Steve R Fisher1, James E Graham2, Kenneth J Ottenbacher2, Rachel Deer3, Glenn V Ostir4. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX. Electronic address: stfisher@utmb.edu. 2. Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Health Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX. 3. Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX. 4. Division of Gerontology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the 30-day readmission predictive power of in-hospital walking activity and in-hospital activities of daily living (ADLs) in older acutely ill patients. In addition, we sought to identify preliminary walking thresholds that could support the targeting of interventions aimed at minimizing rehospitalizations. DESIGN: Prospective, observational clinical cohort study. Step counts during hospitalization were assessed via accelerometry. ADL function was assessed within 48 hours of admission. SETTING: Acute care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-four ambulatory persons aged 65 years and older admitted to the hospital from the community with an acute medical illness. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Readmission back to the index hospital (yes vs no) within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (15.8%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Walking activity during hospitalization was more strongly and significantly associated with 30-day readmission (odds ratio=0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.98) than ADL function (odds ratio=0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-1.45) after adjusting for relevant readmission risk factors. The predictive accuracy (area under the curve) was highest for models that included walking activity and changed little with the addition of ADLs. A walking threshold of 275 steps or more per day identified patients at reduced 30-day readmission risk. CONCLUSIONS: Walking activity was a stronger predictor of readmission than ADLs. Monitoring patient activity during hospitalization may provide clinicians with valuable information on early readmission risk not captured by measures of ADLs. Further study is needed to replicate these findings and monitor walking activity posthospitalization to further advance our understanding of readmission risk.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the 30-day readmission predictive power of in-hospital walking activity and in-hospital activities of daily living (ADLs) in older acutely ill patients. In addition, we sought to identify preliminary walking thresholds that could support the targeting of interventions aimed at minimizing rehospitalizations. DESIGN: Prospective, observational clinical cohort study. Step counts during hospitalization were assessed via accelerometry. ADL function was assessed within 48 hours of admission. SETTING: Acute care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-four ambulatory persons aged 65 years and older admitted to the hospital from the community with an acute medical illness. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Readmission back to the index hospital (yes vs no) within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (15.8%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. Walking activity during hospitalization was more strongly and significantly associated with 30-day readmission (odds ratio=0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.98) than ADL function (odds ratio=0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-1.45) after adjusting for relevant readmission risk factors. The predictive accuracy (area under the curve) was highest for models that included walking activity and changed little with the addition of ADLs. A walking threshold of 275 steps or more per day identified patients at reduced 30-day readmission risk. CONCLUSIONS: Walking activity was a stronger predictor of readmission than ADLs. Monitoring patient activity during hospitalization may provide clinicians with valuable information on early readmission risk not captured by measures of ADLs. Further study is needed to replicate these findings and monitor walking activity posthospitalization to further advance our understanding of readmission risk.
Authors: Glenn V Ostir; Ivonne Berges; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Jack M Guralnik Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-02-27
Authors: Steve R Fisher; Yong-Fang Kuo; Gulshan Sharma; Mukaila A Raji; Amit Kumar; James S Goodwin; Glenn V Ostir; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kathryn E Callahan; Laura Lovato; Michael E Miller; Anthony P Marsh; Roger A Fielding; Thomas M Gill; Erik J Groessl; Jack Guralnik; Abby C King; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Mary M McDermott; Todd Manini; Anne B Newman; W Jack Rejeski Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Elizabeth Sapey; Mona Bafadhel; Charlotte Emma Bolton; Thomas Wilkinson; John R Hurst; Jennifer K Quint Journal: Thorax Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Niek Koenders; Joost P H Seeger; Teun van der Giessen; Ties J van den Hurk; Indy G M Smits; Anne M Tankink; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Thomas J Hoogeboom Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 3.240