Literature DB >> 27260142

Leishmania infantum-specific production of IFN-γ and IL-10 in stimulated blood from dogs with clinical leishmaniosis.

Laia Solano-Gallego1, Sara Montserrrat-Sangrà2, Laura Ordeix2,3, Pamela Martínez-Orellana2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is limited information available on cytokine profiles in dogs with different degrees of disease severity due to natural infection of Leishmania infantum. The aim of this study was to investigate L. infantum-specific IFN-γ and IL-10 production in blood from dogs with leishmaniosis at diagnosis and correlate these findings with disease severity, humoral immune response and blood parasitemia.
METHODS: Sixty dogs were diagnosed based on physical examination, routine laboratory tests, L. infantum-specific antibody levels measured by quantitative ELISA and blood parasitemia by real-time PCR. Heparin whole blood was stimulated with L. infantum soluble antigen (LSA) and concanavalin A (ConA) and incubated for 5 days. IFN-γ and IL-10 concentrations were measured in supernatants with sandwich ELISAs.
RESULTS: The majority of dogs (n = 36) were classified as LeishVet stage II (moderate disease). The rest of the dogs were classified as stage I (n = 10), III (n = 10) and IV (n = 4). Dogs classified with stage I and IIa presented significantly higher (P = 0.02) LSA IFN-γ concentrations, lower (P <0.0001) antibody levels and a tendency for lower blood parasitemia (P = 0.1) than dogs classified with stages IIb, III or IV while no differences in ConA IFN-γ or IL-10 concentrations were observed among groups. Thirty-five dogs produced significantly higher LSA IFN-γ (mean ± SD: 2320 ± 3960 pg/ml) and ConA IFN-γ (mean ± SD: 7887 ± 7273 pg/ml) when compared with 25 dogs that did not produce detectable LSA IFN-γ but produced ConA IFN-γ (mean ± SD: 4917 ± 5233 pg/ml). IFN-γ producer dogs presented lower (mean ± SD: 5750 ± 14,082 ELISA units (EU), P = 0.001) antibody levels and blood parasitemia (mean ± SD:   5 ± 10 parasites/ml, P = 0.001) when compared with IFN-γ non-producers (mean ± SD: 19,638 ± 28,596 EU and 1100 ± 5112 parasites/ml), respectively. LSA IL-10 was not detectable in 34 dogs while 49 dogs secreted ConA IL-10 (mean ± SD of 90 ± 103 pg/ml). LSA IFN-γ concentration was negatively correlated with blood parasitemia and antibody levels and positively correlated with ConA IFN-γ and LSA IL-10 concentrations.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that sick dogs lacking L. infantum specific IFN-γ production in stimulated whole blood produce a strong humoral response, have a high blood parasitemia and severe clinical disease. IL-10 does not appear to be a marker of disease severity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical staging; Disease; Dog; IFN-γ; IL-10; Leishmania infantum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27260142      PMCID: PMC4893235          DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1598-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasit Vectors        ISSN: 1756-3305            Impact factor:   3.876


Background

Species of Leishmania are obligate intracellular protozoan parasites that are transmitted by female phlebotomine sandflies. Canine leishmaniosis is a zoonotic disease caused by several species of Leishmania. Although other Leishmania species have been reported to infect dogs such as L. major [1], L. tropica and L. braziliensis [2-4], Leishmania infantum is the most common species in the Mediterranean basin [5, 6]. Dogs are considered the principal reservoir for leishmaniosis in people due to L. infantum in the Mediterranean basin, Middle East and South America [5]. Both innate and adaptive immune responses play a role in the outcome of Leishmania infection. Classically, the major role against the parasite is played by the adaptive immune response, characterized by the balance between T-helper 1 (Th1) and T-helper 2 (Th2) response. Th1 secrete interleukin-2 (IL-2), TNF-alpha and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and this response is associated with controlling infection while Th2 cells secrete interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-5 (IL-5), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and transformation growth factor beta (TGF-β) and correlate with disease progression [7, 8]. Dogs show a broad range of clinical manifestations and immune responses [9] in canine leishmaniosis. Canine L. infantum infection can manifest as a chronic subclinical infection, self-limiting disease, or non-self-limiting illness [5, 6] as in humans [10]. In addition, several degrees of disease severity are found in dogs ranging from mild disease to severe fatal disease with different clinical outcomes, prognosis and treatment options. Therefore, a clinical staging system is currently used in the clinical setting [6]. The two extremes of this clinical spectrum are characterized by: (1) “Resistant” healthy dogs with a protective CD4+ T-cell-mediated immune response characterized by production of Th1 cytokines-like such as IFN-γ, IL-2 and TNF-α, which induce anti-Leishmania activity by apoptosis of parasites in macrophages via nitric oxide (NO) metabolism [11], and (2) sick dogs which are characterized by a marked humoral immune response, absent or reduced cell mediated immunity with high levels of IL- 10 and TGF-β and high parasite burden, which is detrimental to the animal [5, 12]. Unfortunately, there are few and poorly standardized assays to evaluate T-cell mediated immunity responses [13] such as leishmanin skin test [14, 15] and lymphocyte proliferation [16, 17] in the dog. The results of cytokine profiles in canines with L. infantum infection are frequently limited and fragmentary [9]. Cytokines including IFN-γ and IL-10 have been studied in several organs with different techniques in dogs with poorly defined clinical classification and different states of infection [5, 9]. In addition, cytokines have been mainly investigated in vaccinated [18] or in experimentally-infected dogs [17] but limited information is available in sick dogs with different degrees of disease severity due to L. infantum natural infection [17, 19]. The aim of this study was to investigate L. infantum-specific IFN-γ and IL-10 production in stimulated blood in dogs with clinical leishmaniosis at the time of diagnosis and correlate these with disease severity, the humoral immune response and blood parasitemia.

