are limited to a single function of an ecosystem service. Few scholars conduct a comparative study on the mutual relationships among ecosystem services, let alone reveal the trade-off and synergic relationships in typical Karst watershed. This research aims to understand and quantitatively evaluate the relationships among ecosystem services in a typical Karst watershed, broaden the depth and width of trade-off and synergic relationships in ecosystem services and explore a set of technical processes involved in these relationships. With the Shibantang Karst watershed in China as the research site, we explore the trade-off and synergic relationships of net primary productivity (NPP), water yield, and sediment yield by coupling Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach (CASA), and simulating and evaluating these three ecosystem services between 2000 and 2010. Results of this study are as follows. (1) The annual average water yield decreased from 528mm in 2000 to 513mm in 2010, decreasing by 2.84%. (2) The annual average sediment yield decreased from 26.15t/ha in 2000 to 23.81t/ha in 2010, with an average annual reduction of 0.23t/ha. (3) The annual average NPP increased from 739.38gCm(-2)a(-1) in 2000 to 746.25gCm(-2)a(-1) in 2010, increasing by 6.87gCm(-2)a(-1) . (4) Water yield and sediment yield are in a synergic relationship. The increase of water yield can accumulate the soil erosion amount. NPP is in a trade-off relationship with water yield and sediment yield. The improvement of NPP is good for decreasing water yield and soil erosion amount and increasing soil conservation amount. This study provides policy makers and planners an approach to develop an integrated model, as well as design mapping and monitoring protocols for land use change and ecosystem service assessments.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CASA; Hydrological process; Land use; SWAT; Soil erosion; Trade-offs

Year:  2016        PMID: 27265738     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Runoff response to climate change and human activities in a typical karst watershed, SW China.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Shijie Wang; Xiaoyong Bai; Dongcai Shu; Yichao Tian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Gray Forecast of Ecosystem Services Value and Its Driving Forces in Karst Areas of China: A Case Study in Guizhou Province, China.

Authors:  Sipei Pan; Jiale Liang; Wanxu Chen; Jiangfeng Li; Ziqi Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Do Ecological Restoration Projects Improve Water-Related Ecosystem Services? Evidence from a Study in the Hengduan Mountain Region.

Authors:  Le Yin; Shumin Zhang; Baolei Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Relationship among land surface temperature and LUCC, NDVI in typical karst area.

Authors:  Yuanhong Deng; Shijie Wang; Xiaoyong Bai; Yichao Tian; Luhua Wu; Jianyong Xiao; Fei Chen; Qinghuan Qian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China.

Authors:  Liang-Jie Wang; Shuai Ma; Yong-Peng Qiao; Jin-Chi Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.