Literature DB >> 27261978

Traditional Chinese Medicine acupuncture and myofascial trigger needling: The same stimulation points?

Lizhou Liu1, Margot A Skinner2, Suzanne M McDonough3, George David Baxter4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acupuncture originates in China, and its effectiveness has been well documented in musculoskeletal pain disorders and other conditions. A widely accepted contemporary medical treatment option for myofascial pain is trigger point needling. Although there are many differences between Traditional Chinese Medicine acupuncture theory and the myofascial trigger point needling framework, it is argued that the stimulation sites for these two needling modalities are similar. DISCUSSION: In this paper we examined the correspondence between Traditional Chinese Medicine acupoints and myofascial trigger points. Based on this correspondence, we considered exploration of Ah-shi points from four aspects: pain recognition, distal Ah-shi points, Anti-Ah-shi points, and management approaches.
SUMMARY: The extent of correspondence is influenced by definitions of acupoints. Myofascial trigger points are significantly correlated to Traditional Chinese Medicine acupoints, including primary channel acupoints, extra acupoints, and Ah-shi points. Considering the correlation between MTrPs and acupoints and the rarely-studied research area of Ah-shi points, it may be reasonable to incorporate research findings of myofascial trigger points into further investigations into Ah-shi points. Correspondence between myofascial trigger points and acupoints enhances contemporary understanding of the mechanism of action of acupuncture, and may serve to facilitate increased integration of acupuncture into clinical management.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acupoints; Acupuncture trigger point therapy; Ah-shi points; Dry needling; Intramuscular needling; Myofascial trigger point needling; Myofascial trigger points; Pain; Traditional Chinese Medicine acupuncture

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27261978     DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Complement Ther Med        ISSN: 0965-2299            Impact factor:   2.446


  4 in total

Review 1.  Evidence and expert opinions: Dry needling versus acupuncture (II) : The American Alliance for Professional Acupuncture Safety (AAPAS) White Paper 2016.

Authors:  Arthur Yin Fan; Jun Xu; Yong-Ming Li
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 1.978

Review 2.  Is dry needling effective for low back pain?: A systematic review and PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

Authors:  Han-Tong Hu; Hong Gao; Rui-Jie Ma; Xiao-Feng Zhao; Hong-Fang Tian; Lu Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Comparison of the effects between lasers applied to myofascial trigger points and to classical acupoints for patients with cervical myofascial pain syndrome.

Authors:  Wei-Han Chang; Li-Wen Tu; Yu-Cheng Pei; Chih-Kuang Chen; Szu-Heng Wang; Alice Mk Wong
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 4.  Needling Interventions for Sciatica: Choosing Methods Based on Neuropathic Pain Mechanisms-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Thomas Perreault; César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas; Mike Cummings; Barry C Gendron
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.