| Literature DB >> 27259049 |
Rikke K J Olsen1, Eliška Koňaříková2, Teresa A Giancaspero3, Signe Mosegaard4, Veronika Boczonadi5, Lavinija Mataković6, Alice Veauville-Merllié7, Caterina Terrile8, Thomas Schwarzmayr2, Tobias B Haack2, Mari Auranen9, Piero Leone3, Michele Galluccio10, Apolline Imbard11, Purificacion Gutierrez-Rios12, Johan Palmfeldt4, Elisabeth Graf8, Christine Vianey-Saban7, Marcus Oppenheim13, Manuel Schiff14, Samia Pichard15, Odile Rigal16, Angela Pyle5, Patrick F Chinnery17, Vassiliki Konstantopoulou18, Dorothea Möslinger18, René G Feichtinger6, Beril Talim19, Haluk Topaloglu20, Turgay Coskun21, Safak Gucer19, Annalisa Botta22, Elena Pegoraro23, Adriana Malena23, Lodovica Vergani23, Daniela Mazzà24, Marcella Zollino24, Daniele Ghezzi25, Cecile Acquaviva7, Tiina Tyni26, Avihu Boneh27, Thomas Meitinger2, Tim M Strom2, Niels Gregersen4, Johannes A Mayr6, Rita Horvath5, Maria Barile28, Holger Prokisch2.
Abstract
Multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiencies (MADDs) are a heterogeneous group of metabolic disorders with combined respiratory-chain deficiency and a neuromuscular phenotype. Despite recent advances in understanding the genetic basis of MADD, a number of cases remain unexplained. Here, we report clinically relevant variants in FLAD1, which encodes FAD synthase (FADS), as the cause of MADD and respiratory-chain dysfunction in nine individuals recruited from metabolic centers in six countries. In most individuals, we identified biallelic frameshift variants in the molybdopterin binding (MPTb) domain, located upstream of the FADS domain. Inasmuch as FADS is essential for cellular supply of FAD cofactors, the finding of biallelic frameshift variants was unexpected. Using RNA sequencing analysis combined with protein mass spectrometry, we discovered FLAD1 isoforms, which only encode the FADS domain. The existence of these isoforms might explain why affected individuals with biallelic FLAD1 frameshift variants still harbor substantial FADS activity. Another group of individuals with a milder phenotype responsive to riboflavin were shown to have single amino acid changes in the FADS domain. When produced in E. coli, these mutant FADS proteins resulted in impaired but detectable FADS activity; for one of the variant proteins, the addition of FAD significantly improved protein stability, arguing for a chaperone-like action similar to what has been reported in other riboflavin-responsive inborn errors of metabolism. In conclusion, our studies identify FLAD1 variants as a cause of potentially treatable inborn errors of metabolism manifesting with MADD and shed light on the mechanisms by which FADS ensures cellular FAD homeostasis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27259049 PMCID: PMC4908180 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.04.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Hum Genet ISSN: 0002-9297 Impact factor: 11.025
Figure 1FLAD1 Variants and Gene and Protein Structure
(A) Pedigrees of the investigated families (F1–F7) with recessively inherited FLAD1 variants. Affected individuals are indicated by closed symbols.
(B) Gene structure with exons and introns shows the localization of the investigated gene variations (homozygous variants are underlined). Met residues located upstream of the FADS domain are presented in yellow with their corresponding protein positions with respect to isoform 1 (GenBank: NM_025207.4). Isoforms 1 and 2 are reported in the UCSC Genome Browser as transcripts possessing an intact and active FADS domain. The protein structure highlights the MPTb domain in violet and the FADS domain in orange. Protein consequences of the identified FLAD1 mutations include the frameshift variants located in the MPTb domain and the two amino acid changes in a region of the FADS domain, which is highly conserved among eukaryotic species. Amino acid residues that are conserved across all species are highlighted in dark blue.