Methods

Dogs

Sixty dogs with clinical leishmaniosis were prospectively enrolled from January 2014 to February 2016 at the time of diagnosis. The dogs were from different Catalonian and Balearic veterinary centers from Spain: Fundació Hospital Clínic Veterinari (Bellaterra, Barcelona), Hospital Ars Veterinaria (Barcelona), Hospital Mediterrani Veterinaris (Reus, Tarragona), Consultori Montsant (Falset, Tarragona) and Hospital Mon Veterinari (Manacor, Mallorca). The diagnosis of canine leishmaniosis was made based on the results of the physical examination, a complete blood count (CBC) using Siemens Advia 120 Haematology System (Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Germany), a biochemical profile including creatinine, urea, total proteins, ALT and total cholesterol by Olympus AU400 Chemistry Analyzer (CLIAwaived, USA), protein serum electrophoresis by Hydrasys® (Sebia Electrophoresis, USA), urinalysis with urinary protein/creatinine ratio (UPC) and quantitative serology for the detection of L. infantum specific antibodies by means of a serial dilution in house ELISA [20-22]. Cytological evaluation of any lesion or cutaneous histology and/or immunohistochemistry for Leishmania was also performed in some cases as described elsewhere when needed [23]. In addition, DNA was extracted from blood samples and L. infantum real-time PCR (RT-PCR) was performed with an absolute quantification as previously described [22, 24]. Dogs were classified in four clinical stages (stage I-mild disease, II-moderate disease including substages IIa and IIb, III-severe disease and IV-very severe disease) at the time of diagnosis as previously described [6].

Whole blood assay

The leucocyte concentration including lymphocyte and neutrophil concentrations was very similar between dogs measured by a CBC. Heparinized blood was diluted to a ratio of 1:10 with Rosewell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium with stable glutamine and 25 mM hepes (Biowest®, USA) supplemented with 60 μg/ml of penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Life Technologies™, USA) and 10 % Fetal Bovine Serum Premium South America Origin (Biowest®, USA). Five hundred μl of heparinized blood was mixed with 4.5 ml of complete medium as described above per each well and incubated in 12-well flat bottom plastic culture plates 3596 (Costar® Corning, NY, USA). Three different treatment conditions were established: (i) medium alone; (ii) medium with L. infantum soluble antigen (LSA) at a concentration of 10 μg/ml provided by Dr. Cristina Riera (Facultat de Farmacia, Universitat de Barcelona); and (iii) medium with mitogen concanavalin A (ConA) (100 mg Medicago®, Sweden) at a concentration of 10 μg/ml. The plates were incubated for 5 days at 37 °C in 5 % of CO2 air. Following incubation, blood was centrifuged at 300 g for 10 minutes and the supernatant was collected and stored at -80 °C until used.

Sandwich ELISAs for the determination of IFN-γ and IL-10

Cytokine analysis of IFN-γ (n = 60) and IL-10 (n = 53) were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (DuoSet® ELISA by Development System R&DTM, UK) using 96 well cell flat bottom plates (Costar® Corning, USA). Slight modifications were done for the IFN-γ and IL-10 ELISAs. The standard curve for IFN-γ started with 8000 pg/ml and two-fold dilutions were made until 62.5 pg/ml concentration. Standard curve for IL-10 started with 2000 pg/ml and two-fold dilutions were made until 15.6 pg/ml concentration was obtained. Supernatants treated with ConA were diluted 1:1 with reagent diluent. Duplicates of all supernatants studied were performed in all ELISAs. Optical density was measured with an ELISA reader (Anthos 2020) at wavelength of 450 nm. The standard curve for each cytokine was calculated using a computer generated four parameter logistic curve-fit with program MyAssays (http://www.myassays.com/). Plates were repeated when R2-value of standard curve was below 0.98. Dogs were classified as IFN-γ producers when L. infantum specific IFN-γ concentration was detectable after subtracting medium alone. Dogs were classified as IFN-γ non-producers when L. infantum specific IFN-γ concentration subtracting medium alone was at not detectable levels. IL-10 detectable concentrations were considered after subtracting medium alone for LSA and ConA stimulations.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 22.0 for Windows software (SPSS Inc., USA). A non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare groups. A non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare paired continuous variables. The Spearman’s correlation was used to evaluate differences in cytokine production, the level of antibodies and blood parasitemia of the dogs studied. Differences were considered significant with a 5 % significance level (P < 0.05).

Results

Description of clinical data of dogs, clinical staging and specific L. infantum IFN-γ response classifications

Both sexes were represented by 25 females and 35 males. The median of age was four years with a range from five months to 12 years. Forty-four purebred dogs belonging to more than 25 breeds and 16 mixed breed dogs were included. Based on clinicopathological findings and serological tests, the majority of dogs (n = 36) were classified as LeishVet stage II (moderate disease) and this stage was further divided into stage IIa (n = 27) and stage IIb (n = 9). The rest of the dogs were classified as stage I (n = 10), stage III (n = 10) and stage IV (n = 4). All dogs in stage I were diagnosed with papular dermatitis due to L. infantum and presented negative to low positive antibody levels. The rest of dogs presented typical clinicopathological findings and mainly medium to high positive antibody levels. The results of signalment, serology, clinical signs and laboratory abnormalities observed in dogs with clinical leishmaniosis classified in four clinical stages are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinicopathological findings in dogs with clinical leishmaniosis based on LeishVet clinical staging [6]

