Literature DB >> 27256964

Optimal electrode design: Straight versus perimodiolar.

P Gibson1, P Boyd2.   

Abstract

The electrode in a cochlear implant (CI) system is a key factor in hearing performance as it is the interface between the device and the auditory pathway of the recipient. The first CI electrodes were straight and thus adopted a lateral wall position. Subsequent innovations include: perimodiolar electrodes designed to lie adjacent to the modiolar wall and thus to provide more spatially-focused stimulation of the spiral ganglion cells; shorter atraumatic straight electrodes for combined electric and acoustic (hybrid) stimulation. This paper explores the relative merits of straight and perimodiolar electrodes in the search for the optimal electrode design with reference to electrodes from Cochlear(®).
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Design; Hybrid stimulation; Perimodiolar electrode

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27256964     DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2016.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis        ISSN: 1879-7296            Impact factor:   2.080


  8 in total

1.  Comparative study of two different perimodiolar and a straight cochlear implant electrode array: surgical and audiological outcomes.

Authors:  Octavio Garaycochea; Raquel Manrique-Huarte; Carlos Lazaro; Alicia Huarte; Carlos Prieto; Marta Alvarez de Linera-Alperi; Manuel Manrique
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Tight modiolar proximity and feasibility of slim modiolar cochlear implant electrode array insertion in diverse etiologies of hearing loss.

Authors:  Yehree Kim; Yoonjoong Kim; Young Seok Kim; Sang-Yeon Lee; Byung Yoon Choi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Stimulating the Cochlear Apex Without Longer Electrodes: Preliminary Results With a New Approach.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Natalia Stupak; Emily R Spitzer; Lavin Entwisle; Laurel Mahoney; Susan B Waltzman; Sean McMenomey; David R Friedmann; Mario A Svirsky; William Shapiro; J Thomas Roland
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.619

4.  The Pull-Back Technique for the 532 Slim Modiolar Electrode.

Authors:  C Riemann; H Sudhoff; I Todt
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events.

Authors:  Paul Van de Heyning; Peter Roland; Luis Lassaletta; Sumit Agrawal; Marcus Atlas; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Kevin Brown; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Dazert; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Rudolf Hagen; Abdulrahman Hagr; Greg Eigner Jablonski; Mohan Kameswaran; Vladislav Kuzovkov; Martin Leinung; Yongxin Li; Andreas Loth; Astrid Magele; Robert Mlynski; Joachim Mueller; Lorne Parnes; Andreas Radeloff; Chris Raine; Gunesh Rajan; Joachim Schmutzhard; Henryk Skarzynski; Piotr H Skarzynski; Georg Sprinzl; Hinrich Staecker; Timo Stöver; Dayse Tavora-Viera; Vedat Topsakal; Shin-Ichi Usami; Vincent Van Rompaey; Nora M Weiss; Wilhelm Wimmer; Mario Zernotti; Javier Gavilan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-24

6.  Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life after Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Long-Term Deafness.

Authors:  Attila Ovari; Lisa Hühnlein; David Nguyen-Dalinger; Daniel Fabian Strüder; Christoph Külkens; Oliver Niclaus; Jens Eduard Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Electrode Afterload: A Valuable Technique in a Case of Short Electrode Insertion.

Authors:  C Riemann; S Scholz; H Sudhoff; I Todt
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-13

8.  Variation of the cochlear anatomy and cochlea duct length: analysis with a new tablet-based software.

Authors:  Judith E Spiro; Joachim Müller; Jennifer L Spiegel; Daniel Polterauer; John-Martin Hempel; Martin Canis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.503

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.