| Literature DB >> 27257619 |
Michael Gray1, Jorge Golowasch2.
Abstract
The neuromodulatory inward current (IMI) generated by crab Cancer borealis stomatogastric ganglion neurons is an inward current whose voltage dependence has been shown to be crucial in the activation of oscillatory activity of the pyloric network of this system. It has been previously shown that IMI loses its voltage dependence in conditions of low extracellular calcium, but that this effect appears to be regulated by intracellular calmodulin. Voltage dependence is only rarely regulated by intracellular signaling mechanisms. Here we address the hypothesis that the voltage dependence of IMI is mediated by intracellular signaling pathways activated by extracellular calcium. We demonstrate that calmodulin inhibitors and a ryanodine antagonist can reduce IMI voltage dependence in normal Ca(2+), but that, in conditions of low Ca(2+), calmodulin activators do not restore IMI voltage dependence. Further, we show evidence that CaMKII alters IMI voltage dependence. These results suggest that calmodulin is necessary but not sufficient for IMI voltage dependence. We therefore hypothesize that the Ca(2+)/calmodulin requirement for IMI voltage dependence is due to an active sensing of extracellular calcium by a GPCR family calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) and that the reduction in IMI voltage dependence by a calmodulin inhibitor is due to CaSR endocytosis. Supporting this, preincubation with an endocytosis inhibitor prevented W7 (N-(6-aminohexyl)-5-chloro-1-naphthalenesulfonamide hydrochloride)-induced loss of IMI voltage dependence, and a CaSR antagonist reduced IMI voltage dependence. Additionally, myosin light chain kinase, which is known to act downstream of the CaSR, seems to play a role in regulating IMI voltage dependence. Finally, a Gβγ-subunit inhibitor also affects IMI voltage dependence, in support of the hypothesis that this process is regulated by a G-protein-coupled CaSR.Entities:
Keywords: activity; calcium sensing receptor; calcium-dependence; central pattern generation; crustacean; stomatogastric
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27257619 PMCID: PMC4874538 DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0038-16.2016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: eNeuro ISSN: 2373-2822
Figure 1.Modulator-activated IMI measurement and quantification. , Proctolin (1 μm)-induced IMI in LP neuron. Top, Voltage ramp protocol. Middle, Current in control ramp (black trace) and at the peak of the response to proctolin (red trace). Bottom, Difference current (blue trace) obtained by subtracting control currents from currents measured in proctolin. Only currents evoked during descending voltage ramps were considered (blue trace). , I–V curves of IMI in normal saline solution (13 mm CaCl2, black trace) and low-calcium saline solution (2 mm CaCl2, blue trace). Changes in slope between −75 and −20 mV are used as a measure of IMI voltage dependence. Amplitude at −15 mV is taken as a measure of IMI activation. Note that IMI in normal saline solution is close to maximal at this voltage, and there is minimal difference between normal calcium and low-calcium conditions.
Effect of proctolin application sequence on maximum amplitude and slope in normal calcium saline solution
| Application 1 | Application 2 | Application 3 | Application 4 | Application 5 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ampl (nA) | Slope (nS) | Ampl (nA) | Slope (nS) | Ampl (nA) | Slope (nS) | Ampl (nA) | Slope (nS) | Ampl (nA) | Slope (nS) |
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( |
| −2.8 ± 0.6* | −41 ± 10 | −1.3 ± 0.3 | −17 ± 4 | −1.5 ± 0.3 | −17 ± 5 | −1.1 ± 0.3 | −12 ± 3 | −1.0 ± 0.3 | −12 ± 6 |
All data were obtained from LP neurons. Ampl, Amplitude.
*Tukey’s test, p < 0.05 vs application 2.
Effect of proctolin application sequence on maximum amplitude and slope in low-calcium saline solution
| Application 2 | Application 3 | Application 4 | Application 5 | Application 6 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ampl (nA) | Slope (nS) | Ampl (nA) | Slope (nS) | Ampl (nA) | Slope (nS) | Ampl (nA) | Slope (nS) | Ampl (nA) | Slope (nS) |
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( |
| −2.1 ± 0.9 | +26 ± 10 | −1.6 ± 0.7 | +23 ± 11 | −1.1 ± 0.6* | +19 ± 5 | −0.8 ± 0.6** | +22 ± 6 | −0.7 ± 0.5** | +18±6 |
Data are reported as the mean ± SEM. First application was not included as it was performed in normal calcium conditions. All data obtained from LP neurons. Ampl, Amplitude.
*Tukey’s test, p < 0.05 vs application 2 of same calcium condition. **Tukey test’s, p < 0.01 vs application 2 of same calcium condition.