Rate of FAD Synthesis in Fibroblasts from Individuals with FLAD1 Variants
| C1 | 4.37 ± 0.61 |
| C2 | 4.36 ± 0.4 |
| C3 | 3.66 ± 0.38 |
| S1a | 2.05 ± 0.59∗∗ |
| S2 | 1.57 ± 0.7∗∗∗ |
| S4a | 1.04 ± 0.47∗∗∗ |
Data represent the mean ± SD of three to four independent cell lysates. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
FAD, FMN, and Riboflavin Quantification in Cellular and Mitochondrial Fibroblast Samples from Control and Affected Individuals
| Cellular flavin content (pmol/mg) | C1 | 111.7 ± 2.8 | 13.3 ± 1.4 | 2.6 ± 0.5 | 8.5 ± 0.7 |
| C2 | 171.2 ± 18.8 | 12.4 ± 0.3 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 13.8 ± 1.9 | |
| C3 | 105.8 ± 6.9 | 13.0 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 8.2 ± 0.5 | |
| S1a | 82.3 ± 8.6 | 11.7 ± 0.8 | 2.1 ± 0.8 | 7.0 ± 0.2 | |
| S2 | 84.3 ± 3.1 | 11.5 ± 0.6 | 2.4 ± 0.9 | 7.3 ± 0.1 | |
| S4a | 111.4 ± 6.6 | 15.8 ± 0.4 | 2.5 ± 0.5 | 7.0 ± 0.6 | |
| Mitochondrial flavin content (pmol/mg) | C1 | 2,093 | 3.0 ± 0.1 | NT | 697.7 ± 24.0 |
| C2 | 1,940 | 3.2 | NT | 606.3 | |
| C3 | 1,895 | 3.2 | NT | 592.2 | |
| S4a | 1,310 ± 70∗∗ | 2.0 ± 0.7 | NT | 655.0 ± 195.7 |
For cellular flavin content, data represent the mean ± SD of two independent cell lysates. NT, not tested. ∗∗p < 0.01.
Kinetic Properties of 6His-p.Ser495del, 6His-p.Arg530Cys, and WT FADS2
| Km FMN (μM) | 0.39 ± 0.07 | 0.98 ± 0.23∗∗∗ | 0.32 ± 0.10 |
| Km ATP (μM) | 4.63 ± 1.00∗ | 8.02 ± 2.23 | 8.10 ± 1.37 |
| Vmax (nmol·min−1·mg−1) | 7.9 ± 3.7∗∗∗ | 10.2 ± 1.6∗∗ | 43.3 ± 12.2 |
| Mg2+50 (mM) | 0.04 ± 0.02∗ | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
Data represent the mean ± SD of three experiments. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
Pre-treatment Genetic, Clinical, Biochemical, and Histopathological Findings in Individuals with FLAD1 Variants
| S1a | F | yes | c.[1484_1486delCCT]; [1484_1486delCCT] | p.[Ser495del];[Ser495del] | FADS | 32 hr | died at 3 days | NT | C5, C8, C14, C5-DC | ethylmalonic, adipic, suberic, and dehydrosebacic acids, hexanoylglycine | within control range | NR | vacuoles in muscle fibers (EM not done) |
| S1b | M | yes | c.[1484_1486delCCT]; [1484_1486delCCT] | p.[Ser495del];[Ser495del] | FADS | 3 months | alive at 22 years | yes | C4 | ethylmalonic and methylsuccinic acids | NR | NR | NR |
| S2 | F | no | c.[568_569dupGC]; [1588C>T] | p.[Val191Glnfs∗10]; [Arg530Cys] | MPTb (fs), FADS | 20 years | alive at 44 years | yes | C8, C10, C10:1 | ethylmalonic and glutaric acids, lactate | CII↓, CIII↓, CIV↓ | CS↑ | lipid-storage myopathy, faint COX staining |
| S3 | F | no | c.[836delT]; [1588C>T] | p.[Phe279Serfs∗45]; [Arg530Cys] | MPTb (fs), FADS | 44 years | alive at 56 years | yes | C5, C8, C10, C10:1, C14 | ethylmalonic acid, tiglylglycine | CI+III↓, CII+III↓ | CS↑ | lipid-storage myopathy, muscle beta oxidation (C4: 132%; C8: 15%; C16: 56%) |
| S4a | F | yes | c.[526_537delinsCA]; [526_537delinsCA] | p.[Ala176Glnfs∗8]; [Ala176Glnfs∗8] | MPTb (fs) | 4 months | alive at 8 years | yes | C4, C6, C8, C10, C14, C14:1, C14:2, C16:1, C18, C18:1, C18:2 | adipic, suberic, ethylmalonic, and methylsuccinic acids, ketosis | CI↓, CII↓ | PDH↓ | lipid-storage myopathy |
| S4b | F | yes | c.[526_537delinsCA]; [526_537delinsCA] | p.[Ala176Glnfs∗8]; [Ala176Glnfs∗8] | MPTb (fs) | 8 months | died at 16 years, 2 months | discontinued (side effects) | normal or C4-OH, C5, C6, C8, C10, C14:1, C16:1 | NR | NR | NR | NR |
