| Literature DB >> 27257346 |
Ye Lu1, Rui Yang1, Xin Jiang1, Yajuan Yang2, Fei Peng2, Hongbin Yuan1.
Abstract
Postoperative fatigue syndrome is a general complication after surgery. However, there is no ''gold standard'' for fatigue assessment due to the lack of objective biomarkers. In this study, a rodent model of postoperative fatigue syndrome based on partial hepatectomy was firstly established and serum metabonomic method based on ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with Q-TOF mass spectrometry was applied. Partial least-squares discriminant analysis was used to identify the differential metabolites in 70% partial hepatectomy rats relative to sham rats and 30% partial hepatectomy rats, which showed 70% partial hepatectomy group was significantly distinguishable from 30% partial hepatectomy group and sham group. Eighteen serum metabolites responsible for the discrimination were identified. The levels of hypoxanthine, kynurenine, tryptophan, uric acid, phenylalanine, palmitic acid, arachidonic acid and oleic acid showed progressive elevation from sham group to 30% partial hepatectomy group to 70% partial hepatectomy group, and levels of valine, tyrosine, isoleucine, linoleyl carnitine, palmitoylcarnitine, lysophosphatidylcholine (16:0), lysophosphatidylcholine (20:3), citric acid, succinic acid and hippuric acid showed progressive declining trend from sham group to 30% partial hepatectomy group to 70% partial hepatectomy group. These potential biomarkers help to understand of etiology, pathophysiology and treatment of postoperative fatigue syndrome.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; metabonomics; partial hepatectomy; postoperative fatigue syndrome; ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry
Year: 2016 PMID: 27257346 PMCID: PMC4865597 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.15-72
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Fig. 1Representative UHPLC-Q-TOFMS total ion current (TIC) chromatograms of 70% PHx rat serum, scores plots and permutation test from PLS-DA. (A) positive ion mode TIC, (B) negative ion mode TIC, (C) and (D) PLS-DA scores plot derived from UHPLC-(+)ESI-QTOFMS and UHPLC-(–)ESI-Q-TOFMS datasets derived from concerning sham rats (■), 30% PHx rats (▲) and 70% PHx rats (◆), respectively. (F) and (E) Plot of the permutation test of PLS-DA on sham rats (■), 30% PHx rats (▲) and 70% PHx rats (◆) from UHPLC-(+)ESI-QTOFMS and UHPLC-(–)ESI-Q-TOFMS datasets, respectively.
Identification results of candidate biomarkers in serum for discriminating sham, 30% PHx and 70% PHx rats
| No. | RT (min)a | m/z | Formula | Metabolite | VIPd | Trende | Ratiof | Sham group & 70% PHx group | Cijh | Related pathway | %RSDi | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30% PHx | 70% PHx | AUCg | Sensitivity | Specificity | ||||||||||
| 1 | 0.69 | 118.0869 | C5H11NO2 | Valineb | 2.7 | ↓ | 0.82 | 0.64 | 0.87 (0.72–0.98) | 0.75 | 0.87 | –0.62 | BCAA metabolism | 9.6 |
| 2 | 0.72 | 137.0451 | C5H4N4O | Hypoxanthineb | 1.3 | ↑ | 1.21 | 1.66 | 0.85 (0.59–0.97) | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.53 | Purine metabolism | 13.6 |
| 3 | 1.65 | 182.0808 | C9H11NO3 | Tyrosineb | 1.6 | ↓ | 0.79 | 0.53 | 0.83 (0.56–0.96) | 0.87 | 0.87 | –0.81 | Phenylalanine metabolism | 9.5 |
