Literature DB >> 27261637

Hospital Phenotypes in the Management of Patients Admitted for Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Xiao Xu1, Shu-Xia Li, Haiqun Lin, Sharon-Lise T Normand, Tara Lagu, Nihar Desai, Michael Duan, Eugene A Kroch, Harlan M Krumholz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To characterize hospital phenotypes by their combined utilization pattern of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions for patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). RESEARCH
DESIGN: Using the Premier Analytical Database, we identified 129,138 hospitalizations for AMI from 246 hospitals with the capacity for performing open-heart surgery during 2010-2013. We calculated year-specific, risk-standardized estimates of PCI procedure rates, CABG procedure rates, and ICU admission rates for each hospital, adjusting for patient clinical characteristics and within-hospital correlation of patients. We used a mixture modeling approach to identify groups of hospitals (ie, hospital phenotypes) that exhibit distinct longitudinal patterns of risk-standardized PCI, CABG, and ICU admission rates.
RESULTS: We identified 3 distinct phenotypes among the 246 hospitals: (1) high PCI-low CABG-high ICU admission (39.2% of the hospitals), (2) high PCI-low CABG-low ICU admission (30.5%), and (3) low PCI-high CABG-moderate ICU admission (30.4%). Hospitals in the high PCI-low CABG-high ICU admission phenotype had significantly higher risk-standardized in-hospital costs and 30-day risk-standardized payment yet similar risk-standardized mortality and readmission rates compared with hospitals in the low PCI-high CABG-moderate ICU admission phenotype. Hospitals in these phenotypes differed by geographic region.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals differ in how they manage patients hospitalized for AMI. Their distinctive practice patterns suggest that some hospital phenotypes may be more successful in producing good outcomes at lower cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27261637      PMCID: PMC5305177          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  21 in total

1.  Variation in hospital mortality rates for patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Jeph Herrin; Leslie Curry; Emily J Cherlin; Yongfei Wang; Tashonna R Webster; Elizabeth E Drye; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Variations in hospitalisation costs for acute myocardial infarction - a comparison across Europe.

Authors:  Oliver Tiemann
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  What hospital inpatient services contributed the most to the 2001-2006 growth in the cost per case?

Authors:  Jared Lane K Maeda; Susan O Raetzman; Bernard S Friedman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  "Phenotyping" hospital value of care for patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Shu-Xia Li; Haiqun Lin; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Nancy Kim; Lesli S Ott; Tara Lagu; Michael Duan; Eugene A Kroch; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Impact of underuse, overuse, and discretionary use on geographic variation in the use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  E Guadagnoli; M B Landrum; S L Normand; J Z Ayanian; P Garg; P J Hauptman; T J Ryan; B J McNeil
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Survival after acute myocardial infarction (SAMI) study: the design and implementation of a positive deviance study.

Authors:  Harlan M Krumholz; Leslie A Curry; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Mortality and treatment patterns among patients hospitalized with acute cardiovascular conditions during dates of national cardiology meetings.

Authors:  Anupam B Jena; Vinay Prasad; Dana P Goldman; John Romley
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Understanding individual and small area variation in the underuse of coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Pushkal P Garg; Mary Beth Landrum; Sharon-Lise T Normand; John Z Ayanian; Paul J Hauptman; Thomas J Ryan; Barbara J McNeil; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with an acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Harlan M Krumholz; Yun Wang; Jennifer A Mattera; Yongfei Wang; Lein Fang Han; Melvin J Ingber; Sheila Roman; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Big data and new knowledge in medicine: the thinking, training, and tools needed for a learning health system.

Authors:  Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  1 in total

1.  Privacy-Preserving Tensor Factorization for Collaborative Health Data Analysis.

Authors:  Jing Ma; Qiuchen Zhang; Jian Lou; Joyce C Ho; Li Xiong; Xiaoqian Jiang
Journal:  Proc ACM Int Conf Inf Knowl Manag       Date:  2019-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.