Valerie Speirs1, Bethny Morrisey1, Ingunn Holen2, Karen Blyth3, Phil Carter4, Claude Chelala4, Louise Jones4. 1. Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. 2. Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. 3. Cancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, UK. 4. Barts Cancer Institute, London, UK.
Sir,We applaud the recent Journal of Pathology Annual Review Issue on Models of Human Disease. This highlighted the need to identify robust and relevant models to address human disease, recognising their strengths and limitations 1, at the same time being cognisant of employing the principles of the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement) 2 in research, and improving experimental reproducibility by adequately reporting on pathology data gathered from animal tissues, by introducing the MINPEPA guidelines (minimum information for publication of experimental pathology data 3.As a corollary to these excellent articles contained within the Annual Review 1, 3 we would like to draw attention to a new resource we have developed which is designed to facilitate sharing of archival animal material in breast cancer, also encouraging scientists to consider alternative models by developing 3D in vitro models using human clinical material. Called SEARCHBreast (Sharing Experimental Animal Resources: Coordinating Holdings – Breast), this is a virtual online resource. SEARCHBreast allows researchers who may have surplus animal materials which they may be willing to share collaboratively to upload these to the SEARCHBreast website (https://searchbreast.org). Researchers wishing to obtain such models can register, allowing access to well‐characterised materials which have been previously generated from animal studies (e.g. transgenic, xenograft, patient‐derived xenograft (PDX)) thereby reducing or even eliminating the need to initiate new in vivo experiments 4, 5.As well as making previously hidden archival animal materials more widely available, SEARCHBreast also provides information to improve the use of animals in research e.g. links to online technical information or standard operating procedures which give guidelines on experimental procedures in animals. SEARCHBreast is also developing a bioinformatics pipeline, designed to take advantage of the large amount of data being generated through various ‘omics’ technologies. This aims to allow researchers to select models that are the most relevant to address their biological question. Additionally, SEARCHBreast encourages scientists to consider alternative humanised in vitro models of breast cancer 6, through engagement with the Breast Cancer Now Tissue Bank cell culture programme 7.We encourage your readers to explore this resource; following a simple on line registration process, academic researchers have free access to SEARCHBreast at https://searchbreast.org.
Author Contributions
KB, CC, LJ, IH, VS conceived of the study, secured funding and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. BM participated in the design of the study, management of the resource and prepared the first draft; PC participated in the design of the study and constructed the database and website. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors: Cheryl L Scudamore; Elizabeth J Soilleux; Natasha A Karp; Ken Smith; Richard Poulsom; C Simon Herrington; Michael J Day; Cory F Brayton; Brad Bolon; Bruce Whitelaw; Eric S White; Jeffrey I Everitt; Mark J Arends Journal: J Pathol Date: 2015-11-28 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Karen Blyth; Phil Carter; Bethny Morrissey; Claude Chelala; Louise Jones; Ingunn Holen; Valerie Speirs Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 4.872