Clinical stagingGender/median [range] of age in monthsSerologyClinical signs (number of dogs/total number of dogs, %)Laboratory findings (number of dogs/total number of dogs, %)
I-mild disease (n = 10)5 females and 4 males/15.2 [5–40]Negative to low positiveantibody levelsPapular dermatitis (10/10, 100 %)No abnormalities observed
IIa-moderate disease (n = 27)11 females and 16 males/51 [5–153]Low to high positive antibody levelsCutaneous lesions (20/27, 74 %):• Exfoliative dermatitis (9/27, 33 %)• Ulcerative dermatitis (9/27, 33 %)• Alopecia (7/27, 26 %)• Nodular dermatitis (3/27, 11 %)• Papular dermatitis (2/27, 7 %)• Ischemic dermatopathy (1/27, 4 %)Lymphadenomegaly (19/27, 70 %)Weight loss (8/27, 30 %)Fever (5/27, 19 %)Ocular lesions (4/27, 15 %): • Conjunctivitis (3/27, 11 %)• Blepharitis (1/27, 4 %)Lameness (4/27, 15 %)Vomiting and/or diarrhea (2/27, 7 %)Inspiratory dyspnea (1/27, 4 %)Masseter myositis (1/27, 4 %)Muscle atrophy (1/27, 4 %)Epistaxis (1/27, 4 %)Mild to moderate normocytic normochromic non-regenerative anemia (8/26, 31 %; 3/26, 12 %, respectively)Mild leukocytosis with mature neutrophilia (2/26, 8 %)Mild to moderate thrombocytopenia (2/26, 8 %)Mild leucopenia with lymphopenia and neutropenia (2/26, 8 %)Hyperproteinemia (13/27, 48 %)Hypergammaglobulinemia (14/27, 52 %)Hyperbetaglobulinemia (15/27, 55 %)Hypoalbuminemia (6/26, 23 %)
IIb-moderate disease (n = 9)2 females and 9 males/43 [9–147]Medium to high positive antibody levelsCutaneous lesions (7/9, 77 %):• Exfoliative dermatitis (3/9, 33 %)• Ulcerative dermatitis (3/9, 33 %)• Alopecia (2/9, 22 %)Lymphadenomegaly (6/9, 67 %)Weight loss (5/9, 56 %)Ocular lesions (4/9, 44 %):• Conjunctivitis (2/9, 22 %)• Bilateral blepharitis (2/9, 22 %)Vomiting and/or diarrhea (3/9, 33 %)Lethargy (2/9, 22 %)Lameness and articular pain (1/9, 33 %)Polyuria and polydipsia (1/9, 11 %)Mild to moderate normocytic normochromic non-regenerative anemia (6/9, 67 %; 2/9, 22 %, respectively)Mild leukocytosis with mild mature neutrophilia (2/9, 22 %)Lymphopenia (3/9, 33 %)Hyperproteinemia (7/9, 77 %)Hypergammaglobulinemia (9/9, 100 %)Hyperbetaglobulinemia (6/9, 66 %)Hypoalbuminemia (6/9, 66 %)
III-severe disease (n = 10)5 females and 4 males/85 [37–132]Medium to high positive antibody levelsLymphadenomegaly (7/10, 70 %)Cutaneous lesions (6/10, 60 %):• Exfoliative dermatitis (4/10, 40 %)• Alopecia (1/10, 10 %)• Ulcerative dermatitis (2/10, 20 %)Weight loss (5/10, 50 %)Ocular lesions (3/10, 30 %):• Bilateral blepharitis (1/10, 10 %)• Conjunctivitis (1/10, 10 %)• Superficial keratitis (1/10, 10 %)Lethargy and anorexia (2/10, 20 %)Vomiting and/or diarrhea (2/10, 20 %)Splenomegaly (2/10, 20 %)Lameness and articular pain (1/10, 10 %)Muscle atrophy (1/10, 10 %)Epistaxis (1/10, 11 %)Polyuria and polydipsia (1/10, 10 %)Fever (1/10, 10 %)Chronic weakness (1/10, 10 %)Mild normocytic normochromic non-regenerative anemia (6/9, 67 %)Moderate regenerative anemia (2/9, 22 %)Thrombocytosis (1/9, 11 %)Mild thrombocytopenia (1/9, 11 %)Mild leukocytosis with mature neutrophilia (2/9, 22 %)Mild leukopenia with lymphopenia and neutropenia (1/9, 11 %)Lymphopenia (1/9, 11 %)Mild lymphocytosis (1/9, 11 %)Hyperproteinemia (8/10, 80 %)Hypergammaglobulinemia (9/10, 90 %)Hyperbetaglobulinemia (9/10, 90 %)Hypoalbuminemia (9/10, 90 %)Proteinuria (UPC) (10/10, 100 %)
IV-very severe disease (n = 4)2 females and 2 males/7.5 [23–120]Medium to high positive antibody levelsWeight loss (3/4, 75 %)Cutaneous lesions (3/4, 75 %):• Exfoliative dermatitis (2/4, 50 %)• Ulcerative dermatitis (1/4, 25 %)• Onicogriphosis (1/4, 25 %)• Ulcerative and nodular blepharitis (1/4, 25 %)Vomiting and/or diarrhea (2/4, 50 %)Lymphadenomegaly (1/4, 25 %)Cachexy (1/4, 25 %)Hypertension (1/4, 25 %)Cardiac insufficiency (1/4, 25 %)Keratoconjunctivitis (1/4, 25 %)Chronic weakness (1/4, 25 %)Paraparesis (1/4, 25 %)Mild normocytic normochromic non regenerative anemia (1/4, 25 %; 3/4, 75 %, respectively)Thrombocytosis (2/4, 50 %)Lymphopenia (1/4, 25 %)Mild leukocytosis with mature neutrophilia (1/4, 25 %)Total protein (4/4, 100 %)Hypoalbuminemia ((4/4, 100 %)Hypergammaglobulinemia (3/3, 100 %)Hyperbetaglobulinemia (3/3, 100 %)Proteinuria (UPC) (4/4, 100 %)Renal azotemia (3/3, 100 %)

