Yi Chen1, Haiming Yu2, Chao Wu2, Jinyu Li2, Shunchang Jiao3, Yi Hu2, Haitao Tao2, Baishou Wu2, Aijie Li2. 1. Medical Center Tsinghua University, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China. 3. Department of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China. Electronic address: changjiao84@126.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Little data exists with respect to the relationship between the level of plasma D-dimer and prognosis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC).The aim of this study was to investigate whether the levels of plasma D-dimer could be served as a prognostic factor in patients with SCLC. METHODS: A total of 393 patients with SCLC were addressed in the present retrospective study. Plasma D-dimer levels were measured by immunoturbidimetric assay. The correlation between plasma D-dimer levels and other clinical features, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed statistically. RESULTS: The plasma D-dimer levels were significantly correlated with karnofsky performance status (KPS), tumor stage, number of metastatic sites, and treatment response. The PFS and OS of patients with elevated D-dimer levels before chemotherapy were significantly shorter than that of patients with normal D-dimer levels (PFS: 6.2 months versus 9.6 months, P<0.001; OS: 15.7 months versus 24.4 months, P<0.001). The patients with D-dimer levels converting from high to normal had better PFS and OS than those with D-dimer levels remaining high after two cycles of chemotherapy. According to multivariate analysis, elevated D-dimer level was confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor for worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated plasma D-dimer level could be served as an independent determinant of poor prognosis in patients with SCLC.
OBJECTIVE: Little data exists with respect to the relationship between the level of plasma D-dimer and prognosis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC).The aim of this study was to investigate whether the levels of plasma D-dimer could be served as a prognostic factor in patients with SCLC. METHODS: A total of 393 patients with SCLC were addressed in the present retrospective study. Plasma D-dimer levels were measured by immunoturbidimetric assay. The correlation between plasma D-dimer levels and other clinical features, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed statistically. RESULTS: The plasma D-dimer levels were significantly correlated with karnofsky performance status (KPS), tumor stage, number of metastatic sites, and treatment response. The PFS and OS of patients with elevated D-dimer levels before chemotherapy were significantly shorter than that of patients with normal D-dimer levels (PFS: 6.2 months versus 9.6 months, P<0.001; OS: 15.7 months versus 24.4 months, P<0.001). The patients with D-dimer levels converting from high to normal had better PFS and OS than those with D-dimer levels remaining high after two cycles of chemotherapy. According to multivariate analysis, elevated D-dimer level was confirmed to be an independent prognostic factor for worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated plasma D-dimer level could be served as an independent determinant of poor prognosis in patients with SCLC.