Joseph R Cohen1, Zachary W Adams2, Suvarna V Menon3, Eric A Youngstrom4, Brian E Bunnell5, Ron Acierno6, Kenneth J Ruggiero6, Carla Kmett Danielson2. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL, United States. Electronic address: cohenj@illinois.edu. 2. National Crime Victims Research and Treatment Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL, United States. 4. Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States. 5. College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States. 6. College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States; Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Administration Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study's aim was to provide the foundation for an efficient, empirically based protocol for depression screening following a natural disaster. Utilizing a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analytic approach, the study tested a) what specific disaster-related stressors (i.e., property damage, loss of basic services) and individual-related constructs (i.e., PTSD symptoms, trauma history, social support) conveyed the greatest risk for post-natural disaster depression, b) specific cutoff scores across these measures, and c) whether the significance or cutoff scores for each construct varied between adolescents and adults. METHODS: Structured phone-based clinical interviews were conducted with 2000 adolescents who lived through a tornado and 1543 adults who survived a hurricane. RESULTS: Findings suggested that in both adolescents and adults, individual-related constructs forecasted greater risk for depressive symptoms following a natural disaster compared to disaster-related stressors. Furthermore, trauma history and PTSD symptoms were particularly strong indicators for adolescent depressive symptoms compared to adult depressive symptoms. Adolescents and adults who reported vulnerable scores for social support, trauma history, and lifetime PTSD symptoms were approximately twice as likely to present as depressed following the natural disaster. LIMITATIONS: Findings from the present study were limited to post-disaster assessments and based on self-reported functioning 6-12 months following the natural disaster. CONCLUSIONS: The present study synthesizes the extensive body of research on post-disaster functioning by providing a clear framework for which questions may be most important to ask when screening for depression following a natural disaster.
BACKGROUND: The present study's aim was to provide the foundation for an efficient, empirically based protocol for depression screening following a natural disaster. Utilizing a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analytic approach, the study tested a) what specific disaster-related stressors (i.e., property damage, loss of basic services) and individual-related constructs (i.e., PTSD symptoms, trauma history, social support) conveyed the greatest risk for post-natural disaster depression, b) specific cutoff scores across these measures, and c) whether the significance or cutoff scores for each construct varied between adolescents and adults. METHODS: Structured phone-based clinical interviews were conducted with 2000 adolescents who lived through a tornado and 1543 adults who survived a hurricane. RESULTS: Findings suggested that in both adolescents and adults, individual-related constructs forecasted greater risk for depressive symptoms following a natural disaster compared to disaster-related stressors. Furthermore, trauma history and PTSD symptoms were particularly strong indicators for adolescent depressive symptoms compared to adult depressive symptoms. Adolescents and adults who reported vulnerable scores for social support, trauma history, and lifetime PTSD symptoms were approximately twice as likely to present as depressed following the natural disaster. LIMITATIONS: Findings from the present study were limited to post-disaster assessments and based on self-reported functioning 6-12 months following the natural disaster. CONCLUSIONS: The present study synthesizes the extensive body of research on post-disaster functioning by providing a clear framework for which questions may be most important to ask when screening for depression following a natural disaster.
Authors: Margaret S Pepe; Ziding Feng; Ying Huang; Gary Longton; Ross Prentice; Ian M Thompson; Yingye Zheng Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-11-02 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Elizabeth A Hahn; Darren A DeWalt; Rita K Bode; Sofia F Garcia; Robert F DeVellis; Helena Correia; David Cella Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: David N Sattler; Ana Maria Glower de Alvarado; Norma Blandon de Castro; Robert Van Male; A M Zetino; Raphael Vega Journal: J Trauma Stress Date: 2006-12
Authors: Warunee Thienkrua; Barbara Lopes Cardozo; M L Somchai Chakkraband; Thomas E Guadamuz; Wachira Pengjuntr; Prawate Tantipiwatanaskul; Suchada Sakornsatian; Suparat Ekassawin; Benjaporn Panyayong; Anchalee Varangrat; Jordan W Tappero; Merritt Schreiber; Frits van Griensven Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-08-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Meaghan L O'Donnell; Mark C Creamer; Ruth Parslow; Peter Elliott; Alexander C N Holmes; Steven Ellen; Rodney Judson; Alexander C McFarlane; Derrick Silove; Richard A Bryant Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2008-12
Authors: Jennifer L Barkin; Massimiliano Buoli; Carolann Lee Curry; Silke A von Esenwein; Saswati Upadhyay; Maggie Bridges Kearney; Katharine Mach Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Wanying Mao; Medard Adu; Ejemai Eboreime; Reham Shalaby; Nnamdi Nkire; Belinda Agyapong; Hannah Pazderka; Gloria Obuobi-Donkor; Ernest Owusu; Folajinmi Oluwasina; Yanbo Zhang; Vincent I O Agyapong Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 4.614