UPC: urinary protein creatinine ratio

Clinicopathological findings in dogs with clinical leishmaniosis based on LeishVet clinical staging [6] UPC: urinary protein creatinine ratio Thirty-five dogs (58 %) were classified as IFN-γ producers. The clinical staging of these dogs was: nine dogs had stage I (25.7 %), 17 dogs stage IIa (48.5 %), three dogs stage IIb (8.5 %), five dogs stage III (14.2 %) and one dog stage IV (2.8 %) (Fig. 1a). In contrast, 25 dogs did not secrete IFN-γ after LSA stimulation. All 25 dogs (42 %) were classified as IFN-γ non-producers. The clinical staging of IFN-γ non-producers was as follows: one dog (4 %) was classified as stage I; ten dogs as stage IIa (40 %); six dogs as stage IIb (24 %); five dogs as stage III (20 %) and three dogs (12 %) as stage IV (Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1

Percentages of sick dogs according with IFN-γ production after LSA stimulation and clinical staging. a IFN-γ producers (n = 35) and b IFN-γ non-producers (n = 25)

Percentages of sick dogs according with IFN-γ production after LSA stimulation and clinical staging. a IFN-γ producers (n = 35) and b IFN-γ non-producers (n = 25)

Antibody response

The results of antibody levels based on clinical staging and IFN-γ classification are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Dogs classified with stage I and IIa presented significantly lower antibodies (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -4.37, P < 0.0001) (mean±SD: 4050 ± 9947 EU) than dogs classified with stages IIb, III or IV (mean±SD: 23,580 ± 30,308 EU).
Table 2

Summary of parameters studied based on clinical staging distribution of sick dogs

Clinical stagingMean ± standard deviation
Number of dogsIFN-γ LSA (pg/ml)IFN-γ ConA (pg/ml)IL-10 LSA (pg/ml)IL-10 ConA (pg/ml)PCR (parasite/ml)ELISA (EU)
I102022 ± 2687h 4029 ± 3942i 17 ± 1882 ± 463.7 ± 10.4d 46 ± 51a
IIa271909 ± 43737943 ± 7115j 8 ± 1457 ± 506 ± 10e 5533 ± 11338b
IIb9539 ± 12316777 ± 60687 ± 14144 ± 130101 ± 285f 23,287 ± 27636
III10423 ± 6298004 ± 7914k 15 ± 1994 ± 16720 ± 26g 12,416 ± 20,227c
IV494 ± 187792 ± 3505 ± 977 ± 1126337 ± 1250152,151 ± 44,365
Total601354 ± 32206649 ± 661810 ± 1583 ± 102458 ± 329311,537 ± 22,240

Parameters under study were evaluated in relationship to clinical staging and letters from a to b correspond to statistically significant findings

Results for ELISA units aI < IIa, IIb, III, IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -3.7, P < 0.0001); bIIa > I (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -4.4, P < 0.0001) and IIa < IIb, IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.7, P = 0.002); cIII < IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.1, P = 0.036)

Results for PCR dI < IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.8, P < 0,002); eIIa < IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -3.1, P < 0.0001); fIIb < IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.2, P = 0.028); g III < IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.2, P = 0.024)

Results for IFN-γ LSA hI > IIb, III, IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.1, P < 0.035)

Results for IFN-γ ConA iI>IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.1, P = 0.036); jIIa > IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.7, P = 0.003); kIII > IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.5, P = 0.008)

Abbreviations: LSA L. infantum soluble antigen, ConA concavalin A

Table 3

Summary of parameters based on IFN-γ producer versus IFN-γ non-producer dogs

Clinical stagingIFN-γ producers (mean ± standard deviation)IFN-γ non-producers (mean ± standard deviation)
Number of dogsIFN-γ LSA (pg/ml)IL-10 LSA (pg/ml)PCR (parasite/ml)ELISA (EU)Number of dogsIFN-γ LSA (pg/ml)IL-10 LSA (pg/ml)PCR (parasite/ml)ELISA (EU)
I92247 ± 274918 ± 204.1 ± 1150 ± 5310 ± 015 ± 00 ± 013 ± 0
IIa173031 ± 524012 ± 162 ± 42660 ± 7140100 ± 03 ± 812 ± 1410,418 ± 15,420
IIb31616 ± 186014 ± 230.1 ± 0.114,373 ± 15,47360 ± 03.3 ± 8162 ± 36027,744 ± 32,476
III5846 ± 66529 ± 1812 ± 197755 ± 559050 ± 00 ± 029 ± 3117,077 ± 28,897
IV1375 ± 019 ± 035 ± 073,701 ± 030 ± 00 ± 08438 ± 14,41944,967 ± 51,408
Total352320 ± 3961a 16 ± 18b 5 ± 105750 ± 14,082250 ± 02.4 ± 71100 ± 5112c 19,638 ± 28,596d

