| Literature DB >> 27257553 |
Alexandre Soares Dos Santos1, Nei Pereira2, Denise M G Freire3.
Abstract
class="Chemical">Rhamnolipids are biosurfactants with potential for diversified industrial and envEntities:
Keywords: Biosurfactant; Homoserine lactones; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Rhamnolipid
Year: 2016 PMID: 27257553 PMCID: PMC4888285 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Densitometry of the thin layer chromatographs of rhamnolipids synthesized in culture medium at different pH values.
Relative percentages of the rhamnolipid types synthesized as a function of the pH of the culture medium.
| pH | Dirhamnolipids (%) | Monorhamnolipids (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 6.26 | 74.35 | 25.65 |
| 6.66 | 75.35 | 24.65 |
| 7.00 | 76.41 | 23.59 |
| 7.30 | 55.25 | 44.75 |
| 7.70 | 51.66 | 48.34 |
| 7.83 | 52.75 | 47.25 |
Figure 2Variation of rhamnolipid synthesis as a function of the pH of the culture medium. The triangles and circles correspond to independent experiments.
Figure 3Progress curves of yield coefficient Y in culture medium with different supplemental proportions of 120 h-old P. aeruginosa spent culture medium.
Process parameters of rhamnolipid production by P. aeruginosa PA1 in culture medium supplemented with different percentages of spent medium containing endogenous autoinducers.
| Parameters | 0% | 1% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔRhamnolipids (g L−1) | 4.79 | 4.50 | 7.85 | 8.09 | 8.83 | 9.39 |
| ΔBiomass (g L−1) | 4.98 | 5.31 | 5.96 | 5.53 | 5.40 | 5.68 |
| 0.96 | 0.85 | 1.32 | 1.46 | 1.63 | 1.65 | |
| 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.38 | |
| 0.027 | 0.026 | 0.044 | 0.047 | 0.051 | 0.054 | |
| 0.014 | 0.012 | 0.021 | 0.028 | 0.029 | 0.031 | |
Notes.
Difference between final and initial rhamnolipid concentration
Difference between final and initial cellular concentration
Yield of product synthesized per unit of cell mass produced
Yield of product synthesized per unit of substrate consumed
Volumetric rhamnolipids production rate
Volumetric glycerol consumption rate
Figure 4Relation between the specific rate of rhamnolipid synthesis and the addition of different proportions of 120 h-old P. aeruginosa spent culture medium.
Figure 5Progress curve of glycerol (A) and nitrate (B) consumption during the fed-batch process using different feeding strategies.
C and N, fed with carbon and nitrogen sources together. C, fed only with the carbon source. H2O, fed with water instead of nutrients.
Process parameters observed in fed batch processes under different feeding conditions.
| Parameters | C + N | C | H2O |
|---|---|---|---|
| ΔRhamnolipids (g L−1) | 10.93 | 7.76 | 2.88 |
| ΔBiomass (g L−1) | 4.78 | 3.34 | 2.41 |
| 2.29 | 2.32 | 1.19 | |
| 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.21 | |
| 0.047 | 0.033 | 0.027 | |
| 0.168 | 0.073 | 0.197 | |
| 0.027 | 0.027 | 0.027 |
Notes.
Difference between final and initial rhamnolipid concentration
Difference between final and initial cellular concentration
Yield of product synthesized per unit of cell mass produced
Yield of product synthesized per unit of substrate consumed
Volumetric rhamnolipids production rate
Volumetric glycerol consumption rate
Volumetric nitrate consumption rate. The parameters for the condition “H2O” were calculated at 100 h of culture
Figure 6P. aeruginosa growth curves (A) and time course of rhamnolipid production (B) in the fed-batch process using different feeding strategies.
C and N, fed with carbon and nitrogen sources together. C, fed only with the carbon source. H2O, fed with water instead of nutrients.