| Literature DB >> 27257259 |
Laurent A F Frantz1, Victoria E Mullin2, Maud Pionnier-Capitan3, Ophélie Lebrasseur4, Morgane Ollivier5, Angela Perri6, Anna Linderholm7, Valeria Mattiangeli2, Matthew D Teasdale2, Evangelos A Dimopoulos8, Anne Tresset9, Marilyne Duffraisse5, Finbar McCormick10, László Bartosiewicz11, Erika Gál12, Éva A Nyerges12, Mikhail V Sablin13, Stéphanie Bréhard9, Marjan Mashkour9, Adrian Bălăşescu14, Benjamin Gillet5, Sandrine Hughes5, Olivier Chassaing5, Christophe Hitte15, Jean-Denis Vigne9, Keith Dobney16, Catherine Hänni5, Daniel G Bradley17, Greger Larson1.
Abstract
The geographic and temporal origins of dogs remain controversial. We generated genetic sequences from 59 ancient dogs and a complete (28x) genome of a late Neolithic dog (dated to ~4800 calendar years before the present) from Ireland. Our analyses revealed a deep split separating modern East Asian and Western Eurasian dogs. Surprisingly, the date of this divergence (~14,000 to 6400 years ago) occurs commensurate with, or several millennia after, the first appearance of dogs in Europe and East Asia. Additional analyses of ancient and modern mitochondrial DNA revealed a sharp discontinuity in haplotype frequencies in Europe. Combined, these results suggest that dogs may have been domesticated independently in Eastern and Western Eurasia from distinct wolf populations. East Eurasian dogs were then possibly transported to Europe with people, where they partially replaced European Paleolithic dogs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27257259 DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf3161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Science ISSN: 0036-8075 Impact factor: 47.728