Statistical study was performed to compare IFN-γ producers versus non-IFN-γ producers. Letters a to d correspond to statistically significant differences

Results for IFN-γ LSA, IFN-γa producers > non-IFN-γ producers (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -6.7, P < 0.0001)

Results for IL-10 LSA, IFN-γb producers > non-IFN-γ producers (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -3.60, P < 0.0001)

Results for PCR, IFN-γc producers< non-IFN-γ producers (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -3.2, P = 0.001)

Results for ELISA units, IFN-γd producers< non-IFN-γ producers (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -3.2, P = 0.001)

Abbreviations: LSA L. infantum soluble antigen

Summary of parameters studied based on clinical staging distribution of sick dogs Parameters under study were evaluated in relationship to clinical staging and letters from a to b correspond to statistically significant findings Results for ELISA units aI < IIa, IIb, III, IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -3.7, P < 0.0001); bIIa > I (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -4.4, P < 0.0001) and IIa < IIb, IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.7, P = 0.002); cIII < IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.1, P = 0.036) Results for PCR dI < IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.8, P < 0,002); eIIa < IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -3.1, P < 0.0001); fIIb < IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.2, P = 0.028); g III < IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.2, P = 0.024) Results for IFN-γ LSA hI > IIb, III, IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.1, P < 0.035) Results for IFN-γ ConA iI>IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.1, P = 0.036); jIIa > IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.7, P = 0.003); kIII > IV (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.5, P = 0.008) Abbreviations: LSA L. infantum soluble antigen, ConA concavalin A Summary of parameters based on IFN-γ producer versus IFN-γ non-producer dogs Statistical study was performed to compare IFN-γ producers versus non-IFN-γ producers. Letters a to d correspond to statistically significant differences Results for IFN-γ LSA, IFN-γa producers > non-IFN-γ producers (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -6.7, P < 0.0001) Results for IL-10 LSA, IFN-γb producers > non-IFN-γ producers (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -3.60, P < 0.0001) Results for PCR, IFN-γc producers< non-IFN-γ producers (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -3.2, P = 0.001) Results for ELISA units, IFN-γd producers< non-IFN-γ producers (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -3.2, P = 0.001) Abbreviations: LSA L. infantum soluble antigen IFN-γ producer dogs (mean ± SD: 5750 ± 14,082 EU) showed statistically significant lower levels of antibodies (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -3.23, P = 0.001) when compared with IFN-γ non-producer dogs (mean ± SD: 19,638 ± 28,596 EU) (Table 2).

Blood parasite load by real-time PCR

The results of blood parasitemia based on clinical staging and IFN-γ classification are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Blood PCR was positive in 40 dogs (66.6 %) out of 59 dogs. In addition, dogs classified with stage I and IIa group presented a tendency (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -1.53, P = 0.1) for lower blood parasitemia (5.3 ± 10.2 parasites/ml) than dogs classified with stages IIb, III or IV group (1255 ± 5464 parasites/ml). Interestingly, 14 IFN-γ producer dogs and five IFN-γ non-producers were negative by PCR at the time of diagnosis. Twenty-one (60 %) out of 35 IFN-γ producer dogs were positive by PCR at the time of diagnosis. Nineteen (76 %) out of 25 IFN-γ non-producer dogs were positive to PCR at the time of diagnosis. IFN-γ producer dogs presented a statistically significant lower parasitemia (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z =-3.22, P = 0.001) when compared with IFN-γ non-producers (Table 3).

IFN-γ

The results of ConA and L. infantum specific IFN-γ concentrations based on clinical staging and IFN-γ classification are shown in Tables 2 and 3. IFN-γ concentrations in supernatants of blood stimulated with LSA and ConA from all dogs studied were (mean ± SD) 1354 ± 3220 pg/ml and 6649 ± 6618 pg/ml, respectively. A significantly higher concentration of IFN-γ on ConA stimulated blood was found when compared with LSA stimulated blood (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: Z = -6.15, P <0.0001). Dogs classified with stage I and IIa group presented significantly higher (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.32, P = 0.02) LSA IFN-γ concentrations (mean±SD: 1939 ± 3952 pg/ml) than dogs classified with stages IIb, III or IV group (mean±SD: 411 ± 862 pg/ml) while no differences in ConA IFN-γ concentrations were observed among these two groups. IFN-γ producer dogs (n = 35) showed a significantly higher (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -6.78, P < 0.0001) LSA IFN-γ concentration (mean ± SD of 2320 ± 3961 pg/ml) when compared with IFN-γ non-producers (n = 25) (mean ± SD of 0 ± 0 pg/ml). The mean ± SD of ConA IFN-γ concentration from IFN-γ producer dogs was 7887 ± 7273 pg/ml while the mean ± SD of ConA IFN-γ concentration from IFN-γ non-producers was 4917 ± 5233 pg/ml. Statistical differences were found between IFN-γ producers and non-producers for IFN-γ concentration after stimulation with ConA (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -2.04, P = 0.041).

