Literature DB >> 27265375

Assessing the mutagenic activities of smoke from different cigarettes in direct exposure experiments using the modified Ames Salmonella assay.

Shinkichi Ishikawa1, Yuki Kanemaru2, Hidenori Nara2, Kazuo Erami2, Yasufumi Nagata2.   

Abstract

The Ames assay is useful for evaluating the mutagenic potentials of chemicals, and it has been used to evaluate the mutagenic potential of cigarette smoke (CS). In vitro direct exposure systems have been developed to mimic CS exposure in the human respiratory tract, and the Ames assay has been used with such systems. Ames tests were performed using the Vitrocell(®) direct exposure system in this study. The mutagenic potentials of whole mainstream CS and gas/vapor phase fractions produced by conventional combustible cigarettes under two smoking regimens were compared. Salmonella Typhimurium TA98 and TA100 were used with and without metabolic activation, and the number of revertants induced by exposure to each CS was determined. The amount of smoke particles to which cells were exposed were also determined, and dose-response curves describing the relationships between exposure to smoke particles and the number of revertants induced were plotted. The slopes of linear regressions of the dose-response curves were determined, and the slope for each CS was used as a mutagenic activity index for that CS. A new heated cigarette was also tested and smoke from the heated cigarette had a lower mutagenic activity in TA98 and TA100 with metabolic activation than did the conventional CS. The results indicate that the direct exposure system and the Ames test can be used to determine the mutagenic potentials of CS produced by different cigarettes under different conditions (i.e., using different Salmonella Typhimurium strains with and without metabolic activation, and using different smoking conditions).
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ames test; Direct exposure; Heated cigarette; Solanesol; Vitrocell(®)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27265375     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen        ISSN: 1383-5718            Impact factor:   2.873


  3 in total

1.  Comparative potency analysis of whole smoke solutions in the bacterial reverse mutation test.

Authors:  Fanxue Meng; Nan Mei; Jian Yan; Xiaoqing Guo; Patricia A Richter; Tao Chen; Mamata De
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Development, qualification, validation and application of the Ames test using a VITROCELL® VC10® smoke exposure system.

Authors:  Kathy Fowler; Wanda Fields; Victoria Hargreaves; Lesley Reeve; Betsy Bombick
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2018-04-12

Review 3.  Solanesol Biosynthesis in Plants.

Authors:  Ning Yan; Yanhua Liu; Hongbo Zhang; Yongmei Du; Xinmin Liu; Zhongfeng Zhang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.