Literature DB >> 27260168

Development of a measure (ICECAP-Close Person Measure) through qualitative methods to capture the benefits of end-of-life care to those close to the dying for use in economic evaluation.

Alastair Canaway1, Hareth Al-Janabi2, Philip Kinghorn2, Cara Bailey2, Joanna Coast3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: End-of-life care affects both the patient and those close to them. Typically, those close to the patient are not considered within economic evaluation, which may lead to the omission of important benefits resulting from end-of-life care. AIM: To develop an outcome measure suitable for use in economic evaluation that captures the benefits of end-of-life care to those close to the dying.
DESIGN: To develop the descriptive system for the outcome measure, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with the participants and constant comparative analysis methods were used to develop a descriptive system for the measure. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven individuals bereaved within the last 2 years or with a close-person currently receiving end-of-life care were purposively recruited into the study. Participants were recruited through newsletters, adverts, snowball sampling and a local hospice.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven individuals were recruited. A measure of capability with six attributes, each with five levels, was developed based on themes arising from the analysis. Attributes comprise the following: good communication with services, privacy and space to be with the loved one, emotional support, practical support, being able to prepare and cope and being free from emotional distress related to the condition of the decedent.
CONCLUSION: This measure is designed to capture the benefits of end-of-life care to close-persons for use in economic evaluation. Further research should value the measure and develop methods for incorporating outcomes for close-persons into economic evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bereavement; capability approach; economic evaluation; outcome assessment; palliative care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27260168     DOI: 10.1177/0269216316650616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  14 in total

1.  Reporting Formative Qualitative Research to Support the Development of Quantitative Preference Study Protocols and Corresponding Survey Instruments: Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers.

Authors:  Ilene L Hollin; Benjamin M Craig; Joanna Coast; Kathleen Beusterien; Caroline Vass; Rachael DiSantostefano; Holly Peay
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Close-Person Spill-Overs in End-of-Life Care: Using Hierarchical Mapping to Identify Whose Outcomes to Include in Economic Evaluations.

Authors:  Alastair Canaway; Hareth Al-Janabi; Philip Kinghorn; Cara Bailey; Joanna Coast
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Empirical Validity of a Generic, Preference-Based Capability Wellbeing Instrument (ICECAP-A) in the Context of Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Cassandra Mah; Vanessa K Noonan; Stirling Bryan; David G T Whitehurst
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  "It is not a scientific number it is just a feeling": Populating a multi-dimensional end-of-life decision framework using deliberative methods.

Authors:  Joanna Coast; Cara Bailey; Alastair Canaway; Philip Kinghorn
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Assessing the capability to experience a 'good death': A qualitative study to directly elicit expert views on a new supportive care measure grounded in Sen's capability approach.

Authors:  Philip Kinghorn; Joanna Coast
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Do capability and functioning differ? A study of U.K. survey responses.

Authors:  Hareth Al-Janabi
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Proxy responses to ICECAP-A: Exploring variation across multiple proxy assessments of capability well-being for the same individuals.

Authors:  Philip Kinghorn; Nafsika Afentou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Capability instruments in economic evaluations of health-related interventions: a comparative review of the literature.

Authors:  Timea Mariann Helter; Joanna Coast; Agata Łaszewska; Tanja Stamm; Judit Simon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Caring for Carers: Positive and Normative Challenges for Future Research on Carer Spillover Effects in Economic Evaluation.

Authors:  Padraig Dixon; Jeff Round
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.725

10.  Selection and validation of a classification system for a child-centred preference-based measure of oral health-related quality of life specific to dental caries.

Authors:  Helen J Rogers; Fiona Gilchrist; Zoe Marshman; Helen D Rodd; Donna Rowen
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2020-12-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.