IL-10

The results of ConA and L. infantum specific IL-10 concentrations based on clinical staging and IFN-γ classification are shown in Tables 2 and 3. The mean ± SD of IL-10 concentrations in supernatants of blood stimulated with LSA and ConA from all dogs studied was 10 ± 15 pg/ml and 83 ± 102 pg/ml, respectively. A significantly higher concentration of IL-10 in ConA stimulated blood was found when compared with LSA stimulated blood (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: Z = -5.62, P < 0.0001). Moreover, 34 out of 53 dogs (64 %) did not produce IL-10 after LSA stimulation (0 pg/ml) while the rest of the dogs (n = 19; 36 %) produced significantly higher concentrations (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -6.46, P < 0.0001) of IL-10 (mean ± SD of 27.1 ± 13.3 pg/ml). Only four dogs did not produce IL-10 after ConA stimulation. Statistical analysis showed significantly higher concentrations of IL-10 in IFN-γ producer dogs after LSA stimulation when compared with IFN-γ non-producers (Mann-Whitney U-test: Z = -3.60, P < 0.0001). No significant differences in IL-10 concentrations were observed after ConA stimulation between IFN-γ producers and IFN-γ non-producers. Concentration of IL-10 from dogs classified with stages I and IIa group (10 ± 15 pg/ml) did not present significant differences when compared with dogs classified with stages IIb, III and IV group (10 ± 16 pg/ml). No differences in ConA IL-10 concentrations were observed between stage I and IIa group and stages IIb, III and IV group.

Correlation between parameters studied

The correlations among parameters studied are listed in Table 4.
Table 4

Correlation between IFN-γ concentration after LSA stimulation and the level of antibodies, blood parasitemia and cytokine production

Parameter (units)Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rS) P-value
L. infantum specific antibody levels (EU)-0.3910.002
Blood parasitemia (parasites/ml)-0.4130.001
IFN-γ concentration after ConA stimulation (pg/ml)0.3110.016
IL-10 concentration after LSA stimulation (pg/ml)0.585< 0.0001
IL-10 concentration after ConA stimulation (pg/ml)-0.810.562

Abbreviations: LSA L. infantum soluble antigen, ConA concavalin A

Correlation between IFN-γ concentration after LSA stimulation and the level of antibodies, blood parasitemia and cytokine production Abbreviations: LSA L. infantum soluble antigen, ConA concavalin A IFN-γ concentration after LSA stimulation was significantly negatively correlated with blood PCR and antibody levels as well as positively correlated with IFN-γ concentration after ConA stimulation and IL-10 concentration after LSA stimulation. No further significant correlations were found with IL-10 production.

Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated, for the first time, that dogs with several clinical stages of leishmaniosis presented differences in L. infantum specific cytokine profiles in stimulated blood. Interestingly, more than half of the dogs with clinical leishmaniosis showed a marked L. infantum specific IFN-γ production. Canine clinical leishmaniosis is classically characterized by a reduced or absent L. infantum specific T-cell mediated immunity [25]. In contrast, Leishmania-specific IFN-γ production in stimulated blood in dogs [26, 27] and other mammals such as rodents and humans have been associated with a resistant phenotype or with animals able to control infection [9]. However, more recent studies have already highlighted that T-cell mediated immunity might also be observed in dogs with clinical illness [28, 29] in agreement with the present results. It is also important to remark that the majority of dogs (58 %) that were L. infantum specific IFN-γ producers were also classified with the lower clinical stages and were mainly classified as having stage I or stage IIa [6]. Furthermore, significant higher L. infantum IFN-γ concentration was noted between stage I and IIa group and stage IIb, III and IV group. In addition, IFN-γ producer dogs presented lower antibody levels as well as lower blood parasitemia when compared with IFN-γ non-producers. Moreover, significant negative correlations were found between LSA IFN-γ concentration and antibody and blood parasitemia. Similar findings were observed in Brazil where pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α were highly expressed in the spleen of naturally infected dogs with low parasitism and these cytokines were negatively correlated with the parasite burden in the spleen [29]. An experimental canine model also demonstrated that splenic parasite burdens correlated negatively with Leishmania-specific IFN-γ and IL-2 levels, and negatively with leishmanin skin test reactivity [30]. In the present study, 42 % of the dogs were IFN-γ non-producers and these dogs were most likely to be classified in higher clinical stages (stage IIb, III and IV) and also had high specific positive antibody levels and blood parasitemia as previously described in other studies in dogs with severe clinical leishmaniosis [19, 31]. It has been previously demonstrated that as dogs progress to clinical leishmaniosis, they display impaired CD4+ T cell proliferation and IFN-γ production ex vivo in response to L. infantum antigen [19, 31]. However, the cellular basis and mechanisms for the development of antigen specific T-cell unresponsiveness in canine leishmaniosis are not fully understood. T cell exhaustion is well documented in chronic infections such as parasitic infections in several mammals. T cell exhaustion is defined as antigen-specific effector T cell dysfunction with sustained expression of inhibitory receptors, including programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and decreased effector cytokine production such as IFN-γ [32, 33]. Interestingly, T cell exhaustion was significantly associated with a four-fold increase in the population of T cells (both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells) with PD-1 in a study comparing healthy non-infected control and sick foxhounds dogs with clinical leishmaniosis [31]. This was in conjunction with an absent lymphocyte proliferation and decreased peripheral blood mononuclear cells ( PBMC) L. infantum specific IFN-γ production. These authors also demonstrated that PD-1 mediated exhaustion influenced macrophage-reactive oxygen intermediate production enabling the control of Leishmania infection [31]. We believe that T-cell exhaustion is probably the mechanism that explains L. infantum antigen T-cell unresponsiveness in our patients with moderate to very severe disease. Further studies should elucidate if PD-1 is diversely expressed in dogs in different clinical stages as the ones described in the present study. Furthermore, in this study we have demonstrated that there were significant differences in IFN-γ production after stimulation with ConA among clinical stages as well as between IFN-γ producer and non-producer dogs. In stage IV-very severe disease, the IFN-γ concentration after stimulation with ConA was significantly lower than in other less severe clinical stages (I, IIa and III) and the same tendency was noted with dogs in stage IIb. In addition, IFN-γ non-producer dogs showed significantly lower IFN-γ concentration after stimulation with ConA when compared with IFN-γ producer dogs. These findings demonstrate that dogs with very severe disease are in more T cell anergy than dogs with less severe clinical stages. This was previously demonstrated by means of mitogenic lymphocyte proliferation such as conA in dogs with clinical leishmaniosis [34, 35]. Interestingly, our findings of IL-10 are not in agreement with the majority of studies on human visceral leishmaniosis [36, 37] or other studies reported in dogs with clinical leishmaniosis where a low or absent IFN-γ production was found in tandem with increased production of IL-10 [19, 29]. An experimental canine model also demonstrated that splenic parasite burdens correlated positively with Leishmania-specific IL-10 levels [30]. Interestingly, a recent study carried out in Ethiopia in humans with visceral leishmaniosis due to L. donovani showed that Leishmania stimulated whole blood cells produce low or levels below the detection limit of IFN-γ and IL-10 [38] in agreement with the results of IFN-γ non-producer dogs of this study. In the present study, IFN-γ producer dogs secreted higher levels of IL-10 concentration after LSA stimulation when compared with IFN-γ non-producers. The reasons for these findings are difficult to explain but it could be because after LSA stimulation, IFN-γ non-producer dogs might be less responsive to other cytokines including IL-10. Another possibility could be that IL-10 is produced in IFN-γ producer dogs as a negative feedback to control proinflammatory cytokines as described in human mucocutaneous leishmaniosis [39]. IL-10 can counterbalance the proinflammatory effect of IFN-γ, leading to an adequate regulation of immune responses. In addition, it is important to remark that a high proportion of dogs did not produce IL-10 and that, in general, IL-10 concentration was extremely much lower than IFN-γ concentration. Moreover, IL-10 concentration after LSA stimulation was not associated with disease severity. Therefore, IL-10 does not appear to be a marker of disease severity. Suppressed cell-mediated immunity in clinical canine leishmaniosis as a result of the inability of PBMCs to respond to Leishmania antigen, is thought to underlie the progressive nature of this disease [9]. In the present study, we reported the ability of a whole blood IFN-γ release assay to detect dogs with clinical leishmaniosis with moderate to severe disease as previously reported in humans with visceral leishmaniosis due to L. donovani [40-43]. To date, there are few and poorly standardized assays to evaluate L. infantum specific T-cell mediated immunity responses in dogs [13] such as the leishmanin skin test [14, 15], lymphocyte proliferation assays [16, 17] and cytokine profiles in stimulated PBMC or blood from dogs [44, 45]. This type of L. infantum specific whole blood assay has been described before in Leishmania vaccinated dogs [44, 45]. However, to the best knowledge of the authors, this is the first time, that this whole blood assay has been performed in dogs with clinical leishmaniosis at different clinical stages. In human visceral leishmaniosis, whole blood assay that uses soluble Leishmania antigen have shown advantages over the leishmanin skin test, in terms of higher specificity and better correlation with surrogate markers of exposures to L. donovani [43]. Furthermore, in humans, CD4+ T cells were found to be crucial for and the main source of the IFN-γ production in Leishmania stimulated whole blood cultures [42] and we postulated that the same occurs in canines. We believe as described in human visceral leishmaniosis [43], that this assay is a promising tool to evaluate cellular immune responses in dogs in endemic areas. Research in this area is essential for the development of potential immunological and epidemiological tools for both canine and human leishmaniosis. Our findings confirmed that canine leishmaniosis manifests in a wide spectrum of clinical illness as well documented elsewhere in clinical cases [46], studies [47] and guidelines [6, 48]. The majority of dogs (60 %) were classified as LeishVet stage II (moderate disease) followed by stages I (16 %), III (16 %) and IV (6.6 %). In addition, stage IIa (45 %) was the most frequently diagnosed clinical stage in the present study. The present results gave a good picture of the current presentation of clinical canine leishmaniosis at least in the north-east of Spain in client-owned dogs based on clinical stages. Our findings are likely to be similar to those present in other Mediterranean countries such as Portugal, France or Italy. It is important to highlight that the majority of the dogs studied did not have evidence of renal disease and, therefore, they had a good prognosis if managed with anti-Leishmania treatment.

Conclusions

The results of this study demonstrate that sick dogs lacking L. infantum specific IFN-γ production in stimulated whole blood produce a strong humoral response, have a high blood parasitemia and severe clinical disease. In contrast, IL-10 does not appear to be a marker of disease severity. Pinpointing the precise immune responses associated with canine leishmaniosis will help to advance treatment and the development of a preventative strategy.

Abbreviations

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CBC, complete blood cell count; CD4, cluster of differentiation 4; ConA, concanavalin A; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; EU, ELISA units; IFN-γ, interferon-gamma; IL-10, interleukin-10; IL-2, interleukin-2; IL-4, interleukin-4; IL-5, interleukin-5; LSA, L. infantum soluble antigen; NO, nitric oxide; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; RPMI-1640, Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium; rt-PCR, real time PCR; TGFβ, transforming growth factor beta; Th1, type 1 T helper lymphocytes; Th2, type 2 T helper lymphocytes; TNFα, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; UPC, urinary protein/creatinine ratio.
  47 in total

1.  Interleukin-12 augments a Th1-type immune response manifested as lymphocyte proliferation and interferon gamma production in Leishmania infantum-infected dogs.