Statistical tests
| Letter, experiment name | Data structure (distribution) | Type of test | Power (α = 0.05) |
|---|---|---|---|
| a Low-calcium effect on RMP | Normal | Two-tailed paired | 1.00 |
| b Low-calcium effect on Rin | Normal | Two-tailed paired | 0.84 |
| c BSA effect on low calcium-induced depolarization | Normal | Two-tailed | 1.00 |
| d BSA effect on low calcium-induced effects of Rin | Non-normal | Mann–Whitney rank sum test | 0.17* |
| e Effect of low calcium on IMI amplitude | Normal | One-way ANOVA | 0.30 |
| f Effect of application number on IMI amplitude in normal calcium | Normal | One-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | 0.81 |
| g Effect of application number on slope in normal calcium | Normal | One-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | 0.81 |
| h Effect of application number on IMI amplitude in low calcium | Normal | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | Calcium = 0.05Application = 0.90Interaction = 0.59 |
| i Effect of application number on slope in low calcium | Normal | Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | Calcium = 0.94Application = 0.05Interaction = 0.13 |
| j W7 effect on proctolin-induced IMI slope | Normal | One-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | 1.00 |
| k W7 effect on proctolin-induced IMI amplitude | Normal | One-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | 0.54 |
| l W7 effect on CCAP-induced IMI slope | Normal | Two-tailed paired t test | 0.50 |
| m W7 effect on CCAP-induced IMI amplitude | Normal | Two-tailed paired t test | 0.05 |
| n Effect of calmidazolium on proctolin-induced IMI slope | Normal | One-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | 0.62 |
| o Effect of calmidazolium effect on proctolin-induced IMI amplitude | Normal | One-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | 0.78 |
| p Effect of CALP1 (2 h) on proctolin-induced IMI slope | Normal | One-way ANOVA | 0.07 |
| q Effect of CALP1 (2 h) on proctolin-induced IMI amplitude | Normal | One-way ANOVA | 0.05 |
| r Effect of CALP1 (overnight) on proctolin-induced IMI slope | Normal | Two-tailed t test | 0.10 |
| s Effect of CALP1 (overnight) on proctolin-induced IMI amplitude | Normal | Two-tailed t test | 0.10 |
| t Dantrolene effect on proctolin-induced IMI slope | Normal | Two-tailed paired t test | 0.91 |
| u Dantrolene effect on proctolin-induced IMI amplitude | Normal | Two-tailed paired t test | 0.77 |
| w KN-93 effect on proctolin-induced IMI slope | Normal | One-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | 1.00 |
| x KN-93 effect on proctolin-induced IMI amplitude | Normal | One-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | 1.00 |
| y Effect of gallein on proctolin-induced IMI slope | Normal | One-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | 0.56 |
| z Effect of gallein on proctolin-induced IMI amplitude | Normal | One-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | 0.13 |
| aa Effect of NPS-2143 on proctolin-induced IMI slope | Normal | One-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | 0.57 |
| ab Effect of NPS-2143 on proctolin-induced IMI amplitude | Normal | One-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | 0.06 |
| ac ML7 effect on proctolin-induced IMI slope | Normal | One-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | 0.95 |
| ad ML7 effect on proctolin-induced IMI amplitude | Normal | One-way repeated-measures ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | 0.71 |
| ae Effect of dynasore on W7’s reduction of IMI voltage dependence | Normal | Two-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | W7 = 0.99Dynasore = 0.55Interaction = 0.26 |
| af Effect of dynasore on effect of W7 on IMI amplitude | Normal | Two-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | W7 = 0.88Dynasore = 0.10Interaction = 0.17 |
| ag R568 effect on proctolin-induced IMI slope | Normal | Two-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | Calcium = 0.86R568 = 0.89Interaction = 0.10 |
| ah R568 effect on proctolin-induced IMI amplitude | Non-normal | Two-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s tests | Calcium = 1.00R568 = 1.00Interaction = 0.70 |
All data obtained from LP neurons. RMP is resting membrane potential, Rin is input resistance.
*Post hoc power calculation performed for t test.
Figure 2.The effect of calmodulin inhibitors on IMI voltage dependence. Left, Proctolin-induced IMI at different concentrations of W7. , Representative I–V curves of a W7 experiment. , Averaged I–V curves across W7 experiments. , Quantification of W7 data. A one-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed that W7 changed the proctolin-induced IMI slope (F(4,19) = 15.972, p = 6.96 × 10−6j). Error bars indicate the SEM. Tukey’s test; *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001. Right, Proctolin-induced IMI in different concentrations of calmidazolium (CDZ). , Representative I–V curves. , Average I–V curves from all calmidazolium experiments. , Quantification of all calmidazolium data. A one-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed that calmidazolium significantly altered IMI slope (F(3,9) = 4.846, p = 0.028n). However, no significant post hoc pairwise differences were observed. Tukey’s post hoc test, p < 0.05. Error bars indicate the SEM. Data are from LP neurons.
