Meghan J Elliott1,2, Sarah Gil3,4, Brenda R Hemmelgarn3,4,5, Braden J Manns3,4,5, Marcello Tonelli3,4, Min Jun3, Maoliosa Donald3,4. 1. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. 2. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4N1. 4. Interdisciplinary Chronic Disease Collaboration, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4Z6. 5. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects ∼10% of the adult population. The majority of patients with CKD are managed by primary care physicians, and despite the availability of effective treatment options, the use of evidence-based interventions for CKD in this setting remains suboptimal. Clinical pathways have been identified as effective tools to guide primary care physicians in providing evidence-based care. We aimed to describe the availability, characteristics and credibility of clinical pathways for adult CKD using a scoping review methodology. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL and targeted Internet sites from inception to 31 October 2014 to identify studies and resources that identified adult CKD clinical pathways for primary care settings. Study selection and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers. RESULTS: From 487 citations, 41 items were eligible for review: 7 published articles and 34 grey literature resources published between 2001 and 2014. Of the 41 clinical pathways, 32, 24 and 22% were from the UK, USA and Canada, respectively. The majority (66%, n = 31) of clinical pathways were static in nature (did not have an online interactive feature). The majority (76%) of articles/resources reported using one or more clinical practice guidelines as a resource to guide the clinical pathway content. Few articles described a dissemination and evaluation plan for the clinical pathway, but most reported the targeted end-users. CONCLUSIONS: Our scoping review synthesized available literature on CKD clinical pathways in the primary care setting. We found that existing clinical pathways are diverse in their design, content and implementation. These results can be used by researchers developing or testing new or existing clinical pathways and by practitioners and health system stakeholders who aim to implement CKD clinical pathways in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects ∼10% of the adult population. The majority of patients with CKD are managed by primary care physicians, and despite the availability of effective treatment options, the use of evidence-based interventions for CKD in this setting remains suboptimal. Clinical pathways have been identified as effective tools to guide primary care physicians in providing evidence-based care. We aimed to describe the availability, characteristics and credibility of clinical pathways for adult CKD using a scoping review methodology. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL and targeted Internet sites from inception to 31 October 2014 to identify studies and resources that identified adult CKD clinical pathways for primary care settings. Study selection and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers. RESULTS: From 487 citations, 41 items were eligible for review: 7 published articles and 34 grey literature resources published between 2001 and 2014. Of the 41 clinical pathways, 32, 24 and 22% were from the UK, USA and Canada, respectively. The majority (66%, n = 31) of clinical pathways were static in nature (did not have an online interactive feature). The majority (76%) of articles/resources reported using one or more clinical practice guidelines as a resource to guide the clinical pathway content. Few articles described a dissemination and evaluation plan for the clinical pathway, but most reported the targeted end-users. CONCLUSIONS: Our scoping review synthesized available literature on CKD clinical pathways in the primary care setting. We found that existing clinical pathways are diverse in their design, content and implementation. These results can be used by researchers developing or testing new or existing clinical pathways and by practitioners and health system stakeholders who aim to implement CKD clinical pathways in clinical practice.
Authors: Melissa C Brouwers; Michelle E Kho; George P Browman; Jako S Burgers; Francoise Cluzeau; Gene Feder; Béatrice Fervers; Ian D Graham; Jeremy Grimshaw; Steven E Hanna; Peter Littlejohns; Julie Makarski; Louise Zitzelsberger Journal: CMAJ Date: 2010-07-05 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Michael G Shlipak; Linda F Fried; Casey Crump; Anthony J Bleyer; Teri A Manolio; Russell P Tracy; Curt D Furberg; Bruce M Psaty Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Paul Arora; Priya Vasa; Darren Brenner; Karl Iglar; Phil McFarlane; Howard Morrison; Alaa Badawi Journal: CMAJ Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Noel Engels; Gretchen de Graav; Paul van der Nat; Marinus van den Dorpel; Willem Jan Bos; Anne M Stiggelbout Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Celia C Kamath; Claudia C Dobler; Rozalina G McCoy; Michelle A Lampman; Atieh Pajouhi; Patricia J Erwin; John Matulis; Muhamad Elrashidi; Joseph Darcel; Mouaz Alsawas; Zhen Wang; Nilay D Shah; M Hassan Murad; Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 5.128