Authors:  Dalit Strauss-Ayali; Gad Baneth; Sharon Shor; Fumiyoshi Okano; Charles L Jaffe
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 3.981

Review 2.  Importance of worldwide asymptomatic carriers of Leishmania infantum (L. chagasi) in human.

Authors:  Grégory Michel; Christelle Pomares; Bernard Ferrua; Pierre Marty
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.112

Review 3.  Phenotypical characteristics, biochemical pathways, molecular targets and putative role of nitric oxide-mediated programmed cell death in Leishmania.

Authors:  P Holzmuller; R Bras-Gonçalves; J-L Lemesre
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  Early suppression of lymphoproliferative response in dogs with natural infection by Leishmania infantum.

Authors:  R De Luna; M L Vuotto; M T Ielpo; R Ambrosio; D Piantedosi; V Moscatiello; P Ciaramella; A Scalone; L Gradoni; D Mancino
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 2.046

5.  Detection of canine cytokine gene expression by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  E Pinelli; S Y van der Kaaij; R Slappendel; C Fragio; E J Ruitenberg; W Bernadina; V P Rutten
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  1999-08-02       Impact factor: 2.046

Review 6.  Cytokine profiles in canine visceral leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Eugenia Carrillo; Javier Moreno
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 2.046

Review 7.  Whole blood assay and visceral leishmaniasis: Challenges and promises.

Authors:  Om Prakash Singh; Shyam Sundar
Journal:  Immunobiology       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.144

Review 8.  T cell exhaustion in protozoan disease.

Authors:  Jason P Gigley; Rajarshi Bhadra; Magali M Moretto; Imtiaz A Khan
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2012-07-24

Review 9.  Canine leishmaniosis - new concepts and insights on an expanding zoonosis: part one.

Authors:  Gad Baneth; Alexander F Koutinas; Laia Solano-Gallego; Patrick Bourdeau; Lluis Ferrer
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2008-05-29

10.  Leishmania tropica in Stray Dogs in Southeast Iran.

Authors:  Mehdi Bamorovat; Iraj Sharifi; Shahriar Dabiri; Mohammad Ali Mohammadi; Majid Fasihi Harandi; Mehdi Mohebali; Mohammad Reza Aflatoonian; Alireza Keyhani
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.429

View more
  26 in total

1.  A new multi-epitope peptide vaccine induces immune responses and protection against Leishmania infantum in BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Bahareh Vakili; Navid Nezafat; Bijan Zare; Nasrollah Erfani; Maryam Akbari; Younes Ghasemi; Mohammad Reza Rahbar; Gholam Reza Hatam
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Exploring the relationship between susceptibility to canine leishmaniosis and anti-Phlebotomus perniciosus saliva antibodies in Ibizan hounds and dogs of other breeds in Mallorca, Spain.

Authors:  Alexis C Burnham; Laura Ordeix; M Magdalena Alcover; Pamela Martínez-Orellana; Sara Montserrat-Sangrà; Laura Willen; Tatiana Spitzova; Petr Volf; Laia Solano-Gallego
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 3.  The balancing act: Immunology of leishmaniosis.

Authors:  Angela J Toepp; Christine A Petersen
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.534

4.  Erratum to: Leishmania infantum-specific production of IFN-γ and IL-10 in stimulated blood from dogs with clinical leishmaniosis.

Authors:  Laia Solano-Gallego; Sara Montserrat-Sangrà; Laura Ordeix; Pamela Martínez-Orellana
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  New Vaccine Formulations Containing a Modified Version of the Amastigote 2 Antigen and the Non-Virulent Trypanosoma cruzi CL-14 Strain Are Highly Antigenic and Protective against Leishmania infantum Challenge.

Authors:  Ana Paula M M Almeida; Leopoldo F M Machado; Daniel Doro; Frederico C Nascimento; Leonardo Damasceno; Ricardo Tostes Gazzinelli; Ana Paula Fernandes; Caroline Junqueira
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Cytokine Effect of TLR3, TLR4, and TLR7 Agonists Alone or Associated with Leishmania infantum Antigen on Blood from Dogs.

Authors:  Pamela Martínez-Orellana; Sara Montserrat-Sangrà; Paulina Quirola-Amores; Noemí González; Laia Solano-Gallego
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Parasite Specific Antibody Levels, Interferon-γ and TLR2 and TLR4 Transcripts in Blood from Dogs with Different Clinical Stages of Leishmaniosis.

Authors:  Sara Montserrat-Sangrà; Laura Ordeix; Pamela Martínez-Orellana; Laia Solano-Gallego
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-16

8.  The inflammatory cytokine effect of Pam3CSK4 TLR2 agonist alone or in combination with Leishmania infantum antigen on ex-vivo whole blood from sick and resistant dogs.

Authors:  Pamela Martínez-Orellana; Paulina Quirola-Amores; Sara Montserrat-Sangrà; Laura Ordeix; Joan Llull; Alejandra Álvarez-Fernández; Laia Solano-Gallego
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Evaluation of four molecular methods to detect Leishmania infection in dogs.

Authors:  Andreia Albuquerque; Lenea Campino; Luís Cardoso; Sofia Cortes
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Does co-infection with vector-borne pathogens play a role in clinical canine leishmaniosis?

Authors:  Marta Baxarias; Alejandra Álvarez-Fernández; Pamela Martínez-Orellana; Sara Montserrat-Sangrà; Laura Ordeix; Alicia Rojas; Yaarit Nachum-Biala; Gad Baneth; Laia Solano-Gallego
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.