| 4 | 1.79 | 132.1019 | C6H13NO2 | Isoleucineb | 2.6 | ↓ | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.80 (0.54–0.95) | 0.75 | 0.75 | –0.56 | BCAA metabolism | 8.2 |
| 5 | 3.32 | 209.0926 | C10H12N2O3 | Kynurenineb | 1.2 | ↑ | 1.33 | 1.66 | 0.97 (0.74–0.99) | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.73 | Tryptophan metabolism | 12.3 |
| 6 | 4.67 | 205.0973 | C11H12N2O2 | Tryptophanb | 3.1 | ↑ | 1.13 | 1.44 | 0.83 (0.56–0.96) | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.65 | Tryptophan metabolism | 5.1 |
| 7 | 12.45 | 424.3435 | C25H45NO4 | Linoleyl carnitinec | 3.2 | ↓ | 0.88 | 0.74 | 0.73 (0.51–0.92) | 0.75 | 0.62 | –0.53 | Fatty acid transportion | 7.8 |
| 8 | 12.79 | 400.3423 | C23H45NO4 | Palmitoylcarnitinec | 1.6 | ↓ | 0.84 | 0.68 | 0.90 (0.67–0.99) | 0.75 | 0.87 | –0.57 | Fatty acid transportion | 8.5 |
| 9 | 13.4 | 496.3423 | C24H50NO7P | LysoPC(16:0)b | 5.4 | ↓ | 0.89 | 0.78 | 0.79 (0.53–0.95) | 0.63 | 0.63 | –0.42 | Phospholipid metabolism | 5.6 |
| 10 | 13.47 | 546.3565 | C28H52NO7P | LysoPC(20:3)c | 1.4 | ↓ | 0.93 | 0.63 | 0.81 (0.54–0.96) | 0.63 | 0.75 | –0.45 | Phospholipid metabolism | 6.2 |
| 11 | 1.16 | 167.0215 | C5H4N4O3 | Uric acidb | 3.5 | ↑ | 1.15 | 1.49 | 0.84 (0.57–0.97) | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.58 | Purine metabolism | 9.7 |
| 12 | 1.23 | 191.0207 | C6H8O7 | Citric acidb | 1.3 | ↓ | 0.8 | 0.64 | 0.79 (0.53–0.95) | 0.75 | 0.63 | –0.51 | Citrate cycle | 10.5 |
| 13 | 1.57 | 117.0196 | C4H6O4 | Succinic acidc | 1.3 | ↓ | 0.78 | 0.62 | 0.87 (0.62–0.98) | 0.75 | 0.75 | –0.54 | Citrate cycle | 10.7 |
| 14 | 3.55 | 164.0716 | C9H11NO2 | Phenylalanineb | 1.4 | ↑ | 1.16 | 1.48 | 0.94 (0.70–0.99) | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.73 | Phenylalanine metabolism | 4.8 |
| 15 | 5.49 | 178.0516 | C9H9NO3 | Hippuric acidc | 1.6 | ↓ | 0.9 | 0.78 | 0.79 (0.52–0.95) | 0.75 | 0.63 | –0.57 | Phenylalanine metabolism | 7.6 |
| 16 | 14.46 | 255.2343 | C16H32O2 | Palmitic acidb | 1.3 | ↑ | 1.4 | 1.81 | 0.94 (0.71–0.99) | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.52 | Fatty acid metabolism | 9.2 |
| 17 | 16.67 | 303.2346 | C20H32O2 | Arachidonic acidc | 1.4 | ↑ | 1.41 | 1.93 | 0.96 (0.73–0.99) | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.61 | Fatty acid metabolism | 10.3 |
| 18 | 17.67 | 281.2499 | C18H34O2 | Oleic acidc | 1.1 | ↑ | 1.26 | 1.76 | 0.87 (0.72–0.98) | 0.87 | 0.63 | 0.55 | Fatty acid metabolism | 8.2 |
aRT values in italics are potential biomarkers detected in negative ESI mode and those in non-italics detected in positive ESI mode. bMetabolites validated with standard sample.cMetabolites putatively annotated. dVariable importance in the projection (VIP) was obtained from the PLS-DA model. eMetabolites showed progressive elevation (↑) or a declining (↓) trend from sham group to 30% PHx group to 70% PHx. fThe ratio of relative amounts of 30% PHx group or 70% PHx group to control group. gArea under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, with the 95% confidence interval (CI) range in parentheses. hThe correlation between the identified biomarkers with the fatigue traditional marker data (accumulated immobile time) was performed based on the pearson correlation coefficient (Cij) at the significance level of p<0.05. iVariation of the biomarker concentrations in QC samples expressed as relative standard deviation (%RSD).