Figure 8.The endocytosis inhibitor dynasore prevents W7-induced increases in IMI slope in LP neurons. CCAP-induced IMI was measured before (black) and after exposure to the following: 33 µm W7 for 45-65 min (red); dynasore for 45-80 min (blue); 20 min in 33 µm dynasore, then 45-60 min in 33 µm dynasore plus 33 µm W7 (green). , Representative I–V curves of W7 effect (top) and dynasore effect (bottom). , Average I–V curves of all experiments. , Average slope of CCAP-induced IMI from data in and two-way ANOVA for the effects of factors dynasore and W7 on slope (W7: F(1,32) = 14.934, p = 5.12 × 10−4; dynasore: F(1,32) = 4.317, p = 0.046; Interaction: F(1,32) = 2.109, p = 0.156ae). Post hoc Tukey’s comparisons on slope: (1) W7 only vs control (p < 0.001); (2) dynasore only vs control (p = 0.624); (3) dynasore only vs dynasore plus W7 (p = 0.129); and (4) W7 only vs W7 plus dynasore (p = 0.03). Post hoc Tukey’s test: *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.
Drugs that affected IMI slope
| Drug name | [Drug] | [Ca] | Neuromodulator | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W7 | 0 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 12 | −21.7 ± 3.7 |
| 0.1 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 5 | −13.5 ± 4.2 | |
| 1 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 6 | −11.2 ± 2.4* | |
| 10 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 6 | −11.4 ± 3.9** | |
| 100 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 6 | +13.1 ± 3.4*** | |
| Calmidazolium | 0 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 6 | −20.4 ± 10.6 |
| 0.1 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 2 | −13.7 ± 11.1 | |
| 0.3 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 6 | +1.6 ± 14 | |
| 0.0 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 4 | +4.3 ± 4.9 | |
| Dantrolene | 0 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 6 | −8.1 ± 3.2 |
| 3.3 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 6 | +1.6 ± 1.9** | |
| CALP1 | 0 µ | 2 m | Proctolin | 11 | +18.2 ± 4.9 |
| 1 µ | 2 m | Proctolin | 4 | +10.2 ± 6.4 | |
| 10 µ | 2 m | Proctolin | 4 | +28.2 ± 3.8 | |
| 50 µ | 2 m | Proctolin | 2 | +23.5 ± 9.4 | |
| KN-93 | 0 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 7 | −21 ± 4.2 |
| Low dose | 13 m | Proctolin | 5 | +0.8 ± 5.8 | |
| High dose | 13 m | Proctolin | 2 | +16.6 ± 2.2 | |
| Pertussis toxin | 0 µg/ml | 13 m | Proctolin | 7 | −3.1 ± 2.9 |
| 0 µg/ml | 2 m | Proctolin | 6 | +14.4 ± 3.1 | |
| 10 µg/ml | 13 m | Proctolin | 7 | +1.5 ± 2.9 | |
| 10 µg/ml | 2 m | Proctolin | 6 | +21.5 ± 3.1 | |
| GTPγS | 0 m | 13 m | Proctolin | 9 | −2.2 ± 2.9 |
| 0 m | 2 m | Proctolin | 8 | +11.5 ± 3.1 | |
| 10 m | 13 m | Proctolin | 5 | −6.7 ± 4.0 | |
| 10 m | 2 m | Proctolin | 4 | +15.2 ± 4.4 | |
| Gallein | 0 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 9 | −5.4 ± 1.6 |
| 1 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 9 | +1.5 ± 1.9* | |
| 3 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 9 | +0.7 ± 2.8 | |
| ML-7 | 0 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 12 | −4.2 ± 1.5 |
| 0.1 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 12 | +1.7 ± 2.3* | |
| 1 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 10 | +4.5 ± 1.4*** | |
| 10 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 7 | +3.1 ± 2.4* | |
| Dynasore, W7 | 0, 0 µ | 13 m | CCAP | 18 | −11.3 ± 1.3 |
| 0, 33 µ | 13 m | CCAP | 6 | −0.4 ± 2.3*** | |
| 33, 0 µ | 13 m | CCAP | 6 | −12.6 ± 2.3 | |
| 33, 33 µ | 13 m | CCAP | 6 | −7.7 ± 2.3† | |
| R568 | 0 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 10 | −0.7 ± 4.5 |
| 0 µ | 2 m | Proctolin | 6 | +16.5 ± 5.9 | |
| 10 µ | 13 m | Proctolin | 4 | +17.3 ± 7.2* | |
| 10 µ | 2 m | Proctolin | 4 | +36.9 ± 7.2‡ |
Data are reported as the mean ± SEM. All data were obtained from LP neurons.
