Literature DB >> 2726409

Distance perception as a function of photographic area of view.

R N Kraft, J S Green.   

Abstract

Distance perception of depicted objects was examined as a function of photographic area of view. Subjects viewed slides of natural outdoor scenes and directly estimated the distances to specified objects. Area of view was manipulated by means of photographing each scene with lenses of five different focal lengths: 135, 80, 48, 28, and 17 mm. Distance perception along the pictorial depth plane was systematically transformed through changing the photographic area of view: the shorter the focal length of the camera lens, the wider the area of view, and the greater the perceived distance. Linear functions for each subject's distance judgments revealed a very high goodness of fit. Both the y-intercepts and the slopes increased as focal length decreased. The increasing y-intercepts suggest that viewers place themselves farther away from the depicted scene as focal length decreases, compensating for the advancing proximal edge. The increasing slopes suggest that distance information throughout the pictorial depth plane appears to change with focal length. The subjects also made direct judgments of foreground truncation, revealing that foreground truncation decreased as focal length decreased, but that this decrease did not account for the considerable expansion in distance perception.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2726409     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  9 in total

1.  Flight simulation.

Authors:  R N Haber
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.142

Review 2.  Picture perception: toward a theoretical model.

Authors:  M A Hagen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Range effects in psychophysical scaling and a revision of Stevens' law.

Authors:  R Teghtsoonian
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1973-03

4.  On the exponents in Stevens' law and the constant in Ekman's law.

Authors:  R Teghtsoonian
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Distance perception in photographic displays of natural settings.

Authors:  R N Kraft; J F Patterson; N B Mitchell
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1986-02

6.  Scales for perceived egocentric distance in a large open field: comparison of three psychophysical methods.

Authors:  J A Da Silva
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1985

7.  Perception of radial distance as a function of magnification and truncation of depicted spatial layout.

Authors:  E A Lumsden
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

8.  The effects of binocular and motion-generated information on the perception of depth and height.

Authors:  M A Hagen; M Teghtsoonian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-09

9.  On a neglected variable in theories of pictorial perception: truncation of the visual field.

Authors:  M A Hagen; R K Jones; E S Reed
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-04
  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Compensation is unnecessary for the perception of faces in slanted pictures.

Authors:  T A Busey; N P Brady; J E Cutting
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-07

2.  The perceptual basis of common photographic practice.

Authors:  Emily A Cooper; Elise A Piazza; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Camera Focal Length and the Perception of Pictures.

Authors:  Martin S Banks; Emily A Cooper; Elise A Piazza
Journal:  Ecol Psychol       Date:  2014-01-01

4.  Multiple Photographs of a Perspective Scene Reveal the Principles of Picture Perception.

Authors:  Casper J Erkelens
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-26

5.  Environment width robustly influences egocentric distance judgments.

Authors:  Lindsay A Houck; Dwight J Kravitz; John W Philbeck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.