| S5 | M | yes | c.[401_404delTTCT]; [401_404delTTCT] | p.[Phe134Cysfs∗8]; [Phe134Cysfs∗8] | MPTb (fs) | 6 months | died at 6 months | NT | C3, C5, C6, C8:1 | adipic acid | CI↓, CII+III↓ | CS↑ | lipid-storage myopathy, faint COX staining |
| S6 | F | no | c.[324delG]; [498delC;508T>C] | p.[Arg109Alafs∗3]; [Ser167Profs∗20; Phe170Leu] | MPTb (fs) | birth | died at 9 months | no | NR | NR | CI↓, CII+III↓ | CS↑ | lipid-storage myopathy, absent SDH staining, several NADH- and COX-negative fibers |
| S7 | F | yes | c.[401_404delTTCT]; [401_404delTTCT] | p.[Phe134Cysfs∗8]; [Phe134Cysfs∗8] | MPTb (fs) | 2 months | died at 4 months | NT | C4, C6, C8, C10, C10:1, C12, C14:1, C16, C16:1, C18:1 | ethylmalonic and glutaric acids | NR | NR | lipid-storage myopathy, faint SDH staining, normal COX |
Abbreviations are as follows: ↓, decrease; ↑, increase; C4, butyrylcarnitine; C4-OH, OH-butyrylcarnitine; C5, isovalerylcarnitine; C5-DC, glutarylcarnitine; C6, hexanoylcarnitine; C8, octanoylcarnitine; C10, decanoylcarnitine; C10:1, decenoylcarnitine; C12, dodecanoylcarnitine; C14, tetradecanoylcarnitine; C14:1, tetradecenoylcarnitine; C14:2, tetradecadienoylcarnitine; C16, hexadecanoylcarnitine; C16:1, hexadecenoylcarnitine; C18, octadecanoylcarnitine; C18:1, octadecenoylcarnitine; C18:2, octadecdienoylcarnitine; CI–CIV, complexes I–IV; COX, cytochrome c oxidase; CS, citrate synthase; EM, electron microscopy; F, female; FADS, FAD synthase domain; fs, frameshift; M, male; MPTb, molybdopterin binding domain; NR, not reported; NT, not tested; PDH, pyruvate dehydrogenase; and SDH, succinate dehydrogenase.
Actual values are reported in Table S3.
Actual values are reported in Table S5.
Figure 2Analysis of FADS Proteins
(A and B) Protein extract from cultured fibroblasts (A) or a liver biopsy (B) were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with polyclonal antibodies against the C-terminal end of the human FADS. Subjects (S1a, S2, S4a, and S5) and healthy control individuals (C1, C2, C3, and C) are indicated on top of the gels. Purified human FADS2 is indicated by “hF.” Trihalo staining or GAPDH were used as loading controls. The numbers (P1–P4) on the right side of the immunoblot in (A) correspond to FADS peptides detected by mass spectrometry (illustrated in C). Bands marked with an asterisk represent non-specific anti-FADS antibody bindings as defined by mass spectrometry.
(C) The amino acid sequence of human FADS1 (GenBank: NP_079483.3) is shown in one-letter symbols. The MPTb domain and the FADS domain are shaded in violet and orange, respectively, and the four Met residues upstream of the FADS domain are written in bold, and their protein positions are indicated. Peptides selected as identifiers of FADS and for use in the mass-spectrometry analysis are written in superscript and further listed below with their analysis number (P1–P5) and protein domain. The signal from peptide 5 was treated as a nonsignificant finding because it was detected at the boarder of the detection limit of the SRM analysis in all analyzed gel bands. The analysis was performed on gel bands processed from two independent cell lysates, and each peptide mixture was injected and analyzed by msass spectrometry twice.
