Literature DB >> 27258990

Evaluation of motion-correction methods for dual-gated cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.

Riku Klén1, Tommi Noponen, Juha Koikkalainen, Jyrki Lötjönen, Kris Thielemans, Erika Hoppela, Hannu Sipilä, Mika Teräs, Juhani Knuuti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dual gating is a method of dividing the data of a cardiac PET scan into smaller bins according to the respiratory motion and the ECG of the patient. It reduces the undesirable motion artefacts in images, but produces several images for interpretation and decreases the quality of single images. By using motion-correction techniques, the motion artefacts in the dual-gated images can be corrected and the images can be combined into a single motion-free image with good statistics. AIM: The aim of the present study is to develop and evaluate motion-correction methods for cardiac PET studies. We have developed and compared two different methods: computed tomography (CT)/PET-based and CT-only methods.
METHODS: The methods were implemented and tested with a cardiac phantom and three patient datasets. In both methods, anatomical information of CT images is used to create models for the cardiac motion.
RESULTS: In the patient study, the CT-only method reduced motion (measured as the centre of mass of the myocardium) on average 43%, increased the contrast-to-noise ratio on average 6.0% and reduced the target size on average 10%. Slightly better figures (51, 6.9 and 28%) were obtained with the CT/PET-based method. Even better results were obtained in the phantom study for both the CT-only method (57, 68 and 43%) and the CT/PET-based method (61, 74 and 52%).
CONCLUSION: We conclude that using anatomical information of CT for motion correction of cardiac PET images, both respiratory and pulsatile motions can be corrected with good accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27258990     DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  2 in total

Review 1.  Updates on Stress Imaging Testing and Myocardial Viability With Advanced Imaging Modalities.

Authors:  Sandeep S Hedgire; Michael Osborne; Daniel J Verdini; Brian B Ghoshhajra
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-04

2.  Estimation of optimal number of gates in dual gated 18F-FDG cardiac PET.

Authors:  R Klén; J Teuho; T Noponen; K Thielemans; E Hoppela; E Lehtonen; H T Sipila; M Teräs; J Knuuti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.