Literature DB >> 27264006

Prognostic impact of bone marrow fibrosis in primary myelofibrosis. A study of the AGIMM group on 490 patients.

Paola Guglielmelli1, Giada Rotunno1, Annalisa Pacilli1, Elisa Rumi2,3, Vittorio Rosti4, Federica Delaini5, Margherita Maffioli6, Tiziana Fanelli1,7, Alessandro Pancrazzi1, Lisa Pieri1, Rajmonda Fjerza1, Daniela Pietra2, Daniela Cilloni8, Emanuela Sant'Antonio1, Silvia Salmoiraghi5, Francesco Passamonti6, Alessandro Rambaldi5, Giovanni Barosi4, Tiziano Barbui9, Mario Cazzola2,3, Alessandro M Vannucchi1.   

Abstract

The prognostic significance of bone marrow (BM) fibrosis grade in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is still debated. A fibrosis grade greater than 1 was shown to associate with higher risk of death, and addition of fibrosis grade to IPSS score resulted in a more accurate prediction of survival. The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic impact of BM fibrosis in 490 patients with PMF, evaluated at diagnosis, molecularly annotated and with extensive follow-up information. We found that fibrosis grade 2 and greater on a 0-3 scale was associated with clinical characteristics indicative of a more advanced disease, such as anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, constitutional symptoms, larger splenomegaly and a higher IPSS risk category. Patients with higher grade of fibrosis were also more likely to have additional somatic mutations in ASXL1 and EZH2, that are prognostically adverse. Median survival was significantly reduced in patients with grade 2 and 3 fibrosis as compared with grade 1; this effect was maintained when analysis was restricted to younger patients. In multivariate analysis, fibrosis grade independently predicted for survival regardless of IPSS variables and mutational status; the adverse impact of fibrosis was noticeable especially in lower IPSS risk categories. Overall, results indicate that higher grades of fibrosis correlate with unique clinical and molecular aspects and represent an independent adverse variable in patients with PMF; these observations deserve confirmation in prospectively designed series of patients. Am. J. Hematol. 91:918-922, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27264006     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  20 in total

Review 1.  Management of Myelofibrosis-Related Cytopenias.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  New Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Mansour Alfayez; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-01-24

Review 3.  SOHO State-of-the-Art Update and Next Questions: MPN.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose; Jason Gotlib; Claire N Harrison; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2018-01

Review 4.  Diagnosis, risk stratification, and response evaluation in classical myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Elisa Rumi; Mario Cazzola
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Advances in potential treatment options for myeloproliferative neoplasm associated myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Prithviraj Bose
Journal:  Expert Opin Orphan Drugs       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 0.694

6.  Mortality outcomes and survival patterns of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms in Malaysia.

Authors:  Yee Yee Yap; Jameela Sathar; Kian Boon Law
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 7.  Bone marrow fibrosis in myelofibrosis: pathogenesis, prognosis and targeted strategies.

Authors:  Abdallah Abou Zahr; Mohamed E Salama; Nicole Carreau; Douglas Tremblay; Srdan Verstovsek; Ruben Mesa; Ronald Hoffman; John Mascarenhas
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 8.  Prognostication in Philadelphia Chromosome Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: a Review of the Recent Literature.

Authors:  Amy Zhou; Amber Afzal; Stephen T Oh
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 9.  Accelerated Phase of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Omar A Shahin; Helen T Chifotides; Prithviraj Bose; Lucia Masarova; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.195

Review 10.  Inflammatory Microenvironment and Specific T Cells in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Immunopathogenesis and Novel Immunotherapies.

Authors:  Vincenzo Nasillo; Giovanni Riva; Ambra Paolini; Fabio Forghieri; Luca Roncati; Beatrice Lusenti; Monica Maccaferri; Andrea Messerotti; Valeria Pioli; Andrea Gilioli; Francesca Bettelli; Davide Giusti; Patrizia Barozzi; Ivana Lagreca; Rossana Maffei; Roberto Marasca; Leonardo Potenza; Patrizia Comoli; Rossella Manfredini; Antonino Maiorana; Enrico Tagliafico; Mario Luppi; Tommaso Trenti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.