Tukey’s test/t test p value vs control: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; †p < 0.05 vs W7 alone; ‡p < 0.05 vs low-calcium control.
Figure 3.The ryanodine antagonist dantrolene reduces IMI voltage dependence. , Representative I–V curve of the proctolin-induced IMI before (black trace) and after (red trace) application of 3.33 μm dantrolene. , Averaged I–V curves of all dantrolene experiments. , Quantification of dantrolene data shown in . A paired two-tailed Student’s t test showed that dantrolene significantly increased proctolin-induced IMI slope (t(5) = −4.230, p = 0.008t). *p < 0.05. Error bars indicate the SEM. Recordings are from LP neurons.
Figure 4.The CaMKII inhibitor KN-93 reduces IMI voltage dependence. Proctolin-induced IMI at different concentrations of KN-93. For statistical analysis, KN-93 was grouped into a low-dose (2-5 μm) and a high-dose (10-20 μm) group, in addition to a control group (0 μm). , Representative I–V curves for a KN-93 experiment. , Averaged I–V curves for all KN-93 experiments. , Quantification of data shown in . A one-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed that KN-93 significantly increased proctolin-induced IMI slope (F(2,5) = 46.239, p = 5.96 × 10−4w). Recordings are from LP neurons.
Figure 10.A model for CaSR-mediated regulation of IMI voltage dependence. According to this model, IMI channels are activated by a neuropeptide receptor using a pathway (not shown here) independent from the depicted voltage dependence pathway. The voltage dependence of IMI is regulated by G-protein-coupled CaSRs. Calmodulin (CaM) stabilizes the receptor on the membrane, and inhibitors of calmodulin lead to CaSR endocytosis. Green boxes and blunt-ended lines show agents that inhibit the indicated paths. Arrows indicate activating pathways. Intracellular calcium release via ryanodine receptors is part of the source for calmodulin activation, and both CaMKII and MLCK inhibit voltage dependence.
Figure 5.The Gβγ-subunit inhibitor gallein increases IMI slope. , Representative I–V curves of proctolin-induced IMI in gallein. , Averaged I–V curves of proctolin-induced IMI for all gallein experiments. , Quantification of the data shown in . , A one-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed that gallein significantly increased proctolin-induced IMI slope (F(2,16) = 4.445, p = 0.029y). Error bars indicate the SEM. Tukey’s test, *p < 0.05. Recordings are from LP neurons.
Figure 6.The specific CaSR antagonist NPS-2143 increases IMI slope in a normal calcium condition in LP neurons. , Representative I–V curves showing the effect of NPS-2143 (NPS) at different concentrations on proctolin-induced IMI. , Averaged I–V curves of all NPS-2143 experiments. , Quantification of all NPS-2143 data. A one-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed that NPS-2143 significantly altered proctolin-induced IMI slope (F(4,22) = 3.314, p = 0.029aa). Error bars indicate the SEM. Tukey’s test, *p < 0.05.
Figure 7.The MLCK inhibitor ML-7 reduces the voltage dependence of IMI in LP neurons. , Representative I–V traces of proctolin-induced IMI in the presence of various concentrations of ML-7. , Averaged I–V traces for all ML-7 experiments. , A one-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed that ML-7 increased proctolin-induced IMI slope (F(3,26) = 7.503, p = 8.92 × 10−4ac). Error bars indicate the SEM. Tukey’s test: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 9.The CaSR agonist R568 increases proctolin-induced IMI slope in LP neurons. Proctolin-induced IMI was measured in the presence (red) or absence (black) of 10 µm CaSR agonist R568 in either 13 mm CaCl2 (solid) or 2 mm CaCl2 (striped). , Left, Representative I–V curves of proctolin-induced IMI in 13 mm CaCl2 (black solid), 2 mm CaCl2 (black dotted), and 13 mm CaCl2 (green solid) after a 1 h wash. Right, Representative I–V curves of proctolin-induced IMI in the presence of 10 µm CaSR agonist R568 in normal (13 mm) calcium (red solid), low (2 mm) calcium (red dotted), and then in normal calcium after 1 h wash from R568 (green solid). , Left, Averaged I–V traces of all proctolin-induced IMI experiments in normal calcium in the presence (red solid) or absence (black solid) of 10 µm R568. Right, Averaged I–V traces of all proctolin-induced IMI experiments in a low-calcium condition in the presence (red dotted) or absence (black dotted) of 10 µm R568. , Quantification of IMI slope. Two-way ANOVA for factors R568 and calcium showing significant changes in proctolin-induced IMI slope (calcium: F(1,20) = 8.560, p = 0.008; R568: F(1,20) = 9.295, p = 0.006; interaction: F(1,20) = 0.0324, p = 0.859ag). Error bars indicate the SEM. Tukey’s test: *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001.