Seonjong Lee1, Moon Soo Park1, Yong-Chan Kim1, Tae-Hwan Kim2. 1. Spine Center, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 896, Pyeongchon-Dong, Anyang City, Gyeonggi-Do, 431-070, Korea. 2. Spine Center, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 896, Pyeongchon-Dong, Anyang City, Gyeonggi-Do, 431-070, Korea. paragon0823@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the clinical and radiologic outcome of osteoporotic thoracolumbar junctional fracture accompanied by spinous process fracture (SPF) without posterior ligament injury. METHODS: A total of 391 patients with single-level osteoporotic thoracolumbar junctional (T10-L2) fracture were selectively enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups by absence (group I) or presence (group II) of SPF. Clinical and radiologic parameters were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Group I comprised of 332 patients with only vertebral body fracture, and group II comprised of 59 patients with both vertebral body and SPFs. In all cases of group II, SPFs were located just one level above the fractured vertebral body, and the injury of the posterior ligament was not found. At the time of injury, group II patients showed worse outcomes in anterior vertebral body compression percentage, kyphotic Cobb angle, cranial disk status, and the rate of the initial neurologic injury. Kyphotic alignment changes during 1-year follow-up were compared between the conservative subgroups of groups I and II. At the time of injury, there were no statistical differences in anterior vertebral body compression percentage and Cobb angle between the two conservative subgroups. However, the difference was significant after 1-year follow-up. Comparison of kyphotic alignment change at 12 months after diagnosis within group II was done according to the treatment method. Vertebroplasty subgroup in group II did not show benefit even in preventing such kyphotic alignment change, whereas instrumentation subgroup in group II showed lordotic alignment restoration despite more severe kyphotic alignment at the time of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporotic thoracolumbar junctional fracture accompanied by spinous process fracture without posterior ligament injury represented more severe injury with flexion forces on the anterior column and tensile forces on the posterior column, and was related with more severe posttraumatic kyphotic changes during the 12-month follow-up.
PURPOSE: To assess the clinical and radiologic outcome of osteoporotic thoracolumbar junctional fracture accompanied by spinous process fracture (SPF) without posterior ligament injury. METHODS: A total of 391 patients with single-level osteoporotic thoracolumbar junctional (T10-L2) fracture were selectively enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups by absence (group I) or presence (group II) of SPF. Clinical and radiologic parameters were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Group I comprised of 332 patients with only vertebral body fracture, and group II comprised of 59 patients with both vertebral body and SPFs. In all cases of group II, SPFs were located just one level above the fractured vertebral body, and the injury of the posterior ligament was not found. At the time of injury, group II patients showed worse outcomes in anterior vertebral body compression percentage, kyphotic Cobb angle, cranial disk status, and the rate of the initial neurologic injury. Kyphotic alignment changes during 1-year follow-up were compared between the conservative subgroups of groups I and II. At the time of injury, there were no statistical differences in anterior vertebral body compression percentage and Cobb angle between the two conservative subgroups. However, the difference was significant after 1-year follow-up. Comparison of kyphotic alignment change at 12 months after diagnosis within group II was done according to the treatment method. Vertebroplasty subgroup in group II did not show benefit even in preventing such kyphotic alignment change, whereas instrumentation subgroup in group II showed lordotic alignment restoration despite more severe kyphotic alignment at the time of injury. CONCLUSIONS:Osteoporotic thoracolumbar junctional fracture accompanied by spinous process fracture without posterior ligament injury represented more severe injury with flexion forces on the anterior column and tensile forces on the posterior column, and was related with more severe posttraumatic kyphotic changes during the 12-month follow-up.
Authors: Ory Keynan; Charles G Fisher; Alexander Vaccaro; Michael G Fehlings; F C Oner; John Dietz; Brian Kwon; Raj Rampersaud; Christopher Bono; John France; Marcel Dvorak Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-03-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: M Reinhold; C Knop; R Beisse; L Audigé; F Kandziora; A Pizanis; R Pranzl; E Gercek; M Schultheiss; A Weckbach; V Bühren; M Blauth Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Alexander R Vaccaro; Jeffrey A Rihn; Davor Saravanja; David G Anderson; Alan S Hilibrand; Todd J Albert; Michael G Fehlings; William Morrison; Adam E Flanders; John C France; Paul Arnold; Paul A Anderson; Brian Friel; David Malfair; John Street; Brian Kwon; Scott Paquette; Michael Boyd; Marcel F S Dvorak; Charles Fisher Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2009-11-01 Impact factor: 3.468