Literature DB >> 27257098

Achondroplasia: Really rhizomelic?

Susan Cheng Shelmerdine1, Helen Brittain2, Owen J Arthurs2,3, Alistair D Calder2.   

Abstract

Achondroplasia is the most common form of short limb dwarfism in humans. The shortening of the limb lengths in achondroplasia is widely described as "rhizomelic." While this appearance may be convincing clinically, the description is not necessarily true or helpful radiologically. The aims of this study, were therefore, to determine whether rhizomelic shortening is a true feature of achondroplasia at diagnosis in infancy. Humeral, radial, femoral, and tibial diaphyseal lengths were recorded by two independent observers from 22 skeletal surveys of infants with achondroplasia and compared with 150 normal age-matched control subjects. Upper and lower limb bone length ratios (radial/humeral and tibial/femoral lengths, respectively) in both groups were compared using an unpaired t-test. Mean upper limb length ratios were statistically higher within the achondroplasia group at 0.87 ± 0.04 (n = 22, mean age 70 ± 94 days) compared to normal controls at 0.79 ± 0.02 (n = 150, mean age 113 days ± 88 days; P < 0.0001). Lower limb length ratios were not significantly different between groups (0.84 ± 0.04 vs. 0.83 ± 0.02, P = 0.46). There was good inter-observer agreement of limb length measurements, with an average measurement difference of 0.1 ± 1.4 mm. In conclusion, infants with achondroplasia demonstrate statistically significant rhizomelic shortening within the upper limbs, but not lower limbs at diagnosis, compared to normal controls. The term "rhizomelic shortening" in relation to achondroplasia should be reserved when describing upper limb proportions.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  achondroplasia; limb proportions; limb ratio; rhizomelic; skeletal dysplasia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27257098     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  3 in total

Review 1.  Achondroplasia: a comprehensive clinical review.

Authors:  Richard M Pauli
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 4.123

Review 2.  Current Care and Investigational Therapies in Achondroplasia.

Authors:  Sheila Unger; Luisa Bonafé; Elvire Gouze
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Diagnosis of Achondroplasia at Birth: A Case Report.

Authors:  Suzit Bhusal; Uttara Gautam; Rajan Phuyal; Robin Choudhary; Sunil Raja Manandhar; Aliska Niroula
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 0.406

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.