Figure 3Alternative FLAD1 Transcripts and Their Predicted Products
(A) Analysis of transcriptome data for FLAD1 from two unrelated fibroblast control samples (C1 and C3) and one human blood sample (C2) revealed several possible transcripts, summarized as Sashimi plots (bottom). Schematic diagram shows isoform transcript structures with MPTb and FADS domains marked in violet and orange, respectively (top). The most abundant transcript (isoform 2) corresponds to the sequence reported in RefSeq (GenBank: NM_201398.2) but has an alternative intron in exon 1 and lacks the predicted MTS. Isoforms 5 and 6 represent transcripts without exons 1b and/or 2, where the identified FLAD1 frameshift variants are located, but both are able to express an active FADS domain. Isoform 5 can use the Met marked as M-X in the very beginning of the transcript, whereas isoform 6 utilizes Met268. In RNA from fibroblasts or blood, we did not identify a single transcript resulting in isoforms 1 (GenBank: NM_025207.4), 3 (GenBank: NM_00114891), or 4 (GenBank: NM_001184892) as reported in RefSeq. Isoforms 3 and 4 are not shown.
(B) PCR products of cDNA from control subjects and subject S4a confirmed the presence of non-degraded FLAD1 mRNA (all details are provided in Figure S1). The primer pair is able to amplify either isoform 2 or isoform 6 of the transcript, resulting in 307 or 84 bp products, respectively.
(C) Immunoblot analysis of the different FADS isoforms (Met98, Met268, and Met355) overproduced in fibroblasts derived from a healthy control individual shows their stability and detectability by anti-FADS antibody. A control fibroblast sample (C) is shown for comparison.
Figure 4Characterization of Recombinant 6His-p.Arg530Cys and 6His-p.Ser495del FADS2 Proteins
(A and B) The trypsin sensitivity (A) and degree of FAD saturation (B) of 6His-p.Ser495del FADS2 are reported in comparison with those of the same protein after reconstitution with a 2.5-fold molar excess of FAD. In (B), spectra of both 6His-p.Ser495del FADS2 purified in its apoform (0.58 mg/mL protein concentration, dashed line) and the reconstituted holoform (0.64 mg/mL protein concentration, black line) are reported.
(C and D) The trypsin sensitivity (C) and degree of FAD saturation (D) of 6His-p.Arg530Cys FADS2 are reported in comparison with those of WT FADS2. In (D), spectra of both 6His-p.Arg530Cys FADS2 (0.44 mg/mL protein concentration, straight line) and WT protein (0.5 mg/mL protein concentration, dashed line) are reported.
Trypsin sensitivity was analyzed by immunoblotting. The control represents protein treated under the same condition but in the absence of trypsin (−). The slower migration of the control band might reflect that the 6His tag is rapidly removed upon addition of trypsin. BSA was added to the loading buffer as an internal standard. In the graph, the time course of the limited proteolysis is reported as a percentage of the control amount (arbitrarily set to 100%). The degree of FAD saturation was estimated from the UV/Vis absorbance spectra.
Figure 5Kinetic Characterization of Recombinant 6His-p.Arg530Cys and 6His-p.Ser495del FADS2 Proteins
The dependence of FMN concentration on the rate of FAD synthesis catalyzed by WT (0.17 nmol), 6His-Arg530Cys (0.17 nmol), or 6His-Ser495del (0.18 nmol) FADS2. The FAD synthesis catalyzed by WT FADS2 is presented as open symbols. Mutant FADS is presented as closed symbols. The rate of FAD synthesis was measured in the presence of 100 μmol/L ATP and 5 mmol/L MgCl2. v0 was measured by the initial rate of fluorescence decrease (excitation at 450 nm and emission at 520 nm) and expressed in nmol FMN · min−1 · mg−1 mutant FADS2 (A) and as a percentage of the Vmax value (set arbitrarily to 100%) (B). Data points are fitted according to the Michaelis-Menten equation.