Jaeyoun Cheong1,2, Joseph A Galanko1, Sumant Arora3, Joaquin Cabezas1,4, Nambi J Ndugga1, Michael R Lucey5, Paul H Hayashi1, Alfred Sidney Barritt1, Ramon Bataller1. 1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. 2. Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Montgomery, AL, USA. 4. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain. 5. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pretransplant renal failure is commonly reported to be a poor prognostic indicator affecting survival after liver transplantation (LT). However, whether the impact of renal failure on patient outcome varies according to the aetiology of the underlying liver disease is largely unknown. METHODS: We investigated the association between renal failure at the time of LT and patient outcome in patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) (n = 6920), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (n = 2956) and hepatitis C (HCV) (n = 14 922) using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database between February 2002 and December 2013. A total of 24 798 transplant recipients were included. RESULTS: The presence of renal failure was more frequently seen in patients with ALD (23.95%) and NASH (23.27%) compared to patients with HCV (19.38%) (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, renal failure was an independent predictor of poor survival. Renal failure showed detrimental effect on patient survival in the overall series (HR = 1.466, P < 0.0001). Importantly, the impact of renal failure was less marked in patients with ALD (HR = 1.31, P < 0.0001) than in patients with NASH (HR = 1.73, P < 0.0001) or HCV (HR = 1.52, P < 0.0001). Despite a higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score at the time of LT, ALD patients with renal failure had better long-term prognosis than non-ALD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Renal failure at the time of LT conferred a lower patient and graft survival post-LT. However, renal failure has less impact on the outcome of patients with ALD than that of patients with non-alcoholic liver disease after LT.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pretransplant renal failure is commonly reported to be a poor prognostic indicator affecting survival after liver transplantation (LT). However, whether the impact of renal failure on patient outcome varies according to the aetiology of the underlying liver disease is largely unknown. METHODS: We investigated the association between renal failure at the time of LT and patient outcome in patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) (n = 6920), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (n = 2956) and hepatitis C (HCV) (n = 14 922) using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database between February 2002 and December 2013. A total of 24 798 transplant recipients were included. RESULTS: The presence of renal failure was more frequently seen in patients with ALD (23.95%) and NASH (23.27%) compared to patients with HCV (19.38%) (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, renal failure was an independent predictor of poor survival. Renal failure showed detrimental effect on patient survival in the overall series (HR = 1.466, P < 0.0001). Importantly, the impact of renal failure was less marked in patients with ALD (HR = 1.31, P < 0.0001) than in patients with NASH (HR = 1.73, P < 0.0001) or HCV (HR = 1.52, P < 0.0001). Despite a higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score at the time of LT, ALDpatients with renal failure had better long-term prognosis than non-ALDpatients. CONCLUSIONS:Renal failure at the time of LT conferred a lower patient and graft survival post-LT. However, renal failure has less impact on the outcome of patients with ALD than that of patients with non-alcoholic liver disease after LT.
Authors: Robert J Wong; Christina Chou; Clark A Bonham; Waldo Concepcion; Carlos O Esquivel; Aijaz Ahmed Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2014-04-19 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Lisa B VanWagner; Brittany Lapin; Anton I Skaro; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Mary E Rinella Journal: Liver Int Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Robert J Wong; Maria Aguilar; Ramsey Cheung; Ryan B Perumpail; Stephen A Harrison; Zobair M Younossi; Aijaz Ahmed Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Manish G Amin; Michael P Wolf; John A TenBrook; Richard B Freeman; Steve J Cheng; Daniel S Pratt; John B Wong Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Yousri M Barri; Edmund Q Sanchez; Linda W Jennings; Larry B Melton; Steven Hays; Marlon F Levy; Goran B Klintmalm Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Giovanni Musso; Roberto Gambino; James H Tabibian; Mattias Ekstedt; Stergios Kechagias; Masahide Hamaguchi; Rolf Hultcrantz; Hannes Hagström; Seung Kew Yoon; Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya; Jacob George; Francisco Barrera; Svanhildur Hafliðadóttir; Einar Stefan Björnsson; Matthew J Armstrong; Laurence J Hopkins; Xin Gao; Sven Francque; An Verrijken; Yusuf Yilmaz; Keith D Lindor; Michael Charlton; Robin Haring; Markus M Lerch; Rainer Rettig; Henry Völzke; Seungho Ryu; Guolin Li; Linda L Wong; Mariana Machado; Helena Cortez-Pinto; Kohichiroh Yasui; Maurizio Cassader Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 11.069