Elke Hausner1, Charlotte Guddat2, Tatjana Hermanns3, Ulrike Lampert3, Siw Waffenschmidt3. 1. Information Management Unit, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Im Mediapark 8, 50670 Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: elke.hausner@iqwig.de. 2. Department of Medical Biometry (IQWiG), Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Im Mediapark 8, 50670 Cologne, Germany. 3. Information Management Unit, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Im Mediapark 8, 50670 Cologne, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the development of search strategies for systematic reviews, "conceptual approaches" are generally recommended to identify appropriate search terms for those parts of the strategies for which no validated search filters exist. However, "objective approaches" based on search terms identified by text analysis are increasingly being applied. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively compare an objective with a conceptual approach for the development of search strategies. METHODS: Two different MEDLINE search strategies were developed in parallel for five systematic reviews covering a range of topics and study designs. The Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) applied an objective approach, and external experts applied a conceptual approach for the same research questions. For each systematic review, the citations retrieved were combined and the overall pool of citations screened to determine sensitivity and precision. RESULTS: The objective approach yielded a weighted mean sensitivity and precision of 97% and 5%. The corresponding values for the conceptual approach were 75% and 4%. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the objective approach applied by IQWiG for search strategy development yields higher sensitivity than and similar precision to a conceptual approach. The main advantage of the objective approach is that it produces consistent results across searches.
BACKGROUND: In the development of search strategies for systematic reviews, "conceptual approaches" are generally recommended to identify appropriate search terms for those parts of the strategies for which no validated search filters exist. However, "objective approaches" based on search terms identified by text analysis are increasingly being applied. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively compare an objective with a conceptual approach for the development of search strategies. METHODS: Two different MEDLINE search strategies were developed in parallel for five systematic reviews covering a range of topics and study designs. The Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) applied an objective approach, and external experts applied a conceptual approach for the same research questions. For each systematic review, the citations retrieved were combined and the overall pool of citations screened to determine sensitivity and precision. RESULTS: The objective approach yielded a weighted mean sensitivity and precision of 97% and 5%. The corresponding values for the conceptual approach were 75% and 4%. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the objective approach applied by IQWiG for search strategy development yields higher sensitivity than and similar precision to a conceptual approach. The main advantage of the objective approach is that it produces consistent results across searches.
Authors: Jian Li; Frank Pega; Yuka Ujita; Chantal Brisson; Els Clays; Alexis Descatha; Marco M Ferrario; Lode Godderis; Sergio Iavicoli; Paul A Landsbergis; Maria-Inti Metzendorf; Rebecca L Morgan; Daniela V Pachito; Hynek Pikhart; Bernd Richter; Mattia Roncaioli; Reiner Rugulies; Peter L Schnall; Grace Sembajwe; Xavier Trudel; Akizumi Tsutsumi; Tracey J Woodruff; Johannes Siegrist Journal: Environ Int Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Joao P De Aquino; Suprit Parida; Victor J Avila-Quintero; Jose Flores; Peggy Compton; Thomas Hickey; Oscar Gómez; Mehmet Sofuoglu Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Melissa L Rethlefsen; Shona Kirtley; Siw Waffenschmidt; Ana Patricia Ayala; David Moher; Matthew J Page; Jonathan B Koffel Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2021-01-26
Authors: Melissa L Rethlefsen; Shona Kirtley; Siw Waffenschmidt; Ana Patricia Ayala; David Moher; Matthew J Page; Jonathan B Koffel Journal: J Med Libr Assoc Date: 2021-04-01
Authors: Chris Cooper; Andrew Booth; Jo Varley-Campbell; Nicky Britten; Ruth Garside Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 4.615