BACKGROUND: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the most widely used tumor markers, and its level is increased in 30-60% of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). However, little is known about the implications of CEA as a prognostic marker in metastatic PC. The purpose of this study was to examine the usefulness of CEA levels as a prognostic marker in patients with metastatic PC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from a computerized database. A total of 433 patients with metastatic disease were analyzed. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter for patients with high CEA (>5 ng/ml) than with normal CEA (≤5 ng/ml) (6.8 vs. 10.3 months, respectively; p < 0.001). After adjustment, CEA level was an independent predictive factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-2.26). In the high CEA group, OS in patients treated with combination chemotherapy was similar to that with single-agent chemotherapy (median, 7.1 vs. 6.8 months; HR for OS, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.71-1.40). CONCLUSIONS: The present results show that CEA level is an independent prognostic factor in patients with metastatic PC. A combination chemotherapy regimen may offer modest survival benefit in patients with high CEA.
BACKGROUND:Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the most widely used tumor markers, and its level is increased in 30-60% of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). However, little is known about the implications of CEA as a prognostic marker in metastatic PC. The purpose of this study was to examine the usefulness of CEA levels as a prognostic marker in patients with metastatic PC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from a computerized database. A total of 433 patients with metastatic disease were analyzed. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter for patients with high CEA (>5 ng/ml) than with normal CEA (≤5 ng/ml) (6.8 vs. 10.3 months, respectively; p < 0.001). After adjustment, CEA level was an independent predictive factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-2.26). In the high CEA group, OS in patients treated with combination chemotherapy was similar to that with single-agent chemotherapy (median, 7.1 vs. 6.8 months; HR for OS, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.71-1.40). CONCLUSIONS: The present results show that CEA level is an independent prognostic factor in patients with metastatic PC. A combination chemotherapy regimen may offer modest survival benefit in patients with high CEA.
Authors: Leonel Pekarek; Oscar Fraile-Martinez; Cielo Garcia-Montero; Miguel A Saez; Ines Barquero-Pozanco; Laura Del Hierro-Marlasca; Patricia de Castro Martinez; Adoración Romero-Bazán; Miguel A Alvarez-Mon; Jorge Monserrat; Natalio García-Honduvilla; Julia Buján; Melchor Alvarez-Mon; Luis G Guijarro; Miguel A Ortega Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 6.575