OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the role of split liver transplantation (SLT) in a combined pediatric and adult liver transplant center. The secondary aim is to reflect on our clinical practice and discuss strategies to build a successful split program using an "intention to split policy." BACKGROUND: SLT is an established procedure to expand the organ pool and reduce wait list mortality; however, technical and logistic issues are limiting factors. METHODS: Prospectively collected data and outcomes of SLT procedures performed between November 1992 and March 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. To assess the effect of standardization and learning curve, the experience was divided into 2 time periods. RESULTS: Out of 3449 liver transplant procedures performed, 516(15%) were SLT. The recipients included 266 children (290 grafts; 56%) and 212 adults (226 grafts; 44%). The median donor age was 25(7-63 years) and the median weight was 70(22-111 kg). The cold and warm ischemic times improved significantly during the second period (SP) (2001-2014). With experience, there was a significant reduction in the biliary complications for both grafts. The introduction of "intention to split policy" resulted in a significantly increased usage of SLT. There was no mortality on the pediatric wait list for last 4 years. Over the last decade 65% of our pediatric transplants were SLT. The overall 1-, 5-, 10-year patient and graft survival of left graft recipients was 91%, 90%, and 89% and 90%, 87%, and 86%. For right grafts it was 87%, 82%, and 81% and 82%, 81%, and 79%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SLT is an effective surgical strategy to meet the demands in a combined adult and pediatric transplant center. Good outcomes can be achieved with a standardized technique.
OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the role of split liver transplantation (SLT) in a combined pediatric and adult liver transplant center. The secondary aim is to reflect on our clinical practice and discuss strategies to build a successful split program using an "intention to split policy." BACKGROUND: SLT is an established procedure to expand the organ pool and reduce wait list mortality; however, technical and logistic issues are limiting factors. METHODS: Prospectively collected data and outcomes of SLT procedures performed between November 1992 and March 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. To assess the effect of standardization and learning curve, the experience was divided into 2 time periods. RESULTS: Out of 3449 liver transplant procedures performed, 516(15%) were SLT. The recipients included 266 children (290 grafts; 56%) and 212 adults (226 grafts; 44%). The median donor age was 25(7-63 years) and the median weight was 70(22-111 kg). The cold and warm ischemic times improved significantly during the second period (SP) (2001-2014). With experience, there was a significant reduction in the biliary complications for both grafts. The introduction of "intention to split policy" resulted in a significantly increased usage of SLT. There was no mortality on the pediatric wait list for last 4 years. Over the last decade 65% of our pediatric transplants were SLT. The overall 1-, 5-, 10-year patient and graft survival of left graft recipients was 91%, 90%, and 89% and 90%, 87%, and 86%. For right grafts it was 87%, 82%, and 81% and 82%, 81%, and 79%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SLT is an effective surgical strategy to meet the demands in a combined adult and pediatric transplant center. Good outcomes can be achieved with a standardized technique.
Authors: Douglas B Mogul; Xun Luo; Mary G Bowring; Eric K Chow; Allan B Massie; Kathleen B Schwarz; Andrew M Cameron; John F P Bridges; Dorry L Segev Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Jin Ge; Emily R Perito; John Bucuvalas; Richard Gilroy; Evelyn K Hsu; John P Roberts; Jennifer C Lai Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Jean de Ville de Goyet; Toni Illhardt; Christophe Chardot; Peace N Dike; Ulrich Baumann; Katherine Brandt; Barbara E Wildhaber; Mikko Pakarinen; Fabrizio di Francesco; Ekkehard Sturm; Marianna Cornet; Caroline Lemoine; Eva Doreen Pfister; Ana M Calinescu; Maria Hukkinen; Sanjiv Harpavat; Fabio Tuzzolino; Riccardo Superina Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Andres Fraile; Luis M Mercado; Hugo Paladini; Diego A Ramisch; Valeria Descalzi; Silvina Yantorno; Pablo A Farinelli; Pablo Barros Schelotto; Gabriel E Gondolesi Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2020-12-15
Authors: Daniel Azoulay; Cyrille Feray; Chetana Lim; Chady Salloum; Maria Conticchio; Daniel Cherqui; Antonio Sa Cunha; René Adam; Eric Vibert; Didier Samuel; Marc Antoine Allard; Nicolas Golse Journal: JHEP Rep Date: 2022-02-12
Authors: Dimitri Sneiders; Anne-Baue R M van Dijk; Wojciech G Polak; Darius F Mirza; M Thamara P R Perera; Hermien Hartog Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 3.842