Karla D Wagner1, L James Bovet2, Bruce Haynes3, Alfred Joshua2, Peter J Davidson4. 1. Division of Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. Electronic address: karlawagner@unr.edu. 2. San Diego Sheriff's Department, P.O. Box 939062, San Diego, CA 92193, USA. 3. Emergency Medical Services, County of San Diego Public Health Services, 6255 Mission Gorge Road, San Diego, CA 92120, USA. 4. Division of Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Training law enforcement officers (LEOs) to administer naloxone to opioid overdose victims is increasingly part of comprehensive efforts to reduce opioid overdose deaths. Such efforts could yield positive interactions between LEOs and community members and might ultimately help lower overdose death rates. METHODS: We evaluated a pilot LEO naloxone program by (1) assessing opioid overdose knowledge and attitudes (competency in responding, concerns about naloxone administration, and attitudes towards overdose victims) before and after a 30min training on overdose and naloxone administration, and (2) conducting qualitative interviews with LEOs who used naloxone to respond to overdose emergencies after the training. RESULTS: Eighty-one LEOs provided pre- and post-training data. Nearly all (89%) had responded to an overdose while serving as an LEO. Statistically significant increases were observed in nearly all items measuring opioid overdose knowledge (p's=0.04 to <0.0001). Opioid overdose competencies (p<0.001) and concerns about naloxone administration (p<0.001) significantly improved after the training, while there was no change in attitudes towards overdose victims (p=0.90). LEOs administered naloxone 11 times; nine victims survived and three of the nine surviving victims made at least one visit to substance abuse treatment as a result of a LEO-provided referral. Qualitative data suggest that LEOs had generally positive experiences when they employed the skills from the training. CONCLUSIONS: Training LEOs in naloxone administration can increase knowledge and confidence in managing opioid overdose emergencies. Perhaps most importantly, training LEOs to respond to opioid overdose emergencies may have positive effects for LEOs and overdose victims.
BACKGROUND: Training law enforcement officers (LEOs) to administer naloxone to opioid overdose victims is increasingly part of comprehensive efforts to reduce opioid overdose deaths. Such efforts could yield positive interactions between LEOs and community members and might ultimately help lower overdose death rates. METHODS: We evaluated a pilot LEO naloxone program by (1) assessing opioid overdose knowledge and attitudes (competency in responding, concerns about naloxone administration, and attitudes towards overdose victims) before and after a 30min training on overdose and naloxone administration, and (2) conducting qualitative interviews with LEOs who used naloxone to respond to overdose emergencies after the training. RESULTS: Eighty-one LEOs provided pre- and post-training data. Nearly all (89%) had responded to an overdose while serving as an LEO. Statistically significant increases were observed in nearly all items measuring opioid overdose knowledge (p's=0.04 to <0.0001). Opioid overdose competencies (p<0.001) and concerns about naloxone administration (p<0.001) significantly improved after the training, while there was no change in attitudes towards overdose victims (p=0.90). LEOs administered naloxone 11 times; nine victims survived and three of the nine surviving victims made at least one visit to substance abuse treatment as a result of a LEO-provided referral. Qualitative data suggest that LEOs had generally positive experiences when they employed the skills from the training. CONCLUSIONS: Training LEOs in naloxone administration can increase knowledge and confidence in managing opioid overdose emergencies. Perhaps most importantly, training LEOs to respond to opioid overdose emergencies may have positive effects for LEOs and overdose victims.
Authors: Rachel L Graves; Elena Andreyeva; Jeanmarie Perrone; Frances S Shofer; Raina M Merchant; Zachary F Meisel Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2019 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Jo Ann Shoup; Shane R Mueller; Ingrid A Binswanger; Anna V Williams; John Strang; Jason M Glanz Journal: Pain Med Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Christy K Scott; Michael L Dennis; Christine E Grella; Lisa Nicholson; Jamie Sumpter; Rachel Kurz; Rod Funk Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2019-08-07
Authors: Javier A Cepeda; Steffanie A Strathdee; Jaime Arredondo; Maria L Mittal; Teresita Rocha; Mario Morales; Erika Clairgue; Eliane Bustamante; Daniela Abramovitz; Irina Artamonova; Arnulfo Bañuelos; Thomas Kerr; Carlos L Magis-Rodriguez; Leo Beletsky Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2017-12