Antonella Cromi1, Ilario Candeloro2, Nicola Marconi2, Jvan Casarin2, Maurizio Serati2, Massimo Agosti3, Fabio Ghezzi2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy. Electronic address: antonellacomi@libero.it. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy. 3. Department of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Del Ponte Hospital, Varese, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether women who conceive after assisted reproductive technology (ART) are at higher risk for emergency peripartum hysterectomy. DESIGN: A case-control study using a prospectively maintained institutional database. SETTING: A tertiary referral university teaching maternity hospital. PATIENT(S): Thirty-one women who underwent peripartum hysterectomy for management of hemorrhage, and 19,902 control women. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Association between potential predictors and peripartum hysterectomy. RESULT(S): The incidence of peripartum hysterectomy was 1.7 cases per 1,000 births (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.4). After adjustment for maternal age and twin pregnancy, placenta previa (odds ratio [OR] 50.78, 95% CI 23.30-110.68), prior cesarean delivery (OR 6.72, 95% CI 2.99-15.09 for one cesarean; OR 6.80, 95% CI 1.45-31.90 for two or more cesareans), previous myomectomy (OR 24.59, 95% CI 6.70-90.19), and ART conception (OR 5.98, 95% CI 2.18-16.40) were all antenatal predictors for peripartum hysterectomy. In women having a peripartum hysterectomy, 13.4% of the risk is attributable to mode of conception. CONCLUSION(S): A history of ART increases the likelihood of needing a peripartum hysterectomy to control hemorrhage. Further investigation is needed to determine whether ART conception should be included in algorithms of risk stratification for emergency cesarean hysterectomy and plan of care be modified accordingly.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether women who conceive after assisted reproductive technology (ART) are at higher risk for emergency peripartum hysterectomy. DESIGN: A case-control study using a prospectively maintained institutional database. SETTING: A tertiary referral university teaching maternity hospital. PATIENT(S): Thirty-one women who underwent peripartum hysterectomy for management of hemorrhage, and 19,902 control women. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Association between potential predictors and peripartum hysterectomy. RESULT(S): The incidence of peripartum hysterectomy was 1.7 cases per 1,000 births (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.4). After adjustment for maternal age and twin pregnancy, placenta previa (odds ratio [OR] 50.78, 95% CI 23.30-110.68), prior cesarean delivery (OR 6.72, 95% CI 2.99-15.09 for one cesarean; OR 6.80, 95% CI 1.45-31.90 for two or more cesareans), previous myomectomy (OR 24.59, 95% CI 6.70-90.19), and ART conception (OR 5.98, 95% CI 2.18-16.40) were all antenatal predictors for peripartum hysterectomy. In women having a peripartum hysterectomy, 13.4% of the risk is attributable to mode of conception. CONCLUSION(S): A history of ART increases the likelihood of needing a peripartum hysterectomy to control hemorrhage. Further investigation is needed to determine whether ART conception should be included in algorithms of risk stratification for emergency cesarean hysterectomy and plan of care be modified accordingly.